Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-23 Thread Florian Weimer
* Patrik Olsson:

 You can turn off the netscreen flow style of forwarding and fall back
 to packet based forwarding in J series and SRX for that matter. But
 still, the perfomance number stays the same even if you keep the flow
 based forwarding instead och packet based.

It seems that this is (a) un(der)documented and (b) results in strange
stability issues.  The box turns unresponsive during commits and
eventually hangs (with just one BGP feed and 1 GB RAM).

-- 
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH   http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100  tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-23 Thread Joe Goldberg
I saw the same thing in my testing.  It's a memory issue.  I upgraded to a 
fully loaded J4350 and everything is running great.

Thanks,
Joe


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Florian Weimer
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:31 AM
To: Patrik Olsson
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

* Patrik Olsson:

 You can turn off the netscreen flow style of forwarding and fall back
 to packet based forwarding in J series and SRX for that matter. But
 still, the perfomance number stays the same even if you keep the flow
 based forwarding instead och packet based.

It seems that this is (a) un(der)documented and (b) results in strange
stability issues.  The box turns unresponsive during commits and
eventually hangs (with just one BGP feed and 1 GB RAM).

-- 
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH   http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100  tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Morten Isaksen
Hi!

I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
packets.

I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.

I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.

Can the J2320 handle this?

-- 
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Paul Stewart
No... I looked at the same thing.  Going by the specs (unless I'm
misunderstanding) with 1 Gig RAM it's limited to 400k BGP routes... 

I really hope someone could prove me wrong ;)  The 6350 handles 1000k BGP
routes with 2 Gig RAM just getting ready to order one of them for the
same purpose and traffic levels you have in mind (for a customer site)

Paul


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
Sent: February-18-10 4:37 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

Hi!

I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
packets.

I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.

I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.

Can the J2320 handle this?

-- 
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Morten Isaksen
As far as I am told it is 2 Gig now. Juniper has just not updated the
spec on the web.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote:
 BTW - the max memory in a J2320 is 1 Gig..;)

 -Original Message-
 From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
 [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
 Sent: February-18-10 4:37 AM
 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

 Hi!

 I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
 and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
 packets.

 I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.

 I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.

 Can the J2320 handle this?

 --
 Morten Isaksen
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp






-- 
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Patrik Olsson
Hi!

I'd say the 200 Mbps wont work... J2320 is 100 Mbps around... and I
think that is iMix, not small packets. I think you need a J4350.

I run a J2320 myself as an BGP Internet router for a webhotel. I can
handle upto 100 Mbps traffic with no problem. I also potentially have
room for another full feed in the RAM.

Patrik


Morten Isaksen wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
 and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
 packets.
 
 I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.
 
 I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.
 
 Can the J2320 handle this?
 


-- 

//Patrik

Webkom
http://www.webkom.se

+46 (0)709 35 22 99
+46 (0)8 559 26 488


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Patrik Olsson:

 I'd say the 200 Mbps wont work... J2320 is 100 Mbps around... and I
 think that is iMix, not small packets. I think you need a J4350.

It seems J-series has been repositioned as a NetScreen-like security
appliance (which is also reflected in configuration defaults).  Does
it still make sense to use them for new deployments as ordinary
routers?

-- 
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH   http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100  tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Dan Farrell
If you didn't need full routes you could go with the EX series for pretty cheap.

Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:37 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

Hi!

I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
packets.

I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.

I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.

Can the J2320 handle this?

--
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4876 (20100218) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4876 (20100218) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Paul Stewart
Yes, but he's stated two transits so presumed that meant full tables X 2
..

We're ordering a J6350 for this purpose to be safe... we were told that we
had to go J6350 to hold two full tables...

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Farrell
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:30 AM
To: Morten Isaksen; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

If you didn't need full routes you could go with the EX series for pretty
cheap.

Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:37 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

Hi!

I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
packets.

I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.

I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.

Can the J2320 handle this?

--
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4876 (20100218) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4876 (20100218) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Patrik Olsson
Yes, if you only are announced a default route via BGP from two peers
and use local preference to choose which one to use... you get away with
a lot of ports in line rate capacity with an EX3200 at low price!

But then,if you only need 200 Mbps, you could go for SRX210 or SRX240
w/advanced license for BGP. Cheaper than J series!

