Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Eike Hein
We've been offered free Ultimate in the past, but decided it's better to 
bargain together with others in the community (e.g. Gnome) for a 
better-featured free software version.

I still think that's a good use of our collective sway.



Eike

Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Ben Bonacci
I assumed this would only be available for projects on the official 
GitLab instance, but it appears to also be available for self hosted 
instances too if all the requirements are met.


https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/open-source/join/

Although KDE may qualify for it, if it means migrating from CE to EE 
(the non-free version of GitLab) then it would need to be considered if  
Ultimate's features are worth using the proprietary version of GitLab.


Personally, using EE to host free software doesn't seem right.


Regards,

Ben

On 3/8/23 00:40, Harald Sitter wrote:

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:35 PM  wrote:

On 2023-08-02 16:26, Harald Sitter wrote:

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker  wrote:

On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:

On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:

I don't think so

As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
organization doing free software.

I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
enough.

It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.

No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to
make their
dashboard available to everyone.

I'll not stop you :)
Until that happens the argument stands.

Hi,

I don't think using commercial non-free solutions as the primary tool
for our development
is a good idea.

Beside that, that is billed per user: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/

e.g. $1188 USD per year per non-guest user

That looks like a lot money to pay given we have more than 10 users,
even if it
has less costs if you buy xxx accounts.

It is my understanding that they are giving it away for free to free
software projects.

HS


--
Ben Bonacci
https://benbonacci.com
C0A9 E67F 8CDC B1A1 0860 1807 E018 065C C7DF 3976

Quote of the Day: "Not all those who wander are lost." - Marthe Troly-Curtin



Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Fathi Boudra
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:41 PM Harald Sitter  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:35 PM  wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-08-02 16:26, Harald Sitter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> > >> > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > >> > > > I don't think so
> > >> > >
> > >> > > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> > >> > > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> > >> > > organization doing free software.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> > >> > > enough.
> > >> >
> > >> > It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
> > >> > spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
> > >> > defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
> > >> > time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.
> > >>
> > >> No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to
> > >> make their
> > >> dashboard available to everyone.
> > >
> > > I'll not stop you :)
> > > Until that happens the argument stands.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't think using commercial non-free solutions as the primary tool
> > for our development
> > is a good idea.
> >
> > Beside that, that is billed per user: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
> >
> > e.g. $1188 USD per year per non-guest user
> >
> > That looks like a lot money to pay given we have more than 10 users,
> > even if it
> > has less costs if you buy xxx accounts.
>
> It is my understanding that they are giving it away for free to free
> software projects.

It's worth double checking. I've been running a gitlab instance for an
open source project using the free version for the last 3 years.
The free/opensource version comes with no support from gitlab. Last
time I checked, using the ultimate version will require paying users
licenses but you get support (included in this package).
Depending on the features set, you can reduce the bill to get the
premium version (however, we don't get the "free guest users") instead
of ultimate.

I'll suggest getting in touch with them and clarify the costs, as they
can negotiate on a case by case basis. If my experience serves,
nothing is free with gitlab. It isn't a non-profit organization.

> HS


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimecres, 2 d’agost de 2023, a les 15:44:48 (CEST), Harald Sitter va 
escriure:
> I don't think so

This seems to disqualify it, I don't think it makes any sense to use non Free 
Software to something as core as code hosting.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:39 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > > Ahoy!
> > > 
> > > How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free
> > > version?
> > 
> > Is it free software ?
> > 
> > https://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
> > 
> > /Sune






Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Agustin Benito (toscalix)
Hello Harald,

Over the years, we have had similar discussions like this one, that
is, convenience vs principles, several times. You can check "Official
KDE mirror on github", around Sept. 2015, on this mailing list, for
reference. You will find some of the arguments that both parties can
put on the table there, with the corresponding counter arguments, if I
remember correctly. I remember learning a lot from that discussion.

Link: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2015q3/001507.html

Different times bring different perspectives to the same arguments
but, since this discussion involves principles, I doubt that much has
changed. So do not be surprised if "principles" beat "convenience"
once again.

Now, if there is pain that developers feel every day, it is more
productive to open a debate focused on mitigating that pain in a way
that is compatible with our principles. Hopefully you will find
support there. So my question to you is...

