Re: [j-nsp] MX960 differing RE REVs is this ok

2019-01-23 Thread Wojciech Janiszewski
Hi Aaron,

I'd say it is not relevant for ISSU. Different hw revisions might have
different chips or capacitors here or there , but functionally they should
be the same.

Regards,
Wojciech

śr., 23 sty 2019, 16:55: Aaron Gould  napisał(a):

> Does ISSU require same *Rev* of RE ?
>
>
>
> ...and is there any reason why I would NOT want to run different Rev of RE
> in my MX960 ?
>
>
>
> Is it ok to run different rev of RE ?  I have REV 17 as RE0 and REV 15 as
> RE1.  Is this ok?
>
>
>
> root> show chassis hardware models | grep Routing
>
> Routing Engine 0 REV 17   750-054758   (removed)  RE-S-X6-64G-S
>
> Routing Engine 1 REV 15   750-054758   (removed)  RE-S-X6-64G-S
>
>
>
> -Aaron
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] MX960 differing RE REVs is this ok

2019-01-23 Thread Aaron Gould
Does ISSU require same *Rev* of RE ?

 

...and is there any reason why I would NOT want to run different Rev of RE
in my MX960 ?

 

Is it ok to run different rev of RE ?  I have REV 17 as RE0 and REV 15 as
RE1.  Is this ok?

 

root> show chassis hardware models | grep Routing

Routing Engine 0 REV 17   750-054758   (removed)  RE-S-X6-64G-S

Routing Engine 1 REV 15   750-054758   (removed)  RE-S-X6-64G-S

 

-Aaron

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp