KDE CI: Frameworks » plasma-framework » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 456 - Fixed!

[CI System]

BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/plasma-framework/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/456/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Tue, 18 May 2021 04:42:33 +
 Build duration:
5 min 51 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 11 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 11 test(s)

KDE CI: Frameworks » plasma-framework » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 455 - Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/plasma-framework/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/455/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Tue, 18 May 2021 04:38:18 +
 Build duration:
4 min 2 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 10 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 11 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.plasma_dialogstatetest

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 796 - Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/796/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Tue, 18 May 2021 01:21:53 +
 Build duration:
9 min 32 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 55 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 56 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.commandlauncherjob_scopetestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

KDE CI: Frameworks » plasma-framework » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 454 - Fixed!

[CI System]

BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/plasma-framework/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/454/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 22:30:10 +
 Build duration:
43 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 11 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 11 test(s)

KDE CI: Frameworks » plasma-framework » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 453 - Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/plasma-framework/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/453/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 21:33:46 +
 Build duration:
56 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 10 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 11 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.plasma_dialogstatetest

KDE CI: Frameworks » knewstuff » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 285 - Fixed!

[CI System]

BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/knewstuff/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/285/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 18:44:54 +
 Build duration:
14 min and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5NewStuff-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 2 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 2 test(s)Name: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 3 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 3 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report53%
(8/15)38%
(30/80)38%
(30/80)26%
(2033/7901)22%
(938/4267)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)100%
(52/52)54%
(26/48)autotests.core100%
(3/3)100%
(3/3)99%
(163/165)53%
(64/120)autotests.kmoretools50%
(1/2)50%
(1/2)71%
(202/283)44%
(65/148)src20%
(2/10)20%
(2/10)2%
(22/998)0%
(0/362)src.attica0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/377)0%
(0/205)src.core58%
(14/24)58%
(14/24)35%
(929/2618)30%
(524/1763)src.core.jobs71%
(5/7)71%
(5/7)44%
(133/301)28%
(32/113)src.kmoretools60%
(3/5)60%
(3/5)47%
(422/892)34%
(159/474)src.qtquick0%
(0/11)0%
(0/11)0%
(0/797)0%
(0/413)src.staticxml100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)64%
(110/171)49%
(68/140)src.tools.knewstuff-dialog0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/91)0%
(0/33)src.ui0%
(0/8)0%
(0/8)0%
(0/776)0%
(0/317)src.upload0%
(0/1)0%
(0/1)0%
(0/124)0%
(0/50)tests0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/114)0%
(0/51)tests.kmoretools0%
(0/1)0%
(0/1)0%
(0/142)0%
(0/30)

KDE CI: Frameworks » knewstuff » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 284 - Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/knewstuff/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/284/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 18:20:50 +
 Build duration:
24 min and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5NewStuff-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 2 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 2 test(s)Name: projectroot.autotests Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 2 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 3 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.core.knewstuff_installationtest
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report53%
(8/15)30%
(24/80)30%
(24/80)21%
(1633/7879)17%
(708/4267)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)100%
(52/52)54%
(26/48)autotests.core67%
(2/3)67%
(2/3)41%
(68/164)23%
(27/120)autotests.kmoretools50%
(1/2)50%
(1/2)71%
(202/283)44%
(65/148)src20%
(2/10)20%
(2/10)2%
(22/998)0%
(0/362)src.attica0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/377)0%
(0/205)src.core50%
(12/24)50%
(12/24)26%
(682/2606)19%
(341/1763)src.core.jobs29%
(2/7)29%
(2/7)26%
(75/292)19%
(22/113)src.kmoretools60%
(3/5)60%
(3/5)47%
(422/892)34%
(159/474)src.qtquick0%
(0/11)0%
(0/11)0%
(0/797)0%
(0/413)src.staticxml100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)64%
(110/171)49%
(68/140)src.tools.knewstuff-dialog0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/91)0%
(0/33)src.ui0%
(0/8)0%
(0/8)0%
(0/776)0%
(0/317)src.upload0%
(0/1)0%
(0/1)0%
(0/124)0%
(0/50)tests0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/114)0%
(0/51)tests.kmoretools0%
(0/1)0%
(0/1)0%
(0/142)0%
(0/30)

KDE CI: Frameworks » extra-cmake-modules » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 187 - Fixed!

