Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?
On Freitag, 28. Mai 2021 12:36:35 CEST Andrius Štikonas wrote: > 2021 m. gegužės 28 d., penktadienis 11:25:49 BST Harald Sitter rašė: > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: > > > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion > > > >> period)> > > > > > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source. > > > > > > +1. I think we should support free and open source software. > > > > I do too. I'm curious though: How does using the 4 year old software > > support the software more than using the eventually 4 year old > > software? > > By the way, isn't it 3 year old software. That probably doesn't > fundamentally change the discussion. Although, if you use Debian stable or > Centos, you probably are using a lot of 3 year old software. Sure, but in Debian and Centos security fixes (for officially maintained packages) are backported. Are security fixes backported for the now Apache-2.0 licensed versions of Sentry? Regards, Ingo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?
2021 m. gegužės 28 d., penktadienis 11:25:49 BST Harald Sitter rašė: > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: > > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion > > >> period) > > > > > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source. > > > > > > > +1. I think we should support free and open source software. > > I do too. I'm curious though: How does using the 4 year old software > support the software more than using the eventually 4 year old > software? > > HS > By the way, isn't it 3 year old software. That probably doesn't fundamentally change the discussion. Although, if you use Debian stable or Centos, you probably are using a lot of 3 year old software. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion > >> period) > > > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source. > > > > +1. I think we should support free and open source software. I do too. I'm curious though: How does using the 4 year old software support the software more than using the eventually 4 year old software? HS
Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?
On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion period) > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source. > +1. I think we should support free and open source software. /Sune