What is the pain you would like to reduce or that process you would
like to improve to become more productive?


On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:41 PM Harald Sitter  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:35 PM  wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-08-02 16:26, Harald Sitter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> > >> > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > >> > > > I don't think so
> > >> > >
> > >> > > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> > >> > > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> > >> > > organization doing free software.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> > >> > > enough.
> > >> >
> > >> > It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
> > >> > spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
> > >> > defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
> > >> > time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.
> > >>
> > >> No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to
> > >> make their
> > >> dashboard available to everyone.
> > >
> > > I'll not stop you :)
> > > Until that happens the argument stands.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't think using commercial non-free solutions as the primary tool
> > for our development
> > is a good idea.
> >
> > Beside that, that is billed per user: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
> >
> > e.g. $1188 USD per year per non-guest user
> >
> > That looks like a lot money to pay given we have more than 10 users,
> > even if it
> > has less costs if you buy xxx accounts.
>
> It is my understanding that they are giving it away for free to free
> software projects.
>
> HS

Best Regards

Agustin Benito (toscalix)
KDE eV member
Profile: http://www.toscalix.com


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Harald Sitter
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:35 PM  wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-02 16:26, Harald Sitter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> >> > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> >> > > > I don't think so
> >> > >
> >> > > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> >> > > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> >> > > organization doing free software.
> >> > >
> >> > > I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> >> > > enough.
> >> >
> >> > It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
> >> > spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
> >> > defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
> >> > time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.
> >>
> >> No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to
> >> make their
> >> dashboard available to everyone.
> >
> > I'll not stop you :)
> > Until that happens the argument stands.
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think using commercial non-free solutions as the primary tool
> for our development
> is a good idea.
>
> Beside that, that is billed per user: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
>
> e.g. $1188 USD per year per non-guest user
>
> That looks like a lot money to pay given we have more than 10 users,
> even if it
> has less costs if you buy xxx accounts.

It is my understanding that they are giving it away for free to free
software projects.

HS


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread christoph

On 2023-08-02 16:26, Harald Sitter wrote:

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker  wrote:


On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > > I don't think so
> >
> > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> > organization doing free software.
> >
> > I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> > enough.
>
> It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
> spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
> defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
> time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.

No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to 
make their

dashboard available to everyone.


I'll not stop you :)
Until that happens the argument stands.


Hi,

I don't think using commercial non-free solutions as the primary tool 
for our development

is a good idea.

Beside that, that is billed per user: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/

e.g. $1188 USD per year per non-guest user

That looks like a lot money to pay given we have more than 10 users, 
even if it

has less costs if you buy xxx accounts.

Greetings
Christoph



HS


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Harald Sitter
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker  wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > > > I don't think so
> > >
> > > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> > > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> > > organization doing free software.
> > >
> > > I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> > > enough.
> >
> > It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
> > spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
> > defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
> > time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.
>
> No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to make their
> dashboard available to everyone.

I'll not stop you :)
Until that happens the argument stands.

HS


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
> > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > > I don't think so
> > 
> > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> > organization doing free software.
> > 
> > I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> > enough.
> 
> It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
> spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
> defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
> time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.

No, it's a pretty compelling reason to convince the GitLab folks to make their 
dashboard available to everyone.

Regards,
Ingo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Harald Sitter
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > I don't think so
>
> As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
> important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
> organization doing free software.
>
> I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
> enough.

It is my understanding that non-trivial amounts of time have been
spent on making a CI dashboard that now nobody uses because it is
defunct or some such. In essence we've wasted valuable free software
time. That seems a pretty compelling reason in my book.

HS


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Joshua Goins
> Is it free software ?
> 
> https://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
> 
> /Sune

This is the reason I was given when I asked why we're not using Ultimate 
before. It does sucks that we don't have tools like CI dashboard, and it's 
really unfortunate that GitLab locks it behind a paywall, and as far as I know 
the premium code is also licensed differently 




Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> I don't think so

As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
organization doing free software.

I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
enough.

/Sune



Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Harald Sitter
I don't think so

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:39 PM Sune Vuorela  wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> > Ahoy!
> >
> > How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free version?
>
> Is it free software ?
>
> https://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
>
> /Sune
>


Re: using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter  wrote:
> Ahoy!
>
> How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free version?