Patrik

Dan Farrell wrote:
 If you didn't need full routes you could go with the EX series for pretty 
 cheap.
 
 Dan Farrell
 Applied Innovations Corp.
 da...@appliedi.net
 
 -Original Message-
 From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
 [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
 Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:37 AM
 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router
 
 Hi!
 
 I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
 and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
 packets.
 
 I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.
 
 I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few access-lists.
 
 Can the J2320 handle this?
 
 --
 Morten Isaksen
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 
 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
 database 4876 (20100218) __
 
 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 
 
 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
 database 4876 (20100218) __
 
 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


-- 

//Patrik

Webkom
http://www.webkom.se

+46 (0)709 35 22 99
+46 (0)8 559 26 488


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Joe Goldberg
I am in the middle of pilot with this very configuration, J2320 with 2
transits with full routes.  The box with 1GB of RAM was not able to
handle it.  We started to get weird performance issues and some random
crashing and hanging due to the lack of memory.  We are now evaluating a
J4350 and it seems to be working very well.  I would be very interested
though if the J2320 can take more than 1GB of RAM  now.  That would be
news to me.

Thanks,
Joe


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Farrell
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:30 AM
To: Morten Isaksen; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

If you didn't need full routes you could go with the EX series for
pretty cheap.

Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:37 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

Hi!

I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable
and 100-200 Mbit throughput - most of it is VOIP traffic so small
packets.

I am planning to buy a J2320 with 2 GB RAM.

I am not planing to use any other features as BGP and a few
access-lists.

Can the J2320 handle this?

--
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4876 (20100218) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4876 (20100218) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Tore Anderson
* TCIS List Acct

 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..

There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, «Advanced BGP License for J-Series», which
almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
though.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Tore Anderson
* Niels Raijer

 Correct, a J2320 can have 2 GB of RAM:

Did you upgrade it to 2 GB yourself?  If so, it would be great if you
could share which RAM manufacturer and part number you used.

The February price list says (like the web site) that the J2320-JH model
ships with 1 GB of RAM.  I can't see any 2 GB alternative either.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Paul Stewart
So then comes the question of support - will Juniper support you if it's
non-standard? ;)  I don't know ... just curious...

Paul


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tore Anderson
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:41 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Niels Raijer
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

* Niels Raijer

 Correct, a J2320 can have 2 GB of RAM:

Did you upgrade it to 2 GB yourself?  If so, it would be great if you
could share which RAM manufacturer and part number you used.

The February price list says (like the web site) that the J2320-JH model
ships with 1 GB of RAM.  I can't see any 2 GB alternative either.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Morten Isaksen
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Tore Anderson
tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com wrote:
 * TCIS List Acct

 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..

 There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, «Advanced BGP License for J-Series», which
 almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
 exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
 though.

Route reflector support.

-- 
Morten Isaksen
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Niels Raijer
Op 18 feb 2010, om 16:40 heeft Tore Anderson het volgende geschreven:

 Correct, a J2320 can have 2 GB of RAM:
 
 Did you upgrade it to 2 GB yourself?  If so, it would be great if you
 could share which RAM manufacturer and part number you used.


Yes, we upgraded the RAM ourselves, for obvious reasons ;-)

The web shop we ordered it from (a generic PC parts web shop) had the following 
description on the order:

Product : Corsair Value Select - Memory - 512 MB - DIMM 184-pins -
DDR - 400 MHz / PC3200 - CL2.5 - non-buffered - non-ECC

Note that our network, although we have our own AS, we are a RIPE NCC member 
etc., is that of a hobby club -- we do not have an SLA to offer to our members. 
We have excellent experience with the J2320 used as full BGP routers with 
multiple transits but if you interpret any of my words as advice, please be 
sure to take into account that we do not run a commercial network on them. 

-- 
Niels Raijer
ni...@fusix.nl
http://fusix.nl




___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Shane Short
I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..

I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series routers and 
simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the license is almost as 
much as the unit itself. what gives?

-Shane

On 18/02/2010, at 11:28 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:

 * TCIS List Acct
 
 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..
 
 There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, «Advanced BGP License for J-Series», which
 almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
 exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
 though.
 
