[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #10 from Philippe Waroquiers--- (In reply to David Hallas from comment #9) > So, should I go ahead and close the bug now that a testcase has been added? Status was changed to RESOLVED/FIXED which seems to be the final status of valgrind bugs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #9 from David Hallas--- So, should I go ahead and close the bug now that a testcase has been added? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #8 from Philippe Waroquiers--- (In reply to David Hallas from comment #7) > I have attached a reduced test case that shows the problem. I have tested > with gcc-4.9.3 and clang-3.7.1 using a 64bit Linux PC. I compiled it like > this: > > g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp -o test > > I also verified that the latest master fixes the problem. > > Let me know if there is anything else you need Thanks for the test case. Test added in revision 15799 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #7 from David Hallas--- I have attached a reduced test case that shows the problem. I have tested with gcc-4.9.3 and clang-3.7.1 using a 64bit Linux PC. I compiled it like this: g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp -o test I also verified that the latest master fixes the problem. Let me know if there is anything else you need -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #6 from David Hallas--- Created attachment 97251 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97251=edit Reduced test case -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #5 from Philippe Waroquiers--- (In reply to David Hallas from comment #4) > I can try :) What would the format of a testcase be? Would a C++ code > snippet be good enough? A small compilable testcase c++ is ok. Bonus points if the testcase consists in a single file. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 --- Comment #4 from David Hallas--- I can try :) What would the format of a testcase be? Would a C++ code snippet be good enough? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 Ivo Raisrchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||iv...@ivosh.net --- Comment #3 from Ivo Raisr --- David, please provide a small test case as Philippe suggested. That would be highly appreciated! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 David Hallaschanged: What|Removed |Added CC||da...@davidhallas.dk --- Comment #2 from David Hallas --- Hi Philippe, I tested with the latest HEAD and it works! Thanks a lot for fixing this issue, it is greatly appreciated. Should I go ahead and close the bug or what is the workflow? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 Philippe Waroquierschanged: What|Removed |Added CC||philippe.waroquiers@skynet. ||be --- Comment #1 from Philippe Waroquiers --- Fixed in revision 15787. Note: the fix was tested by temporarily changing the pool size to a very small value. It would be nice if you could produce a small test case which has a string > 64 Kb, so as to have a regression test for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133 Philippe Waroquierschanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.