Fwd: [Feedback] Amarok

2012-09-12 Thread Bart Cerneels
I would like to help Jurgen fix this but I'm clueless about the
current state of kio-upnp-ms and it's runtime dependency cagibi in
recent KDE releases.
Could anyone enlighten me?

please CC me or I might miss this reply in the torrent of mailing
lists messages.

-- Forwarded message --
From:  jur...@jurgenponds.nl
Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM
Subject: [Feedback] Amarok
To: ama...@kde.org


Jurgen Ponds sent a message using the contact form at
http://amarok.kde.org/en/contact.

Hello

I'am using Amarok a lot. Lately I installed a upnp server (mediatomb
and I want to use Amarok, but i failed to connect to the upnp server.
It shows the message: Unable to create io-slave:
klauncher said: Unknown protocol 'upnp-ms'.
I'am running Fedora 17 with KDE 4.8.
I also looked around no google to find a solution and they all talked
about ms-upnp and kio-server. As far as I know, I have everything
installed to let it work, but still, no upnp servers in my Amarok.

Do I still need to compile kio-upnp-ms myself, or should it work ut f the box?

With kind regards

Jurgen Ponds


Report as inappropriate:
http://amarok.kde.org/en/mollom/report/session/12091170d0014c3b60

___
Amarok mailing list
ama...@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok


Re: Appmenu support for KDE 4.10

2012-09-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 15:24:44 Cedric Bellegarde wrote:
 Not ready IMO for KDE 4.10 due to problems pointed by Alejandro Fiestas
 Olivares in previous mails. But this is really not needed to have appmenu
 support in KDE available.

I have a long TODO list so I can't make promises, but I will try to help you 
out with this, a kick'ass appmenu support is something we really need.

BTW afiestas is just fine... I'm not used to see my full name here (or at 
least skip the second surname xD).

Cheerz !


Re: Broken build of KDE Base Apps and unauthorized increase in dependency

2012-09-12 Thread Dawit A
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Dawit A ada...@kde.org wrote:



 On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:

 Hi Dawit,

 It has come to my attention that since commit
 603a93268efb9d09f8c6255907f46928c651fdbd to kde-baseapps master, the
 build for it has been broken.
 This is due to it depending on new features, present only in the KDE/4.9
 branch.


 That is only a temporary situation. All the changes in the 4.9 branch are
 periodically merged into
 the 4.10 branch by David, but I guess that does not resolve this issue.



 This is problematic because:
 - kde-baseapps depends upon a minimum of 4.7.97 (ie. KDE 4.8) which
 obviously is no longer the case. It depends upon unreleased code.


 Ahh... I was not aware of this was a requirement though I still do not
 understand why we have started insisting on forward compatibility.
 Regardless, I will fix this since it is only a matter of wrapping the code
 with #ifdef.


 - This feature will not be in KDE 4.10 at the moment, because the
 feature was added to KDE/4.9 instead of KDE/4.10 as it should have
 been.


 It is not a new feature. It is a bug fix. It is needed to fix the
 directory filter plugin for Konqueror.


First, sorry I confused kdelibs with kde-baseapps in this response. So
forget what I said about changes being merged back into 4.10 branch by
David. Anyhow, I have now attempted to fix this issue as reported here. See

http://commits.kde.org/kde-baseapps/f0d5e062bf0452258d337d7dcb2edd2eefa1c37b
.

However this fix does not really work. That is compile will fail if KDE
version is changed to 4.9.2 as well because Qt's moc processor does not
seem to correctly handle #if macros. So my question is whether it would be
acceptable for me to revert this change from the git 4.9 branch and simply
leave it as it was in the git master branch ? IOW, kde-baseapps 4.10
release will have a minimum requirement of kdelibs 4.9.2 ?


Re: Broken build of KDE Base Apps and unauthorized increase in dependency

2012-09-12 Thread Thomas Lübking

Am 12.09.2012, 20:04 Uhr, schrieb Dawit A ada...@kde.org:


Qt's moc processor does not
seem to correctly handle #if macros.


*sigh* not at all is more like it. **GREATSIGH***

You'll have to move the class into an extra header and make it's inclusion  
and moc invocation (latter in cmake) optional.


 DOUBLEGREATSIGH *


Cheers,
Thomas


Re: Broken build of KDE Base Apps and unauthorized increase in dependency

2012-09-12 Thread Allen Winter
On Wednesday 12 September 2012 08:12:58 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
 Am 12.09.2012, 20:04 Uhr, schrieb Dawit A ada...@kde.org:
 
  Qt's moc processor does not
  seem to correctly handle #if macros.
 
 *sigh* not at all is more like it. **GREATSIGH***
 
 You'll have to move the class into an extra header and make it's inclusion  
 and moc invocation (latter in cmake) optional.
 
  DOUBLEGREATSIGH *

Dawit,

I agree with Thomas.  Can you try to put the new class into a separate file?
and then only compile the new file if kde version = 4.9.2




Re: Broken build of KDE Base Apps and unauthorized increase in dependency

2012-09-12 Thread Dawit A
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote:

 On Wednesday 12 September 2012 08:12:58 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
  Am 12.09.2012, 20:04 Uhr, schrieb Dawit A ada...@kde.org:
 
   Qt's moc processor does not
   seem to correctly handle #if macros.
 
  *sigh* not at all is more like it. **GREATSIGH***
 
  You'll have to move the class into an extra header and make it's
 inclusion
  and moc invocation (latter in cmake) optional.
 
   DOUBLEGREATSIGH *

 Dawit,

 I agree with Thomas.  Can you try to put the new class into a separate
 file?
 and then only compile the new file if kde version = 4.9.2


Yes, I can and that is already what I have done locally to workaround the
shortcomings of the moc preprocessor. However, I though I would ask to see
if it would have been acceptable to avoid the addition of new files and use
of conditional macros by changing the minimum kdelibs version requirement
for the kde-baseapps git master repo instead. I guess the consensus is NO
and that is fine by me. I will commit what I have already done.

Regards,
Dawit A.


ANNOUNCE OpenICC @ GSoC 2012 results

2012-09-12 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann

We gladly announce, that OpenICC's participation was this year a
great success. All projects finished. Links to them can be 
found on the OpenICC Google Summer of Code 2012 web page [1].


Colour Management for Krita Printing
Joseph Simon worked on adaption and integration of his last years 
implementation for colour managed printing into Krita. The workflow is 
based on ICC profile injection through the PDF OutputIntent.


KWin Colour Correction
Casian Andrei's KWin changes for ICC style colour correction in the GPU 
are discussed upstream and his code to KolorManager code base wait just 
for approval. The concept follows the X Color Management and CompICC 
implementation. But the result is highly modular and thus very flexible.


Simple Toolkit Abstraction
Nitin Chadas SimpleUI project for XML forms rendering was written from 
ground up and provides now backends for FLTK, Gtk and Qt. It needs a bit

of polishing to become useable.

Thanks to Google for providing the colour management and graphics 
community again a great chance to code and learn the open source way.


kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
--
GSoC admin @ OpenICC.info


[1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/OpenIcc/GoogleSoC2012


PS: interessted in a similar project outside GSoC, then just get
in contact with me