 Best regards,
 -- 
 Tore Anderson
 Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
 Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Shane Short:

 I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..

 I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series
 routers and simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the
 license is almost as much as the unit itself. what gives?

As far as I can tell, everything you need to run a regular BGP router
is there, even without the advanced BGP license.  It's likely that you
don't have to pay the additional licensing fee.

-- 
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH   http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100  tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:41:33 pm Shane Short wrote:

 I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..
 
 I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some
  J series routers and simply haven't, because as you
  said-- the price of the license is almost as much as the
  unit itself. what gives?

This is one of the reasons it's been easier to choose 
Cisco's 7201 for route reflector purposes. This feature 
comes stock in IOS, and we don't need to pay extra for it. 
Besides, IOS, in its madness, occupies a much smaller memory 
footprint on this 2GB DRAM unit.

Having said that, due to the way Juniper implement EoMPLS 
l2vpn's (with a BGP control plane), having a J6350 is handy 
in a largely-Juniper network.

Cheers,

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Stacy W. Smith
On Feb 18, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:

 * Shane Short:
 
 I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..
 
 I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series
 routers and simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the
 license is almost as much as the unit itself. what gives?
 
 As far as I can tell, everything you need to run a regular BGP router
 is there, even without the advanced BGP license.  It's likely that you
 don't have to pay the additional licensing fee.

I think you are correct. I believe the advanced BGP license is only needed if 
the router will be configured as a route reflector.

--Stacy

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Chris Kawchuk
As stated before, The Advanced BGP Licence is for Route-Reflector capability.

The system does full i/eBGP out-of-the-box (normal JunOS).

Also look at the SRX series - which are basically pumped up J's running the 
virtually same code. (and yes, you can kick an SRX into packet mode)

- Chris.



On 2010-02-18, at 8:41 AM, Shane Short wrote:

 I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..
 
 I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series routers and 
 simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the license is almost as 
 much as the unit itself. what gives?
 
 -Shane
 
 On 18/02/2010, at 11:28 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
 
 * TCIS List Acct
 
 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..
 
 There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, «Advanced BGP License for J-Series», which
 almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
 exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
 though.
 
 Best regards,
 -- 
 Tore Anderson
 Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
 Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Jensen Tyler
The BGP License is for Route reflectors only. All other BGP functions work. I 
have 17 or so J2350's running BGP with no extra licensing. They are only peered 
with Internet2 (26,000 in RIB), so I can't comment on usability for multiple 
Internet peers.

Jensen Tyler
Network Engineer
Fiberutilities Group, LLC


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Short
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:42 AM
To: Tore Anderson
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..

I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series routers and 
simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the license is almost as 
much as the unit itself. what gives?

-Shane

On 18/02/2010, at 11:28 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:

 * TCIS List Acct

 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..

 There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, Advanced BGP License for J-Series, which
 almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
 exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
 though.

 Best regards,
 --
 Tore Anderson
 Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
 Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Patrik Olsson
No BGP license of J series right? Only on EX?
I think route reflector demands license on Jseries!

Patrik

Shane Short wrote:
 I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..
 
 I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series routers and 
 simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the license is almost as 
 much as the unit itself. what gives?
 
 -Shane
 
 On 18/02/2010, at 11:28 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
 
 * TCIS List Acct

 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..
 There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, «Advanced BGP License for J-Series», which
 almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
 exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
 though.

 Best regards,
 -- 
 Tore Anderson
 Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
 Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


-- 

//Patrik

Webkom
http://www.webkom.se

+46 (0)709 35 22 99
+46 (0)8 559 26 488


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Shane Short
That would explain it-- my very shallow depth of Juniper knowledge started on 
the EX series :)

-Shane


On 19/02/2010, at 2:54 AM, Patrik Olsson wrote:

 No BGP license of J series right? Only on EX?
 I think route reflector demands license on Jseries!
 
 Patrik
 
 Shane Short wrote:
 I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..
 
 I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series routers 
 and simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the license is almost 
 as much as the unit itself. what gives?
 
 -Shane
 
 On 18/02/2010, at 11:28 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
 
 * TCIS List Acct
 
 But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the
 EX3200 series?  That license adds thousands to the cost..
 There's also JX-BGP-ADV-LTU, «Advanced BGP License for J-Series», which
 almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what
 exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license,
 though.
 
