On Wednesday 28 June 2006 18:07, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 17:37, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
But does that mean to insert the BSD copyright header in every tiny cmake
file ?
Well, in every file somebody else could copy over. another possibility
would be to add a special exception clause, like autoconf does:
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
I'm not sure which variant is better.
This is so much text, simply using the BSD license is better and easier to
understand I'd say.
What about when such modules go into cmake cvs ?
cmake itself is licensed under BSD, can the BSD license then removed from the
files ?
Bye
Alex
--
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org- http://www.kde.org
alex AT neundorf.net - http://www.neundorf.net
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
