[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-19 Thread Thomas Baumgart via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

--- Comment #11 from Thomas Baumgart  ---
No, unfortunately it is not that easy. Additional code needs to be written in
an area that is not maintained anymore. Means, I am currently planning to
rewrite it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-19 Thread harry bennett via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

--- Comment #10 from harry bennett  ---
Are you implying that it may be as simple as just 'enabling' it?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-19 Thread Thomas Baumgart via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

--- Comment #9 from Thomas Baumgart  ---
The underlying storage design allows a "payee per split" but it is currently
not used by the application (split transaction editor).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-18 Thread Jack via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

--- Comment #8 from Jack  ---
Interestingly I just ran into this - I had made a deposit earlier in the year,
including checks I received from three different sources.  I had a great deal
of trouble finding that transaction, since searching by payee obviously didn't
work, since the three payees were not mentioned in the transaction.  I only
found it by a text search.
I don't know what proper bookkeeping would require here, but I think the real
user need is just simplicity in data entry, and having a single split for the
bank deposit side, so it matches the bank statement.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-03 Thread Christian David via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

Christian David  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #7 from Christian David  ---
That sounds reasonable to me. Changing it won't be easy but whoever wants to do
it has my support. Although the usability of our split system is a couple of
decades beyond, so a rework could be interesting anyway.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-01 Thread harry bennett via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

harry bennett  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|allow splits on payees  |allow different payees on
   ||splits

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[kmymoney4] [Bug 342401] allow different payees on splits

2016-02-01 Thread harry bennett via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401

--- Comment #6 from harry bennett  ---
FYI: I changed the heading on the bug to better reflect what I mean

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.