[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-20 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #10 from Philippe Waroquiers  ---
(In reply to David Hallas from comment #9)
> So, should I go ahead and close the bug now that a testcase has been added?

Status was changed to RESOLVED/FIXED which seems to be the final status of
valgrind bugs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-18 Thread David Hallas via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #9 from David Hallas  ---
So, should I go ahead and close the bug now that a testcase has been added?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-18 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #8 from Philippe Waroquiers  ---
(In reply to David Hallas from comment #7)
> I have attached a reduced test case that shows the problem. I have tested
> with gcc-4.9.3 and clang-3.7.1 using a 64bit Linux PC. I compiled it like
> this:
> 
> g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp -o test
> 
> I also verified that the latest master fixes the problem.
> 
> Let me know if there is anything else you need

Thanks for the test case.
Test added in revision 15799

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-16 Thread David Hallas via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #7 from David Hallas  ---
I have attached a reduced test case that shows the problem. I have tested with
gcc-4.9.3 and clang-3.7.1 using a 64bit Linux PC. I compiled it like this:

g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp -o test

I also verified that the latest master fixes the problem.

Let me know if there is anything else you need

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-16 Thread David Hallas via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #6 from David Hallas  ---
Created attachment 97251
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97251=edit
Reduced test case

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-15 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #5 from Philippe Waroquiers  ---
(In reply to David Hallas from comment #4)
> I can try :) What would the format of a testcase be? Would a C++ code
> snippet be good enough?
A small compilable testcase c++ is ok.
Bonus points if the testcase consists in a single file.
Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-14 Thread David Hallas via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

--- Comment #4 from David Hallas  ---
I can try :) What would the format of a testcase be? Would a C++ code snippet
be good enough?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-14 Thread Ivo Raisr via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

Ivo Raisr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||iv...@ivosh.net

--- Comment #3 from Ivo Raisr  ---
David, please provide a small test case as Philippe suggested.
That would be highly appreciated!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-14 Thread David Hallas via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

David Hallas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||da...@davidhallas.dk

--- Comment #2 from David Hallas  ---
Hi Philippe,

I tested with the latest HEAD and it works! Thanks a lot for fixing this issue,
it is greatly appreciated.
Should I go ahead and close the bug or what is the workflow?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-14 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

Philippe Waroquiers  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||philippe.waroquiers@skynet.
   ||be

--- Comment #1 from Philippe Waroquiers  ---
Fixed in revision 15787.

Note: the fix was tested by temporarily changing the pool size to a very small
value.
It would be nice if you could produce a small test case which has a string > 64
Kb, so
as to have a regression test for this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


[valgrind] [Bug 359133] m_deduppoolalloc.c:258 (vgPlain_allocEltDedupPA): Assertion 'eltSzB <= ddpa->poolSzB' failed.

2016-02-14 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359133

Philippe Waroquiers  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.