[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes --- *** Bug 480680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@klomp.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- Gentoo, Debian and Fedora already pulled in this patch. Now also added to VALGRIND_3_22_BRANCH: commit 41ff9aa49f6c54c66d0e6b37f265fd9cb0176057 Author: Paul Floyd Date: Sun Dec 17 14:18:51 2023 +0100 Bug 478624 - Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26) It was a bit of a struggle to get the testcase to build with both clang and gcc (oddly enough gcc was more difficult) so I just resorted to using .byte arrays. (cherry picked from commit d35005cef8ad8207542738812705ceabf137d7e0) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624
--- Comment #2 from Paul Floyd ---
Should be fixed with this. Can someone check with the latest binutils?
commit d35005cef8ad8207542738812705ceabf137d7e0 (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD, gnu_binutils_nop)
Author: Paul Floyd
Date: Sun Dec 17 14:18:51 2023 +0100
Bug 478624 - Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new
nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
It was a bit of a struggle to get the testcase to build
with both clang and gcc (oddly enough gcc was more difficult) so
I just resorted to using .byte arrays.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://bugs.debian.org/1057 ||693 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86 with new nop patterns (unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Valgrind incompatibility|Valgrind incompatibility |with binutils-2.42 on x86 |with binutils-2.42 on x86 ||with new nop patterns ||(unhandled instruction ||bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 478624] Valgrind incompatibility with binutils-2.42 on x86
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- For a testcase we probably should just have a simple assembly/byte sequence of all the "nops" used in https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/gas/config/tc-i386.c#n1256 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
