[kwin] [Bug 482142] drag in drop files in Google Chrome renders Chrome unusable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482142 Michal Sylwester changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msylwes...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[plasma-nm] [Bug 350521] [RFE] [OpenVPN] kdeplasma-applets-plasma-nm does not support OTP Tokens for OpenVPN connections
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350521 Michal Sylwester changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED --- Comment #12 from Michal Sylwester --- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 334799] Import button on toolbar not activated after plugging in USB stick/memory card with photos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334799 Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #7 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Works perfect now - thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 334799] Import button on toolbar not activated after plugging in USB stick/memory card with photos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334799 --- Comment #5 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Yes, just tried with current sources. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 361882] New: "Download new" tries to only download selected images
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361882 Bug ID: 361882 Summary: "Download new" tries to only download selected images Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Compiled Sources OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Import Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com Trying to use "Download New" to download new images from SD card makes Digikam try to import selected images instead Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: In both cases ensure there are images marked as not downloaded yet on SD card Scenario A: 1. Unselect all images Scenario B: 1. Select previously downloaded image Common: 2. Select Download New 3. Complete other download steps Actual Results: Scenario A: Nothing happens Scenario B: I get dialog from Digikam telling me that I'm trying to overwrite existing image (one of the selected ones) Expected Results: In both scenarios: selection is ignored, new images are downloaded I believe it worked fine around beta 3 (except for marking the downloaded images, but that was addressed in 359386) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360462] Can't drag image from list to map in Google Maps mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360462 --- Comment #4 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Interesting, I forgot to mention this, but it works fine on 4.14 from Ubuntu. I will try to check whether they patched it somehow... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360462] Can't drag image from list to map in Google Maps mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360462 --- Comment #2 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 97862 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97862=edit Screenshot of the geolocation editor with action marked Red arrow indicates drag start end drop points. After drop nothing happens. Unfortunately I didn't manage to include the mouse pointer... Note Google Maps in map area. With OpenStreetMap the action is successful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360462] New: Can't drag image from list to map in Google Maps mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360462 Bug ID: 360462 Summary: Can't drag image from list to map in Google Maps mode Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Compiled Sources OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: Geolocation-Editor Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com When trying to drag an image from list to the map while in Google Maps mode the mouse cursor indicates it is not possible (and it actually isn't). In OpenStreetMap mode it works as expected. Also (I can open a separate wishlist/bug items for these, just le me know): - would be nice to be able to drag images directly on the map (I thought it used to be possible?) - add a minimum height to the images list (somehow I managed to open the window with the list invisible, took me a while to find it) - geolocation editor does not remember it's size for me (related to 357738?) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open geolocation editor 2. Ensure google maps mode is being used 3. Try to drag image from the list to the map Actual Results: "Can't do this" mouse cursor, when mouse button is released nothing happens Expected Results: Image is geotagged at the "drop" coordinates Workaround: Use OpenStreetMap map instead -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360434] Geolocation Editor messed up size and contents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360434 --- Comment #8 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Took me longer to compile it than it took you to fix it! Looks like everything I mentioned is fine now, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kde] [Bug 360436] New: Crash after running gps correlation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360436 Bug ID: 360436 Summary: Crash after running gps correlation Product: kde Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: drkonqi Severity: crash Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: unassigned-b...