[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

Maik Qualmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Maik Qualmann  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 374180 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|5.9.0   |7.0.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[MarcP]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

--- Comment #5 from MarcP  ---
This issue is still present. But it will be hard to "solve" due to how digikam
understands face tags.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

--- Comment #4 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 7.0.0 stable release is now published:

https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-07-19-7.0.0_release_announcement/

We need a fresh feedback on this file using this version.

Best Regards

Gilles Caulier

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

--- Comment #3 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
7.0.0-beta1 is out with new Face Recognition algorithm based on Deep
Learning/Neural Network API from OpenCV

https://download.kde.org/unstable/digikam/

Please test and give us a feedback

Thanks in advance
Gilles Caulier

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[IWBR]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

--- Comment #2 from IWBR  ---
Well, in my case, the picture library is shared among several family members,
where each can use different software to edit and manage the collection, so as
long as changes are saved in the metadata and scanned when you first start your
picture manager, there should be no problem. (Btw, currently not 100% possible
with digikam, because of bug #380876 where the database is not properly updated
after a scan)

Now, in pictures where someone appears, they are tagged with that person's
name. In addition to that, some face recognition software has also identified
people faces and names have been assigned to them and saved in the metadata.
These face regions can be named the same way as an existing tag, but that's not
a problem since these are two completely separate things and should not
interfere.

When I started using digikam a few weeks ago, it scanned the full collection,
and as I see, it merged tags and face regions and treated both as the same
thing. Both are displayed in the "Tag" panel. Although only face-region
pictures are showed in the People tags (this is alright). So in the Tag panel,
there's no way to know which is which. They have even the same icon. I don't
even know if the name under the face region has been written in the metadata as
a regular tag (as names in the regular tag do automatically).

Relevant picture (I posted it before in another bug): https://imgur.com/a/vvPPV
. Some of these tags are regular tags, some of these are face regions, and some
of them have been fused by digikam. I just don't know which are which.

The workaround you mentioned would be to rename all non-face region tags to
something like "John Smith (no face)". But I think this not optimal and would
require overwriting hundreds of gigabytes of data, and could be inconvenient to
the rest of users.

Simply showing tags and face tags separately, even if they're in the same list
with a different icon, would help.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

Maik Qualmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||metzping...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann  ---
If you have duplicate tag names, why not just rename? You will then see if it
was used in your previous software as a face tag or keyword. If you are unsure,
create a small test collection under a new user account.

Maik

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Faces-Maintenance   |Faces-Workflow
 CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 392020] No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been face-tagged

[IWBR]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020

IWBR  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.