[okular] [Bug 481266] [wish] pdf signing, okular can use openPGP certificcate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481266 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||aa...@kde.org Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG --- Comment #4 from Albert Astals Cid --- We're not going to do that. An okular only feature is not useful, and a self signed certificate is not useful. For that level of not actual cryptographically-valid signature you can as well just add a stamp annotation with your signature as an image and call it signed, that's what most people want anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[okular] [Bug 481266] [wish] pdf signing, okular can use openPGP certificcate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481266 --- Comment #3 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #2) > In this case, it would be a good thing that Okular, at the first opening, > creates automatically an S/MIME OpenPGP certificate with Kleopatra. In general, S/Mime (x509) certificates needs to be authorized/notarized by a 3rd party (not unlike how browser https security works), so just generating something is not going to be useful in the long run. For example, in certain countries, you can get a governmental issued certificate with a government organization as trust anchor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[okular] [Bug 481266] [wish] pdf signing, okular can use openPGP certificcate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481266 --- Comment #2 from Philippe ROUBACH --- Ok In this case, it would be a good thing that Okular, at the first opening, creates automatically an S/MIME OpenPGP certificate with Kleopatra. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[okular] [Bug 481266] [wish] pdf signing, okular can use openPGP certificcate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481266 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Hi This is not specified in the pdf specification, so it would be a purely okular-to-okular feature. While it probably wouldn't be many man weeks of work to implement something that works, given it is not actually specified in the pdf spec, I don't think it is useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