[CI System]

BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/extra-cmake-modules/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/187/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 15:56:07 +
 Build duration:
5 min 3 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 20 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 20 test(s)Name: projectroot.home.jenkins.workspace.Frameworks.extra-cmake-modules Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.tests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 74 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 74 test(s)Name: projectroot.tests.ECMAddTests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 2 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 2 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  Cobertura Coverage Report

KDE CI: Frameworks » khtml » kf5-qt5 WindowsMSVCQt5.15 - Build # 43 - Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/khtml/job/kf5-qt5%20WindowsMSVCQt5.15/43/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 WindowsMSVCQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 15:22:16 +
 Build duration:
13 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 2 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.khtml_parttest

T14471: Make Qt 5.15.0 to 5.15.2 for frameworks

[Ömer Fadıl Usta]

usta created this task.
usta triaged this task as "Normal" priority.
usta added a project: Frameworks.

TASK DESCRIPTION
  According to Repology[1] all distros who supply qt5.15.x already using 5.15.2 
  and because of API changes on 5.15.2, i believe it will be much
  better to switch 5.15.0 -> 5.15.2 to make things easier such as usage of 
QString append(QStringView str) [2][3]
  
  [1] https://repology.org/project/qt/badges
  [2] https://invent.kde.org/pim/kpimtextedit/-/merge_requests/11#note_233246
  [3] https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#append-5

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/T14471

To: usta
Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, usta, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, ngraham, bruns

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 795 - Fixed!

[CI System]

BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/795/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 14:39:36 +
 Build duration:
37 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 56 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 56 test(s)Name: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 794 - Fixed!

[CI System]

BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/794/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 14:38:06 +
 Build duration:
8 min 29 sec and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5KIO-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 57 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 57 test(s)Name: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report68%
(25/37)69%
(290/423)69%
(290/423)57%
(37179/64872)41%
(19349/46868)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests95%
(59/62)95%
(59/62)91%
(10595/11636)45%
(5433/12162)autotests.http100%
(5/5)100%
(5/5)99%
(503/504)65%
(88/136)autotests.kcookiejar100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)93%
(165/177)70%
(49/70)src100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)89%
(8/9)71%
(10/14)src.core88%
(107/121)88%
(107/121)61%
(9018/14684)52%
(4556/8683)src.core.kssl100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)40%
(35/88)50%
(3/6)src.filewidgets79%
(30/38)79%
(30/38)58%
(5157/8842)46%
(2362/5129)src.gui100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)82%
(699/856)63%
(347/554)src.gui.systemd50%
(2/4)50%
(2/4)4%
(7/173)1%
(1/104)src.ioslaves.file100%
(7/7)100%
(7/7)55%
(759/1375)40%
(452/1134)src.ioslaves.file.kauth0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/179)0%
(0/89)src.ioslaves.ftp100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)47%
(647/1363)37%
(531/1420)src.ioslaves.help0%
(0/5)0%
(0/5)0%
(0/248)0%
(0/148)src.ioslaves.http88%
(7/8)88%
(7/8)42%
(1783/4257)36%
(1318/3642)src.ioslaves.http.kcookiejar40%
(2/5)40%
(2/5)47%
(627/1325)56%
(576/1035)src.ioslaves.remote100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)25%
(55/221)6%

Re: Idea Submission: Does anyone please have con-args?

[slbtty]

> Are there already projects aiming towards similar objectives? Or have there 
> been in the past?

Yes, there are many if you consider euro as a big gov. From my
experience, there are several made-in-china (similar to the
"Self-sovereign identity") systems for past 20 years, and most of them
failed. Wikipedia also have an incomplete page of
state-sponsored-Linux-distros. Most of them wasted a large chunk of
resources to craft just another set of default
packages/wallpapers/theme/infra.

