Re: Replacement of notes.kde.org
Hi sysadmins, so we gave it another shot during last weeks meeting. This time with 4 people. It was slow/laggy as fuck. Way worse than last time (with 2 people) to the point were it was unusable. We had to switch back to notes.kde.org which ran smoothöly and was exactly what we needed. I urge you to consider staying with what is running on notes.k.o for now because CODE is not a viable replacement for the meeting-notetaking usecase at the moment. Michael Meeks from Colabora promised in a private mail that the next version of CODE will perform way better. I am happy to reevaluate CODE when the next version is out but at this time CODE is not usable or us. Could you elaborate why you want to get rid of etherpad? Kind regards, Michael
Re: Kubuntu and other KDE distribution's use of KDE infrastructure
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 16:28:45 GMT, Albert Astals Cid wrote: For me, the line is "you should use your project infrastructure". Since we're nice people, i would expand the line to "if your project infrastructure is not good you can use ours for KDE related stuff if that gives us no overhead" I think this really depends a lot on the size and organisation abilities/facilities of the distro in question. Basically there is Debian/Fedora/OpenSUSE and then pretty much everyone else who have less resources, so I think this should remain a semi flexible grey area. IMHO it always seems to be people involved in distros with lots of resources saying that other distros should never get the occasional helping hand from KDE -- Kenny
