[valgrind] [Bug 455279] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xD2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xC8 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455279 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabrav...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 455279] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xD2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xC8 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455279 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 383010 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 455279] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xD2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xC8 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455279 --- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes --- Ah it's an EVEX prefix now but the opcode map in the Intel manual helpfully doesn't mention that... There is no AVX512 support in valgrind currently so you can't run code that is compiled to use AVX512 instructions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 455279] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xD2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xC8 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455279 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@compton.nu --- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes --- Well 0x62 is a BOUND instruction, or it would be in 32 bit mode, but it's not valid in 64 bit mode. Did you get any warnings from valgrind before that about referencing undefined values? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
