Re: Review Request: kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid

2012-09-05 Thread Commit Hook

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/#review18558
---


This review has been submitted with commit 
48dd1fc50277b861b49613c5f46b6f8b10cc932d by Bernd Buschinski to branch KDE/4.9.

- Commit Hook


On July 6, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Bernd Buschinski wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 6, 2012, 6:30 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid
 
 we currently accept Infinity as a valid date, but its not, we even calc with 
 it,
 which may or may not lead to a result, but always to the wrong result.
 
 The correct way it to just report it as invalid, as we do by remembering it 
 as NaN.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kjs/date_object.cpp 8a1fc2c 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bernd Buschinski
 




Re: Review Request: kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid

2012-07-06 Thread Maks Orlovich

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/#review15458
---



kjs/date_object.cpp
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/#comment12087

Same fix here? (And perhaps in other spots?)

Really, this probably needs some cleanup to not dupe this chunk of code; 
the spec
defines one in terms of the other, after all.


- Maks Orlovich


On June 29, 2012, 6:06 p.m., Bernd Buschinski wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/
 ---
 
 (Updated June 29, 2012, 6:06 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid
 
 we currently accept Infinity as a valid date, but its not, we even calc with 
 it,
 which may or may not lead to a result, but always to the wrong result.
 
 The correct way it to just report it as invalid, as we do by remembering it 
 as NaN.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kjs/date_object.cpp 8a1fc2c 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bernd Buschinski
 




Re: Review Request: kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid

2012-07-06 Thread Bernd Buschinski

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/
---

(Updated July 6, 2012, 6:30 p.m.)


Review request for kdelibs.


Changes
---

kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid  cleanup


Description
---

kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid

we currently accept Infinity as a valid date, but its not, we even calc with it,
which may or may not lead to a result, but always to the wrong result.

The correct way it to just report it as invalid, as we do by remembering it as 
NaN.


Diffs (updated)
-

  kjs/date_object.cpp 8a1fc2c 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Bernd Buschinski



Review Request: kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid

2012-06-29 Thread Bernd Buschinski

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/
---

Review request for kdelibs.


Description
---

kjs: Mark Date Infinity as invalid

we currently accept Infinity as a valid date, but its not, we even calc with it,
which may or may not lead to a result, but always to the wrong result.

The correct way it to just report it as invalid, as we do by remembering it as 
NaN.


Diffs
-

  kjs/date_object.cpp 8a1fc2c 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105387/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Bernd Buschinski