KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 1591 - Still Unstable!
BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/1591/ Project: kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 Date of build: Sun, 29 May 2022 01:43:09 + Build duration: 22 min and counting BUILD ARTIFACTS acc/KF5KIO-5.95.0.xml JUnit Tests Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 61 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 62 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kiowidgets_dropjobtestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 0 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Failed: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash.tests.testtrashName: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s) Cobertura Report Project Coverage Summary Name PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report59% (24/41)69% (298/433)69% (298/433)56% (38470/68520)41% (21348/52400)Coverage Breakdown by Package Name FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests95% (62/65)95% (62/65)91% (11396/12577)45% (7197/15860)autotests.http100% (5/5)100% (5/5)99% (527/528)58% (167/290)autotests.kcookiejar100% (1/1)100% (1/1)94% (173/185)63% (70/112)src100% (1/1)100% (1/1)89% (8/9)71% (10/14)src.core89% (109/123)89% (109/123)61% (9517/15584)52% (4767/9151)src.core.kssl100% (1/1)100% (1/1)38% (33/86)50% (2/4)src.filewidgets79% (31/39)79% (31/39)57% (5437/9471)44% (2321/5330)src.gui100% (12/12)100% (12/12)73% (945/1302)58% (492/844)src.gui.systemd50% (2/4)50% (2/4)4% (7/178)1% (1/108)src.ioslaves.file71% (5/7)71% (5/7)49% (690/1394)39% (476/1225)src.ioslaves.file.kauth0% (0/2)0% (0/2)0% (0/187)0% (0/83)src.ioslaves.ftp100% (2/2)100% (2/2)40% (549/1378)30% (435/1430)src.ioslaves.help0% (0/5)0% (0/5)0% (0/253)0% (0/138)src.ioslaves.http88% (7/8)88% (7/8)44% (1897/4354)37% (1378/3719)src.ioslaves.http.kcookiejar40% (2/5)40% (2/5)49% (664/1364)56% (588/1053)src.ioslaves.remote100% (2/2)100%
KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 1605 - Still Unstable!
BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/1605/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Sun, 29 May 2022 01:43:09 + Build duration: 18 min and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 58 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 61 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.applicationlauncherjob_forkingtestFailed: projectroot.autotests.kiogui_openurljobtestFailed: projectroot.autotests.kiowidgets_dropjobtestName: projectroot.autotests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Name: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 0 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Failed: projectroot.src.ioslaves.trash.tests.testtrashName: projectroot.src.kpasswdserver Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
Re: NetworkManagerQt
On Friday, 27 May 2022 21:44:10 PDT Matthias Klumpp wrote: > In addition to the additions, I also would like to point out that > NetworkManager itself is GPLv2-licensed (note the missing "L"!), so > you will already have to comply with the GPL in your product. Considering it's a Linux device, that was already the case. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering
Re : Re: Kirigami Addons in KDEReview
Le samedi 28 mai 2022 à 4:56 PM, Sandro Knauß a écrit : > Hey, Hi, Sorry about dropping the ball on this KDE review request. I was more interested at that time mostly the treeview luging and not so much about the time and date module and my interest in fixing the issues there was not great. Like you said the time picker improved a bit since the issue was brought up, so let's move this project back to KDE Review and wait 2 weeks. It would help us in Kalendar, since we are currently vendoring the tree view plugin and have a duplication of the date picker. Additionally to the two MRs pointed out, there were also a few more improvements: - The TreeView is not working with RTL layouts and has better keyboard navigation - The project is now fully 'reuse' compliant Cheers, Carl > any news for kirigami-addons getting out of review? I strongly vote for > getting it out of review or at least release a new 0.3. > > So far I can tell master has a lot improved Date picker, that at least for my > usage ( laptop with mouse) I could now use ktrip to select a date and time > yeah. > > It is a bit of a pitty, that there is software based on kirigami-addons > release ( ktrip and initarary). That currently has no useful time/date picker, > when you don't build from master branch. I tested that on my librem 5 with > postmasker OS, as they ship kirigami-addons v0.2 and I wanted to use ktrip and > had no possibility to change the time... > > > I would like to see > > https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kirigami-addons/-/issues/2 fixed first > > as the date picker is sort of almost unusable right now. > > > I can understand, that releasing a not really useful timepicker is not nice - > but than at least to regular unstable releases. And there is a lot of > improvments since 0.2. Some highlights: > > https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kirigami-addons/-/merge_requests/20 > https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kirigami-addons/-/merge_requests/27 > > regards, > > hefee > > -- > Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel / My public key: E68031D299A6527C > Fingerabdruck / Fingerprint: > D256 4951 1272 8840 BB5E 99F2 E680 31D2 99A6 527C > runterladen/download: > https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/ > D256495112728840BB5E99F2E68031D299A6527C
Re: Kirigami Addons in KDEReview
Hey, any news for kirigami-addons getting out of review? I strongly vote for getting it out of review or at least release a new 0.3. So far I can tell master has a lot improved Date picker, that at least for my usage ( laptop with mouse) I could now use ktrip to select a date and time *yeah*. It is a bit of a pitty, that there is software based on kirigami-addons release ( ktrip and initarary). That currently has no useful time/date picker, when you don't build from master branch. I tested that on my librem 5 with postmasker OS, as they ship kirigami-addons v0.2 and I wanted to use ktrip and had no possibility to change the time... > I would like to see > https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kirigami-addons/-/issues/2 fixed first > as the date picker is sort of almost unusable right now. I can understand, that releasing a not really useful timepicker is not nice - but than at least to regular unstable releases. And there is a lot of improvments since 0.2. Some highlights: https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kirigami-addons/-/merge_requests/20 https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kirigami-addons/-/merge_requests/27 regards, hefee -- Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel / My public key: E68031D299A6527C Fingerabdruck / Fingerprint: D256 4951 1272 8840 BB5E 99F2 E680 31D2 99A6 527C runterladen/download: https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/ D256495112728840BB5E99F2E68031D299A6527C signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
KDE CI: Frameworks » kservice » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 247 - Unstable!
BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kservice/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/247/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Sat, 28 May 2022 13:19:14 + Build duration: 17 min and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 10 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 11 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.ksycocathreadtestName: projectroot.tests Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
KDE CI: Frameworks » kpty » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 112 - Fixed!
BUILD SUCCESS Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kpty/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/112/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Sat, 28 May 2022 12:00:43 + Build duration: 1 hr 21 min and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectroot Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
