[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 soredake changed: What|Removed |Added CC|katyaberezy...@gmail.com| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 Harald Sitter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sit...@kde.org Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #15 from Harald Sitter --- Seems to work well on latest fedora kde (after I removed the backend because it is installed by default ;)) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #14 from soredake --- Same on fedora kde 36, log https://pastebin.com/NFxEVcpR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #13 from soredake --- Still a problem with fedora kde 35. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #12 from soredake --- Same in Fedora KDE 33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #11 from soredake --- Created attachment 135825 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135825&action=edit plasma-discover log from kubuntu 21.04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #10 from soredake --- Same problem but on kubuntu, missing backends just hidden. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 soredake changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 Mustafa Muhammad changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED --- Comment #9 from Mustafa Muhammad --- Sorry for the delay, on new installation of Fedora 33, Discover has no "Missing Backends" part, even though the snap backend (plasma-discover-snap) is not installed. Nowadays Fedora ship flatpak backend by default, so not sure if this (hiding the "Missing Backends") is the intended behaviour. Regards Mustafa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #8 from Bug Janitor Service --- Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDSINFO status with no change in 30 days the bug will be closed as RESOLVED > WORKSFORME due to lack of needed information. For more information about our bug triaging procedures please read the wiki located here: https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as REPORTED so that the KDE team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 Justin Zobel changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO CC||justin.zo...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Justin Zobel --- I don't have a Fedora machine setup, can you please test with Fedora 33. Can you please test and confirm if this issue is still occurring or if this bug report can be marked as resolved. I've set the bug status to "needsinfo" pending your response, please change back to "reported" or "resolved" when you respond, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter --- May be relevant, getting this error too (that disappears almost too quick to notice): "Please make sure that Appstream is properly setup on your system" console showing: Could not open the AppStream metadata pool "" $ appstreamcli search plasma-discover works and shows results, so it's not completely non-functional $ sudo appstreamcli refresh-cache seems to have fixed the startup warning (for now), so maybe not relevant after all. original issue remains after that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- Testing with: qt5-qtbase-5.11.1-9.fc29 kf5-kirigami2-5.52.0-1.fc29 PackageKit-1.1.11-1.fc29 plasma-discover-5.14.3-1.fc29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter --- So I *can* reproduce this on my f29 box, interesting, though my findings are slightly different: removing plasma-discover-flatpak, and (re)running plasma-discover. First try, behavior difference(s) from f28: * startup is fast (good), no sign of the many transactions seen before * settings displays no information about backends at all (only available repositories) second try, first do: $ pkcon refresh force while that is going, run plasma-discover, initially settings showed the backend info and no repositories shown. Once the repositories displayed, the backend info disappeared again :( doing more tests, but it does appear to be fairly reproducible on fedora 29 alright. It may be because fedora 29 has a higher number of available repositories to be shown compared to f28 (I have 47 listed on my box, including rpmfusion). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- (Though I just tested on f28, I'll retry on f29 soon) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- This worked for me last I tested with 5.13.x Retesting with 5.14.3 now... Other than slow startup (seems to spawn ~70+ packagekit transactions initially, according to 'pkmon'), once that's done, going to settings -> missing backends , clicking install next to "Discover -l Flatpak backend" finishes rather quickly without incident. (repeated test twice, manually removing the plasma-discover-flatpak package prior to each test) So in short, I cannot reproduce what's been reported here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Discover] [Bug 401300] Discover can't install missing flatpak backend in Fedora
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401300 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Nate Graham --- Hmm, feels like maybe a distro packaging issue... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
