[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #23 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- Fixed with #384396 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Version Fixed In||7.2.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #22 from Kartik --- Gilles, this bug report may be closed now. Here's the new Feature in case anyone's interested to see: https://imgur.com/a/CKVopzi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #21 from alain.pouchard1...@free.fr --- Hello Thank you very much, as soon as there is an online version I will test. See you again and again thank you Le 04/07/2020 à 14:54, Kartik a écrit : > Just to update, storing maps of tag regions to suggested names is definitely > feasible. I'll go forward with this approach to implement categorization based > on Suggested Names. This will lead to categorization of similar looking faces > together. > > Kartik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #20 from Kartik --- Just to update, storing maps of tag regions to suggested names is definitely feasible. I'll go forward with this approach to implement categorization based on Suggested Names. This will lead to categorization of similar looking faces together. Kartik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #19 from Kartik --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #17) > The digiKam Icon View knows categories. I would find it better if the person > name is the category and thus the people are grouped. That would be much > clearer. I do like this idea. However, I don't think this would work for images with multiple faces. When categorizing items (faces in our case) the ItemInfo is passed to the various sorting functions. Different faces (in the same image) share the same ItemInfo. Even if I store face suggestions in each ItemInfo, given an ItemInfo it's tough to know which face called it. I'll have to think of a work-around for this. Maybe I could store a Map of Face Regions to Suggested Faces, and somehow pass Face Regions to the categorizing algorithm as well? Kartik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #18 from Maik Qualmann --- *** Bug 421985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metzping...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Maik Qualmann --- The digiKam Icon View knows categories. I would find it better if the person name is the category and thus the people are grouped. That would be much clearer. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #16 from MarcP --- Hi Kartik. This is quite ambitious! Since digikam can already "group" pictures, why not just grouping them by similarity inside Unknown/Unconfirmed, without creating subtags? When the user enters Unknown/Unconfirmed, they will see all the groups (the groups with the most people could be showed first), and then they could enter a name (or confirm the suggestion). The user could also expand or collapse a particular group to see the containing pictures. Although I believe that the "group" option is disabled for faces. Another issue will be obtaining the similarity value. I guess that every new face that is detected should be compared with the rest of the faces in the Unknown/Unconfirmed categories and, if the similarity is superior to 0.95 (for instance), then add that face to the group. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 Kartik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Kartik --- Hello all, I would like to work on this bug. I noticed that Google Photos resolves this in a very efficient manner, it does not show you the entire "Unknown" Collection, instead only individual collections of people that are currently unknown, but the algorithm has concluded to be the same. Maybe this is something we can incorporate into DigiKam? I was thinking of creating a hierarchy within the Unknown tag, where each sub-tag will display face-tags of people that are similar (or the same). The user could reject if the person is not the same as the rest, in which case the person would move into the misc. unknown tag. There are a few issues to this, firstly I'm not sure whether it's ideal to create a hierarchy within the unknown tag, furthermore, I'm not sure what I'd name these subtags. I'd be grateful for any suggestions regarding this. Thanks Kartik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #14 from MarcP --- (I have opened a feature request for the hide/show confirmed faces, so it is registered in the bugtracking system. It is bug 417399) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #13 from MarcP --- No, showing only unconfirmed faces for a person (there's current bug report for that), or automatically grouping unconfirmed faces for similarity (this bug report) are features that have not been yet implemented. And rejecting a suggestion still deletes the face region instead of sending that face back to the "Unknown" category (this is bug 384485) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #12 from Jens --- I looked at 7.0.0beta2. It seems the new engine better separates unconfirmed and confirmed faces, and also displays unconfirmed faces with the respective people's tag (and a prominent border). Right? However, I cannot find a way to show *only* unconfirmed faces (they are sprinkled between confirmed faces, of which there are many), and I cannot find a way to say "This is a face, but it's not *this* one" to remove a face from the "Unconfirmed" group of faces, but keep the tag. So far, I also cannot see unknown faces, or images in general, being groupable by similarity. Yet. Is this feature hidden somewhere? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 --- Comment #11 from Maik Qualmann --- *** Bug 417390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nic...@tuxfamily.org --- Comment #10 from Maik Qualmann --- *** Bug 415878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 384396] Display faces sorted by similarity (pre-grouped) instead of album/time/..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wish: display faces sorted |Display faces sorted by |by similarity (pre-grouped) |similarity (pre-grouped) |instead of album/time/..|instead of album/time/.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