I think region-based distro is anti-pattern of free software. If open
source is about freedom, region-based distro is simply adding
restrictions (Why limit the target users based on geography
location?). It feels like NIH [1] but in large scale.

A common name plus a distro is probably an inspirational symbol, but I
think it might be better to spend more resources on _actual
improvements_ of the software, such as funding software projects that
are actually needed to get the jobs done, enhancing LibreOffice,
translations for rare languages, tools to ease deployments for
gov/school, and develop new technology for open source systems.  Image
KDE get fully funded programmers to improve the software that are
required by euroOS, rather than a team of distro release engineers
tweaking software packages.

What is really needed is a "euroOS project", rather than yet another
region-based "euroOS distro". A project will provide sustainable
funding/resources for software projects that solve real problems for
euro's gov/school/individuals. (If this actually happened, in the
future, someone will use software with acknowledgment that it was
produced/funded by the eurOS Project). Technical issues are less hard
than political/economical ones.

Other thoughts:
* München switch to linux many years ago, but seems to have many
struggling and tried to move back to windows. Not sure the situation
now.
* IIRC, the ScientificLinux was also funded by several euro-based
organizations (mainly CERN I think).
* The recent RockyLinux can be used to estimate how much resources are
practically needed to duplicate everything, plus some branding.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:State-sponsored_Linux_distributions
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here

slbtty


On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:10 AM Dominik Kummer  wrote:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I recently submited an ideas on 
> https://community.kde.org/SoK/Ideas/2021#eurOS%3A_Standard_European_Operating_System
> based on personal conclusions studying several citizen 
> contributions/discussions on futureu.europa.eu.
>
> Do you see any realistic perspectives on this?
> Does it even make sense, or would you consider it to centralized tailored?
> Are there already projects aiming towards similar objectives? Or have there 
> been in the past?
> Whats you opinion on SSI in general?
>
> Thank you so much for any further contra arguments and/or redirections!!
>
> Kind regards, Yours
>
> Dominik
>
>
>

KDE CI: Frameworks » extra-cmake-modules » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 186 - Failure!

[CI System]

${JELLY_SCRIPT,template="html_gmail"}

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 794 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/794/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 13:17:31 +
 Build duration:
10 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 55 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 56 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 793 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/793/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 12:19:23 +
 Build duration:
58 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 55 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 56 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 793 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/793/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 12:26:11 +
 Build duration:
7 min 1 sec and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5KIO-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 56 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 57 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report68%
(25/37)69%
(290/423)69%
(290/423)57%
(37160/64873)41%
(19338/46868)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests95%
(59/62)95%
(59/62)91%
(10599/11636)45%
(5426/12162)autotests.http100%
(5/5)100%
(5/5)99%
(503/504)65%
(88/136)autotests.kcookiejar100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)93%
(165/177)70%
(49/70)src100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)89%
(8/9)71%
(10/14)src.core88%
(107/121)88%
(107/121)61%
(9016/14684)52%
(4556/8683)src.core.kssl100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)40%
(35/88)50%
(3/6)src.filewidgets79%
(30/38)79%
(30/38)58%
(5133/8842)46%
(2354/5129)src.gui100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)82%
(699/856)63%
(347/554)src.gui.systemd50%
(2/4)50%
(2/4)4%
(7/173)1%
(1/104)src.ioslaves.file100%
(7/7)100%
(7/7)55%
(759/1375)40%
(452/1134)src.ioslaves.file.kauth0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/179)0%
(0/89)src.ioslaves.ftp100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)47%
(647/1363)37%
(531/1420)src.ioslaves.help0%
(0/5)0%
(0/5)0%
(0/248)0%
(0/148)src.ioslaves.http88%
(7/8)88%
(7/8)42%
(1783/4257)36%
(1318/3642)src.ioslaves.http.kcookiejar40%
(2/5)40%
(2/5)47%
(627/1325)56%
(576/1035)src.ioslaves.remote100%
(2/2)100%

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 792 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/792/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 12:19:23 +
 Build duration:
6 min 47 sec and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5KIO-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 56 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 57 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report68%
(25/37)69%
(290/423)69%
(290/423)57%
(37153/64872)41%
(19334/46868)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests95%
(59/62)95%
(59/62)91%
(10599/11636)45%
(5433/12162)autotests.http100%
(5/5)100%
(5/5)99%
(503/504)65%
(88/136)autotests.kcookiejar100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)93%
(165/177)70%
(49/70)src100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)89%
(8/9)71%
(10/14)src.core88%
(107/121)88%
(107/121)61%
(9015/14684)52%
(4552/8683)src.core.kssl100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)40%
(35/88)50%
(3/6)src.filewidgets79%
(30/38)79%
(30/38)58%
(5132/8842)46%
(2352/5129)src.gui100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)82%
(699/856)63%
(347/554)src.gui.systemd50%
(2/4)50%
(2/4)4%
(7/173)1%
(1/104)src.ioslaves.file100%
(7/7)100%
(7/7)55%
(759/1375)40%
(452/1134)src.ioslaves.file.kauth0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/179)0%
(0/89)src.ioslaves.ftp100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)47%
(647/1363)37%
(531/1420)src.ioslaves.help0%
(0/5)0%
(0/5)0%
(0/248)0%
(0/148)src.ioslaves.http88%
(7/8)88%
(7/8)42%
(1783/4257)36%
(1318/3642)src.ioslaves.http.kcookiejar40%
(2/5)40%
(2/5)47%
(627/1325)56%
(576/1035)src.ioslaves.remote100%
(2/2)100%

KDE CI: Frameworks » kdav » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 57 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kdav/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/57/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 11:16:48 +
 Build duration:
3 min 8 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 5 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kdav_davcollectionsmultifetchjobtest

Re: Any interest in a batch file renamer in KIO?

[Nomen Luni]

Hi,

I actually looked at KRename some time back and it wasn't quite what I
wanted. It does actually appear as a service menu option when installed,
so it has that base covered, however for my needs it's felt a little
unwieldy. My application, whilst no doubt a little less capable feels
smaller and more streamlined to operate and dare I say more at a level
consistent with the Dolphin ethos in terms of the simplicity of the GUI
- I realise this is subjective. If anyone has used the Thunar 'bulk
rename' plugin, mine is heavily influenced by the interface of that (but
implemented in Qt which was one of the prime reasons for its
creation)... so it wasn't a case of 'new code is more fun,' so much as
'this is exactly what I want.'

Since KRename already operates as a Dolphin plugin it shouldn't be too
much work to integrate it directly into Dolphin, or perhaps even just
ship it as a default plugin, however that isn't something I'm interested
in working on as I don't use it... benevolent self interest and all that.

Dolphin could really benefit from a batch rename function in my opinion,
what form that functionality should take, pre-existing or new, is a
worthwhile conversation. In any case, Harald's point regarding
discoverability is a valid one, as I'm sure a large proportion of users
never take the time to investigate the service menu plugins.

Lee


On 17/05/2021 10:53, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:

On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 11:44 +0200, Harald Sitter wrote:

Yo

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Nomen Luni  wrote:

Hi Folks,

First time poster. I've recently developed a batch file renaming utility
which operates as a service menu plugin within Dolphin. If anyone has
seen the 'bulk rename' plugin for Thunar, this is highly inspired by
that app in terms of functionality but is a from-scratch implementation
using the Qt stack.

I'm writing to gauge if there's any interest for inclusion in Plasma and
speaking with Nate Graham he said KIO might be the place for it to live
and directed me here.

So basically, is there any interest and if so, could someone give me
some guidance on how to integrate/get it reviewed and added?

The code is on Github. Currently it's compiling through Qt Creator:

https://github.com/Nomen-Luni/Bionic-Batch-Renamer


Neat!
Have you considered contributing to https://apps.kde.org/krename/

I know new code is more fun but krename is already incredibly powerful :)

 From what I read, the main difference is OP developed a Dolphin plugin, whereas
KRename is a separate app. If this plugin will get included in Plasma, then it
will be immediately available in default Plasma installation. Whereas KRename is
a special utility for specific usecase, which I don't think is a part of of
default installation.

I think a plugin discoverbility for a popular app might be a little bit higher
than that of special application, which one wouldn't know about unless they
specifically search for it.


HS

KDE CI: Frameworks » kpty » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 58 - Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kpty/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/58/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 09:59:24 +
 Build duration:
28 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 0 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kptyprocesstest

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 792 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/792/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 09:52:49 +
 Build duration:
32 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 2 test(s), Passed: 54 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 56 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.applicationlauncherjob_forkingtestFailed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

Re: Any interest in a batch file renamer in KIO?

[Konstantin Kharlamov]

On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 11:44 +0200, Harald Sitter wrote:
> Yo
> 
> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Nomen Luni  wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Folks,
> > 
> > First time poster. I've recently developed a batch file renaming utility
> > which operates as a service menu plugin within Dolphin. If anyone has
> > seen the 'bulk rename' plugin for Thunar, this is highly inspired by
> > that app in terms of functionality but is a from-scratch implementation
> > using the Qt stack.
> > 
> > I'm writing to gauge if there's any interest for inclusion in Plasma and
> > speaking with Nate Graham he said KIO might be the place for it to live
> > and directed me here.
> > 
> > So basically, is there any interest and if so, could someone give me
> > some guidance on how to integrate/get it reviewed and added?
> > 
> > The code is on Github. Currently it's compiling through Qt Creator:
> > 
> > https://github.com/Nomen-Luni/Bionic-Batch-Renamer
> > 
> 
> Neat!
> Have you considered contributing to https://apps.kde.org/krename/
> 
> I know new code is more fun but krename is already incredibly powerful :)

>From what I read, the main difference is OP developed a Dolphin plugin, whereas
KRename is a separate app. If this plugin will get included in Plasma, then it
will be immediately available in default Plasma installation. Whereas KRename is
a special utility for specific usecase, which I don't think is a part of of
default installation.

I think a plugin discoverbility for a popular app might be a little bit higher
than that of special application, which one wouldn't know about unless they
specifically search for it.

> HS

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 791 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/791/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 09:04:38 +
 Build duration:
48 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot Failed: 2 test(s), Passed: 54 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 56 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestFailed: projectroot.autotests.kiogui_openurljobtestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

Re: Any interest in a batch file renamer in KIO?

[Harald Sitter]

Yo

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Nomen Luni  wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> First time poster. I've recently developed a batch file renaming utility
> which operates as a service menu plugin within Dolphin. If anyone has
> seen the 'bulk rename' plugin for Thunar, this is highly inspired by
> that app in terms of functionality but is a from-scratch implementation
> using the Qt stack.
>
> I'm writing to gauge if there's any interest for inclusion in Plasma and
> speaking with Nate Graham he said KIO might be the place for it to live
> and directed me here.
>
> So basically, is there any interest and if so, could someone give me
> some guidance on how to integrate/get it reviewed and added?
>
> The code is on Github. Currently it's compiling through Qt Creator:
>
> https://github.com/Nomen-Luni/Bionic-Batch-Renamer
> 

Neat!
Have you considered contributing to https://apps.kde.org/krename/

I know new code is more fun but krename is already incredibly powerful :)

HS

KDE CI: Frameworks » kwayland » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 85 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kwayland/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/85/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 09:03:58 +
 Build duration:
32 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: projectroot.autotests Failed: 12 test(s), Passed: 31 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 43 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testCompositorFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testDataDeviceFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testDataSourceFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testRegionFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testShmPoolFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testSubCompositorFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testSubSurfaceFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testWaylandConnectionThreadFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testWaylandRegistryFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testWaylandShellFailed: projectroot.autotests.client.kwayland_testWaylandSurfaceFailed: projectroot.autotests.server.kwayland_testWaylandServerDisplay