Is it free software ?

https://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html

/Sune



using gitlab ultimate

2023-08-02 Thread Harald Sitter
Ahoy!

How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free version?

It'd give us access to some handy dandy features like

- CI dashboard
- multiple MR assignees
- better issue boards
- epics & roadmaps
- dependency scanning support (for our supporting projects written in
ruby, go, python etc)

and that's just off the top of my head!

What do you reckon?

HS


KDE Eco meetup, Wed. 9 August 17-18h UTC | Sustainable Software goal

2023-08-02 Thread Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss
To make progress on the Sustainable Software goal all are invited to 
join the monthly KDE Eco online meetup the second Wednesday of the month 
at 17h UTC.


For August that is already next week: Wed. 9 August!

Ideas under discussion are collected at this pad -- please feel free to 
add ideas of your own:


  https://collaborate.kde.org/s/cactBt4frrfTjbW

Looking forward to seeing many of you there :)

_Overview_

*When*: Wednesday 9 August 17-18h UTC (ics calendar attached)

*Where*: https://meet.kde.org/b/jos-l59-2i1-9yt

*Topic*: open discussion (see pad above)

Cheers,
Joseph

For general information about the Sustainable Software goal, see:

  https://community.kde.org/Goals/Sustainable_Software

Workboard:

  https://invent.kde.org/teams/eco/sustainable-software-goal/-/boards

--
Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss
KDE Internal Communications & KDE Eco Community Manager
OpenPGP: 8FC5 4178 DC44 AD55 08E7 DF57 453E 5746 59A6 C06F
Matrix: @joseph:kde.org

Generally available Monday-Thursday from 10-16h CET/CEST. Outside of 
these times it may take a little longer for me to respond.


KDE Eco: Building Energy-Efficient Free Software!
Website: https://eco.kde.org
Mastodon: @be4foss@floss.socialBEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Mozilla.org/NONSGML Mozilla Calendar V1.1//EN
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T02
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T03
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CREATED:20230720T095915Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230802T120019Z
DTSTAMP:20230802T120019Z
UID:d1212d9e-addf-4a0e-b991-33bd47e06448
SUMMARY:KDE Eco community meetup
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20230809T19
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20230809T20
TRANSP:OPAQUE
LOCATION:https://meet.kde.org/b/jos-l59-2i1-9yt
DESCRIPTION;ALTREP="data:text/html,%3Cbody%3E*When*%3A%20Wednesday%209%20Au
 gust%2017-18h%20UTC%3Cbr%3E%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%3Cbr%3E%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A*Where*%3A
 %20https%3A%2F%2Fmeet.kde.org%2Fb%2Fjos-l59-2i1-9yt%3Cbr%3E%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%
 3Cbr%3E%0A%0A%0A%0A%3Cdiv%3E*Topic*%3A%20open%20discussion%20(see%20pad)%3C
 %2Fdiv%3E%0A%0A%0A%3Cdiv%3E%3Cbr%3E%0A*Pad*%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcollaborate.
 kde.org%2Fs%2FcactBt4frrfTjbW%3C%2Fdiv%3E%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%3Cbr%3E%0A%0A%0
 A%0A%0AFor%20general%20information%20about%20the%20goal%2C%20see%3A%20%0Aht
 tps%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.kde.org%2FGoals%2FSustainable_Software%0A%3Cdiv%3E%3C
 br%3E%0A%3C%2Fdiv%3E%0A%0A%0A%0A%3Cdiv%3EWorkboard%3A%20%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fin
 vent.kde.org%2Fteams%2Feco%2Fsustainable-software-goal%2F-%2Fboards%0A%0A%3
 C%2Fdiv%3E%0A%3C%2Fbody%3E":*When*: Wednesday 9 August 17-18h UTC\n\n*Where
 *: https://meet.kde.org/b/jos-l59-2i1-9yt\n\n*Topic*: open discussion (see
 pad)\n\n*Pad*: https://collaborate.kde.org/s/cactBt4frrfTjbW\n\nFor general
  information about the goal\, see:\nhttps://community.kde.org/Goals/Sustain
 able_Software\n\nWorkboard: https://invent.kde.org/teams/eco/sustainable-so
 ftware-goal/-/boards\n
SEQUENCE:1
X-MOZ-GENERATION:3
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR