On 2010-12-13 16:48:31, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
How about using vnd.kde.fontspackage instead of x-kde-fontspackage?
Rex Dieter wrote:
I only used x-kde-fontspackage at aaron's suggestion in one of the
aforementioned bugs, I'm not attached to it. vnd.kde.fontspackage is fine
with me too.
Christopher Yeleighton wrote:
How about submitting a registration of application/vnd.kde.fontspackage
to IETF first?
vnd.registrations are just let go.
I could prepare the registration form, but some KDE VIP would have to
sign it.
Rex Dieter wrote:
OK (?), I'm not familiar with that, so any assistance would be
appreciated.
1.
Where is a definitive description of the purpose and the content of the media
type?
2.
All registrations in the KDE domain are submitted by David Fauré; accordingly,
his opinion on the matter would be greatly appreciated.
- Christopher
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/#review9232
---
On 2010-12-13 17:07:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/
---
(Updated 2010-12-13 17:07:48)
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
This patch adjusts the kde fake mimetype fonts/package so
desktop-file-utils/shared-mime-info doesn't complain (using
application/vnd.kde.fontspackage instead). Addresses bugs #235564, #250924
Diffs
-
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/kcontrol/kfontinst/apps/kfontview.desktop
1206154
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/mimetypes/kde.xml 1206154
Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/diff
Testing
---
confirmed no warnings/errors from desktop-file-utils/shared-mime-info
Thanks,
Rex