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com Application: digikam5 (5.0.0-beta3) Qt Version: 5.4.2 Operating System: Linux 4.2.0-29-generic x86_64 Distribution: Ubuntu 15.10 -- Information about the crash: - What I was doing when the application crashed: In the Geolocation Editor run the correlation with gpx file. Crashed after all images were tagged. Some images were actually groups of 2, in these cases only the first image was tagged. -- Backtrace: Application: digiKam (digikam5), signal: Segmentation fault Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fda5eaf9b80 (LWP 1408))] Thread 20 (Thread 0x7fda5e6f6700 (LWP 1410)): #0 0x7fda8a87f88d in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 #1 0x7fda68ca012c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libusb-1.0.so.0 #2 0x7fda86b8d6aa in start_thread (arg=0x7fda5e6f6700) at pthread_create.c:333 #3 0x7fda8a88ae9d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 19 (Thread 0x7fda5b6ca700 (LWP 1412)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7fda8b18a55b in QWaitCondition::wait(QMutex*, unsigned long) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #2 0x7fda8d771d82 in Digikam::ScanController::run (this=0x7fda8e0354e0 <_ZZN7Digikam12_GLOBAL__N_113Q_QGS_creator13innerFunctionEvE6holder>) at /build/digikam5-YeukDu/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/utils/scancontroller.cpp:696 #3 0x7fda8b1892be in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #4 0x7fda86b8d6aa in start_thread (arg=0x7fda5b6ca700) at pthread_create.c:333 #5 0x7fda8a88ae9d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 18 (Thread 0x7fda5aec9700 (LWP 1415)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7fda4b9564da in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/r600_dri.so #2 0x7fda4b955c17 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/r600_dri.so #3 0x7fda86b8d6aa in start_thread (arg=0x7fda5aec9700) at pthread_create.c:333 #4 0x7fda8a88ae9d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 17 (Thread 0x7fda47e22700 (LWP 1456)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7fda8b18a55b in QWaitCondition::wait(QMutex*, unsigned long) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #2 0x7fda8cc067b3 in Digikam::ParkingThread::run (this=0x1b97e00) at /build/digikam5-YeukDu/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/threads/threadmanager.cpp:115 #3 0x7fda8b1892be in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #4 0x7fda86b8d6aa in start_thread (arg=0x7fda47e22700) at pthread_create.c:333 #5 0x7fda8a88ae9d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 16 (Thread 0x7fda47621700 (LWP 1457)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7fda80b5648b in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5WebKit.so.5 #2 0x7fda80b564c9 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5WebKit.so.5 #3 0x7fda86b8d6aa in start_thread (arg=0x7fda47621700) at pthread_create.c:333 #4 0x7fda8a88ae9d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 15 (Thread 0x7fd9ceffd700 (LWP 1493)): #0 0x7fda82726869 in g_mutex_lock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0x7fda826e1c2c in g_main_context_check () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7fda826e2190 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0x7fda826e22fc in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #4 0x7fda8b3c029b in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #5 0x7fda8b36675a in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #6 0x7fda8b1843d4 in QThread::exec() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #7 0x7fda8b1892be in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #8 0x7fda86b8d6aa in start_thread (arg=0x7fd9ceffd700) at pthread_create.c:333 #9 0x7fda8a88ae9d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 14 (Thread 0x7fd9ce7fc700 (LWP 1494)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7fda808645b4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5WebKit.so.5
[digikam] [Bug 360434] Geolocation Editor messed up size and contents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360434 --- Comment #3 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 97854 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97854=edit Confusing icon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360434] Geolocation Editor messed up size and contents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360434 --- Comment #2 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 97853 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97853=edit Super high progress bar with doubled percentage value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360434] Geolocation Editor messed up size and contents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360434 --- Comment #1 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 97852 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97852=edit Too small initial size -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 360434] New: Geolocation Editor messed up size and contents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360434 Bug ID: 360434 Summary: Geolocation Editor messed up size and contents Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Geolocation-Editor Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com After opening the Geolocation Editor it opens way too small and does not seem to remember it's size (this seems related to 357738). Additionally, the list of images being edited is gone. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Select few images 2. Open Geolocation Editor: - window way too small, no list of images - correlation progress bar at the bottom extra high, percentage doubled - there is a trash icon with a description "Display bookmarked positions on the map." which is confusing... Actual Results: Opens very small, no list of images Expected Results: Reasonable initial size, list of images, progress bar reasonable size See screenshots -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359516] New: Trash not sortable by deletion time
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359516 Bug ID: 359516 Summary: Trash not sortable by deletion time Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: Albums View Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com Items in trash seem to be always sorted by name. Would be nice to have it sortable by date as well. It would be easier to find recently removed items. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to trash, check how images are sorted Actual Results: Sorted always by name Expected Results: Possible to change between sort by name/sort by deletion time It would be nice to have the sorting changeable by clicking the table headers. Also, perhaps it would make sense to disable the View->Sort order while in trash? It does not really work here, and changing order in the real albums while they are not visible may be confusing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359431] When importing images if they are available in pairs with same name/different format consider pairing them as 2 versions of same image
