Hi,
 
It's great to hear there is some ongoing effort to port KDiff3 to KF5.
Thanks for informing me.
I had a try at it myself, but was quite overwhelmed about the big changes in KF5.
 
You have my blessing to use the name KDiff3.
 
@Michael: It seems the repo at https://bitbucket.org/reporter123/kdiff3
has no public access.
 
Kudos,
Joachim
 
 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 um 22:28 Uhr
Von: "Michael Reeves" <reeves...@gmail.com>
An: "Albert Astals Cid" <aa...@kde.org>
Cc: kde-core-devel@kde.org, "Joachim Eibl" <joachim.e...@gmx.de>
Betreff: Re: KDE inclusion
Sorry meant this to go to everyone.

I did this based off what Ubuntu was using at the time.  The repo is here https://bitbucket.org/reporter123/kdiff3. Master is currently set the require CMake 3.1 but as of this moment that is just a number change. My concern here was C++11 feature dectect which is not implemented in earlier versions. Right now that is not critical. I was not aware of the parallel effort at https://cgit.kde.org/scratch/thomasfischer/kdiff3.git/log/?h=kf5. Command line parsing is fully operational on mine. To my knowledge it is fully operational and I have been using it on my machine. I generally work with two way comparisons.
 
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
El dijous, 11 de gener de 2018, a les 12:15:15 CET, Kevin Funk va escriure:
> On Tuesday, 9 January 2018 21:06:36 CET Michael Reeves wrote:
> > I have a version of kdiff3 that I ported to kf5. I like to what build
> > requirements kf5 as a whole has. Also what would be the process for being
> > considered for inclusion in kde?
>
> Heya,
>
> Note: kdiff3 right now is hosted & developed on SourceForge.
>
> I'd love to see kdiff3 being adopted by KDE again (it former was KDE
> extragear if I understood correctly). kdiff3 is a super useful tool -- and
> right now development has stalled a bit.
>
> Talked to Joachim (the original author) a few weeks ago, where he stated he
> just doesn't have the time maintaining it anymore, really. I've CC'd Joachim
> so he can tell us whether he's okay with having kdiff3 developed further
> under the KDE umbrella.


I guess this is the most important question, if we can keep using the kdiff3
name under's Joachim's blessing or we have to "fork it" and find a new name.

Cheers,
  Albert

>
> I don't really know the process of having it integrated either. I'll leave
> that to others.
>
> Kudos for doing the KF5 port!
>
> Regards,
> Kevin

 

Reply via email to