Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-21 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2016-07-20 10:29 GMT+03:00 Ben Cooksley :
> Hi all,
>
> Just as a final reminder, i've yet to see responses from:
>
> - Asplinux

BTW, ASPLinux is no more. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=asp

--
  WBR,
  Vadim Zhukov


Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-19 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Hello,

El viernes, 8 de julio de 2016 23:39:41 (CEST) Ben Cooksley escribió:
> Hi all,
> 
> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
> this contains important details.
> 
> First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
> communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
> missing from there :)

Subscribed

> [snip]
> 
> The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
> distributions, is as follows:
>
> [snip]
> - Siduction
> [snip]

Back in the days I was contributing both to siduction and kubuntu. Today I'm 
not working for siduction anymore but I'm still doing some contributions to 
kubuntu and I need access to the tarballs.

So it would be great if I could get my key into the kubuntu account so you can 
remove the siduction one.

Regards.




Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Michael Palimaka
Hi Ben,

On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
> file and remove any outdated keys.

I confirm that Gentoo is still active. Our primary contacts are:

Johannes Huber 
Michael Palimaka 

We have also reviewed our ~/.ssh/authorized_keys.

Kind regards,

Michael


Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Eric Hameleers

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote:


Hi all,

My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
this contains important details.

First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
missing from there :)

Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
relevant point of contact.

I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
file and remove any outdated keys.

If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.

KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:

## Name 
ssh-rsa

## Next Name

The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
distributions, is as follows:

- Active
- Aix
- Aosc
- Archlinux
- Arklinux
- Asplinux
- Bluewhite64
- Chakra
- Conectiva
- Crux
- Darwin
- Debian
- Exherbo
- Fedora
- FreeBSD
- Gentoo
- Kaos
- Mageia
- Magic
- Mandriva
- Meego
- NetBSD
- OpenBSD
- PCLinuxOS
- PLD
- Redhat
- Rpath
- Siduction
- Slackware
- Slamd64
- SUSE
- Tld
- Tru64
- Tukaani
- Turbo
- Ubuntu
- Uludag
- Uoirix
- Uomandriva
- Uosolaris
- Vine
- Yellow
- Yoper

In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response from.

Thanks,
Ben Cooksley
KDE Sysadmin


I confirm that Slackware is still alive and using the early access to 
the KDE source tarballs.

You can use the following contacts:
Patrick Volkerding 
Eric Hameleers 

Note that as far as I know, Bluewhite64 and Slamd64 (two Slackware 
64bit spinoffs from before Slackware had its own 64bit edition) are 
dead for years now. And Tukaani is no longer a (slackware based) 
distro but now only develops XZ compression tools.


Cheers, Eric

--
Eric Hameleers 
Home: http://alien.slackbook.org/blog/


Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Nicolas Lécureuil

Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit :

Hi all,

My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
this contains important details.

First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
missing from there :)

Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
relevant point of contact.

I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
file and remove any outdated keys.

If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.

KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:

## Name 
ssh-rsa

## Next Name

The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
distributions, is as follows:



- Mageia


We are still active and i am the contact.

--
Regards,
Nicolas Lécureuil
Mageia KDE Team


Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Philip Muskovac

Hi Ben,

for Ubuntu I would be the relevant contact until someone says otherwise 
and we're very much still there ;)


While I'll look at the old keys soon, would it help you if we put a 
#Contact: at the top of the key list? Or do you have another place where 
that can be set?


Philip Muskovac
Kubuntu Developer

Am 08.07.2016 um 13:39 schrieb Ben Cooksley:

Hi all,

My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
this contains important details.

First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
missing from there :)

Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
relevant point of contact.

I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
file and remove any outdated keys.

If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.

KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:

## Name 
ssh-rsa

## Next Name

The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
distributions, is as follows:

- Active
- Aix
- Aosc
- Archlinux
- Arklinux
- Asplinux
- Bluewhite64
- Chakra
- Conectiva
- Crux
- Darwin
- Debian
- Exherbo
- Fedora
- FreeBSD
- Gentoo
- Kaos
- Mageia
- Magic
- Mandriva
- Meego
- NetBSD
- OpenBSD
- PCLinuxOS
- PLD
- Redhat
- Rpath
- Siduction
- Slackware
- Slamd64
- SUSE
- Tld
- Tru64
- Tukaani
- Turbo
- Ubuntu
- Uludag
- Uoirix
- Uomandriva
- Uosolaris
- Vine
- Yellow
- Yoper

In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response from.

Thanks,
Ben Cooksley
KDE Sysadmin




Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Michael Palimaka  wrote:
> Hi Ben,

Hi Michael,

>
> On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
>> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
>> file and remove any outdated keys.
>
> I confirm that Gentoo is still active. Our primary contacts are:
>
> Johannes Huber 
> Michael Palimaka 
>
> We have also reviewed our ~/.ssh/authorized_keys.

Perfect, i've now noted that - thanks for confirming.

>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michael

Cheers,
Ben


Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Eric Hameleers  wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
>> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
>> this contains important details.
>>
>> First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
>> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
>> communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
>> missing from there :)
>>
>> Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
>> per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
>> access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
>> relevant point of contact.
>>
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
>> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
>> file and remove any outdated keys.
>>
>> If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
>> with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
>> sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.
>>
>> KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
>> whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:
>>
>> ## Name 
>> ssh-rsa
>>
>> ## Next Name
>>
>> The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
>> distributions, is as follows:
>>
>> - Active
>> - Aix
>> - Aosc
>> - Archlinux
>> - Arklinux
>> - Asplinux
>> - Bluewhite64
>> - Chakra
>> - Conectiva
>> - Crux
>> - Darwin
>> - Debian
>> - Exherbo
>> - Fedora
>> - FreeBSD
>> - Gentoo
>> - Kaos
>> - Mageia
>> - Magic
>> - Mandriva
>> - Meego
>> - NetBSD
>> - OpenBSD
>> - PCLinuxOS
>> - PLD
>> - Redhat
>> - Rpath
>> - Siduction
>> - Slackware
>> - Slamd64
>> - SUSE
>> - Tld
>> - Tru64
>> - Tukaani
>> - Turbo
>> - Ubuntu
>> - Uludag
>> - Uoirix
>> - Uomandriva
>> - Uosolaris
>> - Vine
>> - Yellow
>> - Yoper
>>
>> In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response
>> from.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben Cooksley
>> KDE Sysadmin
>

Hi Eric,

>
> I confirm that Slackware is still alive and using the early access to the
> KDE source tarballs.
> You can use the following contacts:
> Patrick Volkerding 
> Eric Hameleers 
>
> Note that as far as I know, Bluewhite64 and Slamd64 (two Slackware 64bit
> spinoffs from before Slackware had its own 64bit edition) are dead for years
> now. And Tukaani is no longer a (slackware based) distro but now only
> develops XZ compression tools.

Thanks for confirming that, it's been noted now.
I've closed the accounts for those three distros now (Bluewhite64,
Slamd64, Tukaani) - Distrowatch & their own site confirms that they're
all defunct now.

>
> Cheers, Eric

Thanks,
Ben

>
> --
> Eric Hameleers 
> Home: http://alien.slackbook.org/blog/
>
> ___
> Kde-distro-packagers mailing list
> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-distro-packagers


Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Nicolas Lécureuil
 wrote:
> Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
>> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
>> this contains important details.
>>
>> First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
>> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
>> communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
>> missing from there :)
>>
>> Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
>> per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
>> access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
>> relevant point of contact.
>>
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
>> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
>> file and remove any outdated keys.
>>
>> If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
>> with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
>> sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.
>>
>> KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
>> whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:
>>
>> ## Name 
>> ssh-rsa
>>
>> ## Next Name
>>
>> The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
>> distributions, is as follows:
>
>
>> - Mageia
>
>
> We are still active and i am the contact.

Thanks Nicolas, that's been noted now.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Nicolas Lécureuil
> Mageia KDE Team

Cheers,
Ben