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359431 --- Comment #2 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Nice. I've never used grouping before, I'll see how it works for me. Michal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359431] New: When importing images if they are available in pairs with same name/different format consider pairing them as 2 versions of same image
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359431 Bug ID: 359431 Summary: When importing images if they are available in pairs with same name/different format consider pairing them as 2 versions of same image Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: Versioning Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com Most of the time I'm happy with my camera's JPEGs, however occasionally I like to fall back to RAW for some fine tuning. To facilitate this I tend to shoot photos in camera's RAW + JPEG mode, resulting in 2 files per show. The downside is I have to manually work my way through to duplicates. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set camera to RAW + JPEG mode to record 2 copies of each shot (one in RAW, one in JPEG) 2. Import into Digikam Actual Results: All images are duplicated Expected Results: Best case for me would be to have Digikam show just one image in album, with 2 versions: the RAW image as original one, and the JPEG as current version after camera's processing. This may be very specific to my workflow, I'm not sure how useful it would be for other users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359429] Image history: original image's entry contains markup
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359429 --- Comment #1 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 97227 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97227=edit Screenshot of the relevant part of the sidebar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359429] New: Image history: original image's entry contains markup
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359429 Bug ID: 359429 Summary: Image history: original image's entry contains markup Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: Versioning Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com In image history sidebar the entry for original image contains some markup: is wrapped in ... with an additional in the middle Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open versions sidebar for image with some history Actual Results: Extra markup visible Expected Results: No markup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359087] Preview image scroll position should be smarter when changing between images with different resolutions
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359087 --- Comment #1 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Recalled one more scenario where current implementation is inconvenient. I usually shoot photos in JPEG + RAW mode (so each shot results in 2 files). Beside the nuisance of having each photo fine it works fine, except when the zoom level is changed from 100%. As the RAWs are presented via the embedded JPEG, which has smaller resolution than the full one (in separate file), this also results in the annoying jumping of the zoomed in region. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359386] New: Import from SD forgets downloaded images, but remembers marked as downloaded
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359386 Bug ID: 359386 Summary: Import from SD forgets downloaded images, but remembers marked as downloaded Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Import Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com When importing images from SD card the imported images are marked as downloaded, but after re-inserting same card later they are again marked as new. Interestingly, images marked as downloaded manually are marked so permanently, even after re-inserting the card. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Insert an SD card with new images 2. Open the import tool 3. Download new images - images are marked as downloaded 4. Close and re-open the import tool 5. Images still marked as downloaded - as expected 6. Close the import tool 7. Pull out the SD card 8. Insert the SD card back 9. Open the import tool Actual Results: Up to step 8 everything is as expected. At step 9 the previously downloaded images are marked as new again Expected Results: In step 9 previously downloaded images are marked as downloaded If instead of downloading I just mark the images as downloaded (using Item -> Mark as downloaded) they are marked as downloaded permanently. Just in case this is relevant, my workflow looks right now like this: 1. Open the import dialog 2. Import new images (by manually selecting the really new ones) 3. Mark the images imported during previous import as downloaded (older ones are already marked as downloaded) My non-default import setting: - Date-based sub-albums with custom format - Auto-rotate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359098] New: Edited images are sorted before originals