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 791 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/791/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 09:16:58 +
 Build duration:
5 min 22 sec and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5KIO-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 56 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 57 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report68%
(25/37)69%
(290/423)69%
(290/423)57%
(37156/64871)41%
(19345/46868)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests95%
(59/62)95%
(59/62)91%
(10599/11636)45%
(5433/12162)autotests.http100%
(5/5)100%
(5/5)99%
(503/504)65%
(88/136)autotests.kcookiejar100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)93%
(165/177)70%
(49/70)src100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)89%
(8/9)71%
(10/14)src.core88%
(107/121)88%
(107/121)61%
(9018/14684)52%
(4557/8683)src.core.kssl100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)40%
(35/88)50%
(3/6)src.filewidgets79%
(30/38)79%
(30/38)58%
(5132/8841)46%
(2356/5129)src.gui100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)82%
(699/856)63%
(347/554)src.gui.systemd50%
(2/4)50%
(2/4)4%
(7/173)1%
(1/104)src.ioslaves.file100%
(7/7)100%
(7/7)55%
(759/1375)40%
(452/1134)src.ioslaves.file.kauth0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/179)0%
(0/89)src.ioslaves.ftp100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)47%
(647/1363)37%
(531/1420)src.ioslaves.help0%
(0/5)0%
(0/5)0%
(0/248)0%
(0/148)src.ioslaves.http88%
(7/8)88%
(7/8)42%
(1783/4257)36%
(1318/3642)src.ioslaves.http.kcookiejar40%
(2/5)40%
(2/5)47%
(627/1325)56%
(576/1035)src.ioslaves.remote100%
(2/2)100%

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 790 - Still Unstable!

[CI System]

BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/790/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Mon, 17 May 2021 09:04:38 +
 Build duration:
12 min and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  acc/KF5KIO-5.83.0.xml
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 56 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 57 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiofilewidgets_knewfilemenutestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report68%
(25/37)69%
(290/423)69%
(290/423)57%
(37154/64871)41%
(19341/46868)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests95%
(59/62)95%
(59/62)91%
(10599/11636)45%
(5435/12162)autotests.http100%
(5/5)100%
(5/5)99%
(503/504)65%
(88/136)autotests.kcookiejar100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)93%
(165/177)70%
(49/70)src100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)89%
(8/9)71%
(10/14)src.core88%
(107/121)88%
(107/121)61%
(9017/14684)52%
(4552/8683)src.core.kssl100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)40%
(35/88)50%
(3/6)src.filewidgets79%
(30/38)79%
(30/38)58%
(5132/8841)46%
(2356/5129)src.gui100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)82%
(699/856)63%
(347/554)src.gui.systemd50%
(2/4)50%
(2/4)4%
(7/173)1%
(1/104)src.ioslaves.file100%
(7/7)100%
(7/7)55%
(759/1375)40%
(452/1134)src.ioslaves.file.kauth0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/179)0%
(0/89)src.ioslaves.ftp100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)47%
(647/1363)37%
(531/1420)src.ioslaves.help0%
(0/5)0%
(0/5)0%
(0/248)0%
(0/148)src.ioslaves.http88%
(7/8)88%
(7/8)42%
(1782/4257)36%
(1317/3642)src.ioslaves.http.kcookiejar40%
(2/5)40%
(2/5)47%
(627/1325)56%
(576/1035)src.ioslaves.remote100%
(2/2)100%

Idea Submission: Does anyone please have con-args?

[Dominik Kummer]

Hi folks!

I recently submited an ideas on 
https://community.kde.org/SoK/Ideas/2021#eurOS%3A_Standard_European_Operating_System
 
based on personal conclusions studying several citizen 
contributions/discussions on futureu.europa.eu.

Do you see any realistic perspectives on this?
Does it even make sense, or would you consider it to centralized tailored?
Are there already projects aiming towards similar objectives? Or have there 
been in the past?
Whats you opinion on SSI in general?

Thank you so much for any further contra arguments and/or redirections!!

Kind regards, Yours

Dominik