On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:42:26PM +0200, David Faure wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2012 22:02:03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > yes. a rather suboptimal replacement. before you ask, search the core-devel > > archive shortly before the time the new kprocess was added. > > I can't do *everything* in the KDE Frameworks 5 effort. > no. but then, you don't have to kill everything which is small but still wasn't upstreamed, either. at the very least, you can keep it as an internal class.
> Both QProcess and KProcess are mostly your code, aren't they? > kprocess is mine. i made only few contributions to qprocess. > How about you fix QProcess then, if you consider it suboptimal? > priorities. ;) (which is ironic, as i joined trolltech because i wanted to work on qprocess :}). _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel