[liquidshell] [Bug 464052] Easier closing of notifications
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464052 --- Comment #2 from Mikko Merikivi --- Hmm, after further thinking, I feel like this could be because I've installed Discord as a Flatpak. It's probably messed up some inter-process communication pipeline or another. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[liquidshell] [Bug 464052] New: Easier closing of notifications
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464052 Bug ID: 464052 Summary: Easier closing of notifications Classification: Miscellaneous Product: liquidshell Version: 1.8.1 Platform: unspecified OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: kol...@aon.at Reporter: mikko...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Discord's notifications at least have that View button, but clicking on it still has the notification pop-up remain on the screen. You'd think that taking actions with the notification's buttons means it's been acknowledged and in many cases those buttons lead to a more elaborate view of the information that is in the pop-up. I suggest making interacting with the notification also close it. Also maybe a setting for the display time of notifications; it seems a tad long for my liking currently. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] Option to disable panel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 Mikko Merikivi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Mikko Merikivi --- I think marking this as resolved is in order (though I'm not sure which of the subcategories is the most fitting). Also I don't think those other things I mentioned in the first post are actual issues, the one in the attachment I'm thinking is an aberration of having two panels open in the same place. And I might have been just stupid in the last paragraph, but I said it was just something potential even then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] Option to disable panel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 --- Comment #4 from Mikko Merikivi --- That seems to be working. Can I put it into config somehow or something so I can just select a Liquidshell session or whatever it was called? I guess I could create some autostart script if there's no built-in option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] Option to disable panel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 --- Comment #2 from Mikko Merikivi --- I'll try explaining again. The default desktop shell, Plasmashell, has memory leaks. Therefore using it is not a favored option. However, going shell-less seems not very great either, since when if I quit Plasmashell with "kquitapp5 plasmashell", then the desktop goes into this kind of mode when a single open window is being dragged: https://i.stack.imgur.com/4RQDU.jpg This sort of scenario can happen when I am using two monitors and there's no current need to be showing any window on the secondary monitor so I drag the last one away from it. So, an alternative shell seems to be what I'd like to find. Liquidshell indeed looks dead simple without the panel, but that's enough to fit my very limited requirements. Just something that shouldn't be causing problems and fixes the glitchy background on an empty screen. I don't know if there's a list of shells to be found; maybe there are yet others indeed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] New: Option to disable panel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 Bug ID: 452286 Summary: Option to disable panel Product: liquidshell Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: kol...@aon.at Reporter: mikko...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 147976 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=147976=edit Desktop showing from between panel and a maximized window I tried switching to Liquidshell when I got frustrated enough with the intractable memory leaks in Plasmashell that only sometimes happen after waking from hibernation. Because I don't know of the clear cause, it seems fruitless to try submitting bug reports when there are already over a dozen unsolved ones about memory consumption. I'm amazed that KDE has alternatives to pretty basic components, and I mostly just needed something to make it so desktops don't become "glitchy" when there's no window open on a screen. I think. Maybe there's more functionality that Plasmashell had whose disappearance would become apparent after a while, but at first glance Liquidshell seemed "good enough". Anyways, a couple of problems that dissuaded me from making the switch are: * I'd like to use Latte Dock instead of the panel provided by Liquidshell, so an option to disable the built-in panel would be nice * See the attachment for a visual glitch I had with the desktop showing between a panel and a maximized window. A real eyesore. I don't know if there was some kind of a conflict because I had Latte also open and that might have messed it up. So testing where the problem is lying might also benefit from being able to disable Liquidshell's own panel. There's potentially some problem with a two monitor setup acting strangely, too, but I'll investigate after Latte doesn't conflict too much with Liquidshell. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[lattedock] [Bug 447882] New: Windows go under an Always Visible panel on dual monitors
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447882 Bug ID: 447882 Summary: Windows go under an Always Visible panel on dual monitors Product: lattedock Version: 0.10.6 Platform: Archlinux Packages OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: application Assignee: mvourla...@gmail.com Reporter: mikko...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- SUMMARY *** Something changed in a problematic way between latte-dock 0.10.4 and 0.10.6. I sometimes use a secondary monitor, and when I do, the panel covers maximized windows on latte-dock 0.10.6. However, this does not happen when using only a single monitor, nor in latte-dock 0.10.4 (I've downgraded to it for now). *** STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Have two monitors on 2. Have Latte Dock in Always Visible mode 3. Open some maximized application OBSERVED RESULT The bottom of the maximized window goes under Latte Dock. EXPECTED RESULT The window will not be covered by the panel. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Linux/KDE Plasma: KDE Plasma Version: Please have a command line command how to get these also listed. KDE Frameworks Version: 5.89.0 Qt Version: 5.15.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[krunner] [Bug 386513] Krunner memory leak
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386513 Mikko Merikivi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikko...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Mikko Merikivi --- There's still some kind of memory leaking in 5.23.2. The memory usage climbed up to gigabytes over time. I haven't been tracking what might cause it; normally it seems to not do it all too much after all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[lattedock] [Bug 445532] [feature] - allow OnDemand panels to reserve space when unhidden
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445532 --- Comment #3 from Mikko Merikivi --- I suppose, since complexity is a consideration that you probably have in mind in your questioning attitude toward the necessity of the suggested feature, why do we even have a separate On Demand Sidebar? Why just not have a dbus toggle that works with any type of dock or panel? I noted that it would work for me to have the dbus toggle available for an Always Visible one, and I imagine some combination of options would be able to replace the current On Demand Sidebar functionality when used with that dbus toggle method (called from a Sidebar Button somewhere). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[lattedock] [Bug 445532] [feature] - allow OnDemand panels to reserve space when unhidden
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445532 --- Comment #2 from Mikko Merikivi --- > 1. What are the benefits compared to the current provided visibility modes? > 3. Why not use an AutoHide panel? I've not seen an option where the panel can get hidden but when visible it resizes overlapping windows. Also with auto-hiding panels there's some amount of annoyance with the panel popping up when the cursor goes on the screen border of the panel's side. This is an option that could be added to AutoHide as well, by the way. My personal use case just is the On Demand Sidebar. > 2. Why not use an AlwaysVisible panel with borderless maximized windows in > combination? The panel takes up space on the screen in this case. Some programs are designed for very specific aspect ratios and/or resolutions, and thus I have to compromise either on using a smaller resolution for the program. I... suppose yet another option is to kill Latte Dock for the time of using a borderless full screen program, and start it back again when quitting. However, I am not always 100% focused on just a windowed full screen application, so I might want to use Latte regardless occasionally. > 5. OnDemand Sidebar are triggering their showing through the Latte Sidebar > Button, are you proposing something different? Not really. It's an option that probably works for some people. For me, I managed to find a command to do it from wherever I think is suitable: qdbus org.kde.lattedock /Latte org.kde.LatteDock.toggleHiddenState "" "" "" "0" > 4. What is the end goal for this? maybe a screenshot with the workflow you > are trying to achieve it will provide more arguments for supporting it? It's mostly for gaming purposes. Without naming any specific one, some games on wine don't handle alt+tabbing all that well when using a proper full screen mode. So, windowed full screen is a workaround that gets used. But then come the issues of how to allocate screen space, especially when the game in question wants to run at, let's say, 2560x1440 exactly. With an always visible panel, the effective screen space is more like 2560x1388 so some of the pixels on some border have to be sacrificed or a smaller resolution to be used. Let's say the next smallest available resolution is 1920x1080. It's a substantial loss in the area the window can take on the screen, just to have it all there. And let's say the game is heavy on mouse-use and doesn't lock it into the center of the screen. Then even an auto-hiding panel hardly does the job since your mouse will go over the revealing screen edge, let's say for moving the camera purposes. In other situations I prefer to have the panel always visible, so an easy way to hide and unhide it without taking up screen estate is what seems to be what would work best. I did think that, despite the premise of the On Demand Sidebar, it would also work for me to add a dbus method to toggle the hidden state of an always visible bar. But then it would be so hidden of a thing nobody is going to even find it other than those already in the know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