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359098 Bug ID: 359098 Summary: Edited images are sorted before originals Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: Albums View Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com After editing an image and saving it as new version the new one is sorted before the original. Happens at least when sorted by name or by date. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Select image, let's say "image.jpg" 2. Using editor make same changes 3. Save as new version, file "image_v1.jpg" is created. Actual Results: image_v1.jpg is sorted before image.jpg Expected Results: image_v1.jpg is sorted after image.jpg 4.14 behaves the way I would expect it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kde] [Bug 359097] New: Crash after processing a batch queue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359097 Bug ID: 359097 Summary: Crash after processing a batch queue Product: kde Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: drkonqi Severity: crash Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: unassigned-b...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com Application: digikam5 (5.0.0-beta3) Qt Version: 5.4.2 Operating System: Linux 4.2.0-28-generic x86_64 Distribution: Ubuntu 15.10 -- Information about the crash: Run a batch queue, extracting embedded jpeg images from CR2 files. Images are processed, but then digikam crashes. Happens sometimes - I haven't noticed any specific rule when it happens and when not. Note: I'm using a build that includes workaround for 358913 The crash can be reproduced sometimes. -- Backtrace: Application: digiKam (digikam5), signal: Segmentation fault Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f108909eb80 (LWP 20326))] Thread 18 (Thread 0x7f1088c9b700 (LWP 20327)): #0 0x7f10b4e268dd in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 #1 0x7f109324712c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libusb-1.0.so.0 #2 0x7f10b11346aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f1088c9b700) at pthread_create.c:333 #3 0x7f10b4e31eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 17 (Thread 0x7f1085c6f700 (LWP 20329)): #0 0x7f10b4e2249d in read () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 #1 0x7f10b4da62d0 in _IO_new_file_underflow (fp=0x7f10782b9910) at fileops.c:580 #2 0x7f10b4da5088 in __GI__IO_file_xsgetn (fp=0x7f10782b9910, data=, n=2) at fileops.c:1402 #3 0x7f10b4d9a5f0 in __GI__IO_fread (buf=, size=1, count=2, fp=0x7f10782b9910) at iofread.c:42 #4 0x7f10b065f91c in Exiv2::isJpegType(Exiv2::BasicIo&, bool) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexiv2.so.14 #5 0x7f10b0655239 in Exiv2::ImageFactory::open(std::auto_ptr) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexiv2.so.14 #6 0x7f10b0655489 in Exiv2::ImageFactory::open(std::__cxx11::basic_stringconst&, bool) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexiv2.so.14 #7 0x7f10b70ff53f in Digikam::MetaEngine::load (this=this@entry=0x7f10780d5070, filePath=...) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/dmetadata/metaengine.cpp:281 #8 0x7f10b714c356 in Digikam::DMetadata::load (this=this@entry=0x7f10780d5070, filePath=...) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/dmetadata/dmetadata.cpp:100 #9 0x7f10b67e33a7 in Digikam::ImageScanner::loadFromDisk (this=this@entry=0x7f1085c6e5e0) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/item/imagescanner.cpp:1550 #10 0x7f10b67e3530 in Digikam::ImageScanner::newFile (this=this@entry=0x7f1085c6e5e0, albumId=0) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/item/imagescanner.cpp:289 #11 0x7f10b6725ca4 in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanNewFile (this=this@entry=0x7f1085c6e9f0, info=..., albumId=0) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/collection/collectionscanner.cpp:1252 #12 0x7f10b6727187 in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=this@entry=0x7f1085c6e9f0, location=..., album=...) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/collection/collectionscanner.cpp:1087 #13 0x7f10b6729bc5 in Digikam::CollectionScanner::partialScan (this=this@entry=0x7f1085c6e9f0, albumRoot=..., album=...) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/collection/collectionscanner.cpp:687 #14 0x7f10b6729d0c in Digikam::CollectionScanner::partialScan (this=this@entry=0x7f1085c6e9f0, filePath=...) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/collection/collectionscanner.cpp:613 #15 0x7f10b7d12140 in Digikam::ScanController::run (this=0x7f10b85cd4e0 <_ZZN7Digikam12_GLOBAL__N_113Q_QGS_creator13innerFunctionEvE6holder>) at /home/michal/digikam5-5.0.0~beta3/core/libs/database/utils/scancontroller.cpp:769 #16 0x7f10b57302be in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #17 0x7f10b11346aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f1085c6f700) at pthread_create.c:333 #18 0x7f10b4e31eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 16 (Thread 0x7f108546e700 (LWP 20331)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7f1075f614da in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/r600_dri.so #2 0x7f1075f60c17 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/r600_dri.so #3 0x7f10b11346aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f108546e700) at pthread_create.c:333 #4 0x7f10b4e31eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 15 (Thread 0x7f1072422700 (LWP 20350)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1
[digikam] [Bug 359088] New: With "Show a count of items in Tree Views" Trash always shows count of 0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359088 Bug ID: 359088 Summary: With "Show a count of items in Tree Views" Trash always shows count of 0 Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Albums View Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com With "Show a count of items in Tree Views" Trash shows count of 0 instead of numer of items in trash. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. "Show a count of items in Tree Views" 2. Compare the numer of items shown in tree view with actual trash contents Actual Results: Tree view always shows 0 Expected Results: Numer of items in trash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 359087] New: Preview image scroll position should be smarter when changing between images with different resolutions
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359087 Bug ID: 359087 Summary: Preview image scroll position should be smarter when changing between images with different resolutions Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: Preview Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com When watching images zoomed in it is currently possible to switch to different image and the are shown is preserved (this is convenient as a quick alternative to the light table). The problem occurs when the images have different resolutions. - With a same image in different resolutions different area will be shown - While switching back and forth between images where one is lower resolution the position will be capped to the maximum of the smallest image. Happens when I cropped one image, and accidentally select it while working on another one. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Scenario 1: 1. Make sure there are 2 versions of image, high and low resolution 2. Preview one of them 3. Switch to the other Scenario 2: 1. Make sure one of the images in thummbar has significantly lower resolution 2. Preview high-resolution image (preferabelly in lower right corner) 3. Switch to low-resolution image 4. Switch back to high resolution image Actual Results: Scenario 1: Area further up and left from originally selected is visible Scenario 2: Different area of the image is visible Expected Results: Scenario 1: Same area as originally selected is visible Scenario 2: Same area of both images is visible (here is the additional issue of whether and how zoom should be adjusted) I think this may be a little tricky to make it work the way I would like, especially as it would most likely also require considerations about zoom level - should it change? Most of the time I don't care that much about actual zoom relative to "100%", more to the relative visible area of an image, so it would mean it should also change... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] Using Versionning, after returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated [patch]
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 --- Comment #13 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- I had only time for a quick test so far, but seems to work just as I'd expect it to work. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] Using Versionning, after returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated [patch]
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 --- Comment #12 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Sure, I'll give it a try, but not before weekend. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] After returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 --- Comment #7 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- You're right. After disabling versioning everything works as I would expect it: thumbbar selection does not change, preview is updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] New: After returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 Bug ID: 358913 Summary: After returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org Reporter: msylwes...@gmail.com After editing image, saving it and closing editor... 1. The image shown in the main window is still the one before edits 2. The image selected on the thumbbar is the image following the edited one The thumbnail image is actually correctly updated. I can reproduce it consistently. Additionally, turning the thumbbar off and on removes current selection. This may be related to bug 326796, but my pictures are on NTFS partition. This is on 5.0.0~beta3-wily~ppa1 from philip5's ppa, but I think I've seen it also on 4.x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] After returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 --- Comment #2 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 96976 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96976=edit Bug screencast Note at about 0:10 selection change in thumbbar and image not being updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] After returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 --- Comment #4 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- The preview is one thing. The thumbnail is updated, but the selection moves to the next image. Note at the end I have to click the updated thumbnail to see the updated image. To actually see the following image (the one selected after 0:10) I have to first pick a different picture. It's getting a little wicked, but take a look how the thumbnail selection changes when I clicked save and it should be pretty obvious. BTW: I noticed that sometimes the preview does follows the thumbnail, so I see the correct preview of the next image. It's still the next one, not the edited one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 358913] After returning from edit mode wrong image is selected, image itself is not updated
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358913 --- Comment #5 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 96978 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96978=edit Console output Only part while saving the image, let me know if you need larger context. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 323168] GPG signature validation fails due to KMail modifying headers within received mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323168 --- Comment #13 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Seems to work! When I save the email to file and try to verify it using openssl it validates. I still have some issue with kmail complaining about "Not enough information to check signature validity." but this seems to be unrelated to this particular bug, and possibly an issue with my system. Just in case I'll also attach a newer signed email. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kmail2] [Bug 323168] GPG signature validation fails due to KMail modifying headers within received mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323168 --- Comment #17 from Michal Sylwester <msylwes...@gmail.com> --- Good tip, indeed kmail misses the root cert. I'll try to fix it once I find some more spare time. Anyway, I agree, this is different story, and this bug can be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.