[digikam] [Bug 418380] Use different checkbox for 'must not have this tag'

2023-01-16 Thread MarcP
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418380

MarcP  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 418380] Use different checkbox for 'must not have this tag'

2020-11-29 Thread Mike Morrison
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418380

--- Comment #3 from Mike Morrison  ---
Alternatively, a checkmark "✓" and "X" mark could represent the two states,
rather than plus and minus. Minus and/or plus signs within the boxes have the
potential to look like expandable hierarchy disclosure widgets, which often
also look like + and - within squares:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/uxguide/ctrl-progressive-disclosure-controls#plus-and-minus-controls

A minus sign within a checkbox is also sometimes used to represent an
indeterminate or mixed state, as when some but not all of an object's child
objects have an option set. Example of this use from Gmail (when managing
labels on multiple selected messages) is attached.

Here is an example of a three-state checkbox using both color and ✓/X marks to
indicate filter inclusion and exclusion, very much like the use case for tag
filters in digiKam. A runnable CodePen example is included:
https://medium.com/@carsonf92/introducing-the-three-state-checkbox-1b6f00b6ec89

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 418380] Use different checkbox for 'must not have this tag'

2020-11-29 Thread Mike Morrison
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418380

--- Comment #2 from Mike Morrison  ---
Created attachment 133733
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133733&action=edit
Example of minus sign within checkbox representing mixed state

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 418380] Use different checkbox for 'must not have this tag'

2020-11-29 Thread Mike Morrison
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418380

--- Comment #1 from Mike Morrison  ---
I like the minus sign for "Must not have". Additionally, the checkmark could be
replaced by a plus sign for "Must have".

Perhaps color (green/red) could also be used to indicate the status of each
tag.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 418380] Use different checkbox for 'must not have this tag'

2020-04-14 Thread Mike Morrison
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418380

Mike Morrison  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@mikemorr.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.