 Best regards,
 -- 
 Tore Anderson
 Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
 Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 
 -- 
 
 //Patrik
 
 Webkom
 http://www.webkom.se
 
 +46 (0)709 35 22 99
 +46 (0)8 559 26 488
 
 

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Niels Raijer
Op 18 feb 2010, om 17:13 heeft Morten Isaksen het volgende geschreven:

 This looks a lot like the setup I am builing. I think you convinced me
 to go with the J2320.
 
 What version of the OS are you running?

9.3R4.4. To paraphrase a regular here: the last real JUNOS for J-series, before 
the flow-based ones. Newer versions will run too (I've installed 10.something 
to see if it worked at all) but flow-based stuff gives me the creeps for this 
purpose.

 Any problems with ipv6 on the router?

None whatsoever. Runs absolutely fine with multiple full IPv6 tables. There may 
still be an IPv6 license for sale, but it is not needed to run IPv6 on the 
router (it is probably needed to get *supported* IPv6 to run on the router 
though). We use IS-IS as the IPv6 IGP which works fine too.

The only thing that doesn't work, as has been reported here a few times by now, 
is route reflector capability. We tried it once, but it just doesn't work 
without the license. So we use OpenBGPD for that now :-)

-- 
Niels Raijer
ni...@fusix.nl
http://fusix.nl




___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Evan Williams

seems that what was once a useful source, the well has run dry.

BGP need licencing!!!

licencing and proprietry is Blue Box.

I say get a grip  goodbye. Populate someone else's mailbox with ridiculous 
questions. I despair.


unsubscribe me now.

what gets to me is that these people get work

so long and thanks for all the fish


and you won't hear me singing out these songs when I'm gone. so I guess 
I'll have to do it while I'm here

when I'm gone  - phil ochs

John Train

- Original Message - 
From: Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de

To: Shane Short sh...@short.id.au
Cc: juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Tore Anderson 
tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router


* Shane Short:


I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..

I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series
routers and simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the
license is almost as much as the unit itself. what gives?


As far as I can tell, everything you need to run a regular BGP router
is there, even without the advanced BGP license.  It's likely that you
don't have to pay the additional licensing fee.

--
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH   http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100  tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp 


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:48:41AM -0500, Joe Goldberg wrote:
 I would be very interested though if the J2320 can take more than 1GB
 of RAM  now.  That would be news to me.

Routing Engine status:
...
DRAM  3811 MB
Memory utilization  25 percent
...
Model  RE-J2320-2000

Officially supported though are only 2GB nowadays, as far as I'm aware.
So: kids, do try this only at home (just like me). :-) I cannot say
wether this (4x1G) runs stable, but I saw 2G (2x1G) and 2.5G (2x1G + 2x256M)
J2320 running fine for many months with multiple full BGP tables.

It's just product management. Just like the BGP route reflection
dongle key. JNPR knows those boxes are very interesting for small/mid BGP
demand networks as central route reflectors, so they squeeze some more
money out of these deployments. Unfortunately, folks NOT using the
routers in such a setup but occasionally need some route reflection
are... colateral damage. Been there, still suffering from that.

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- d...@ircnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

2010-02-18 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday 19 February 2010 11:06:48 am Daniel Roesen wrote:

 It's just product management. Just like the BGP route
  reflection dongle key. JNPR knows those boxes are very
  interesting for small/mid BGP demand networks as
  central route reflectors, so they squeeze some more
  money out of these deployments. Unfortunately, folks NOT
  using the routers in such a setup but occasionally need
  some route reflection are... colateral damage. Been
  there, still suffering from that.

Legacy JUNOS fans will be happy to have, well, JUNOS, on the 
J-series (and the EX-series) after coming from the M/T-
series platforms.

However, if you don't mind the IOS cruft and are really 
focusing on core features and hardware performance, the 
Cisco 7201 is a decent platform when pitched against the 
J2320, and in some cases, even the J4350. I've been able to 
do some 950Mbps through them @ 90% CPU utilization without 
dropping a packet. You'd miss the JUNOS niceties, but it's a 
capable box worth considering if you find yourself stuck in 
this category.

Cheers,

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp