Re: Minor Point Relase Policy
On Sunday 27 February 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Almost. Before, I was adding new API in the stable branch when necessary for a bugfix, without thinking much about it. Now I'll make a review request, for good measure :-) -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by Nokia to work on KDE, incl. Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org).
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy
On Monday 07 March 2011 23:04:01 David Faure wrote: On Sunday 27 February 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Almost. Before, I was adding new API in the stable branch when necessary for a bugfix, without thinking much about it. Now I'll make a review request, for good measure :-) It says that API changes to public libraries must be approved by kde-core-devel. Shouldn't kdepimlibs changes be approved on the kde-pim list instead? -- David Jarvie. KDE developer. KAlarm author -- http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy
A Dimarts, 8 de març de 2011, David Jarvie va escriure: On Monday 07 March 2011 23:04:01 David Faure wrote: On Sunday 27 February 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Almost. Before, I was adding new API in the stable branch when necessary for a bugfix, without thinking much about it. Now I'll make a review request, for good measure :-) It says that API changes to public libraries must be approved by kde-core-devel. Shouldn't kdepimlibs changes be approved on the kde-pim list instead? This was for more than a month in the release team mailing list. As far as i know the kdepim coordinators read that list, complain to them if you think the text is unfair/incorrect. Albert
Minor Point Relase Policy
Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Albert
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy
On Søndag den 27. februar 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Albert I'm sure you do not mean These releases must only contain: Severe bugs: security vulnerabilities, severe regressions from previous releases, data loss bugs -- Venlig hilsen, Anders
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy
A Diumenge, 27 de febrer de 2011, Anders Lund va escriure: On Søndag den 27. februar 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Albert I'm sure you do not mean These releases must only contain: Severe bugs: security vulnerabilities, severe regressions from previous releases, data loss bugs Added a Fixes for in front. Albert
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy
On Søndag den 27. februar 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: I'm sure you do not mean These releases must only contain: Severe bugs: security vulnerabilities, severe regressions from previous releases, data loss bugs Added a Fixes for in front. Yes, that looks more correct :) -- Venlig hilsen, Anders
