Re: RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th
Hi, Le 06/12/2020 à 18:05, David Faure a écrit : On dimanche 6 décembre 2020 17:39:38 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: * MidnightBSD * openBSD The BSDs are a bit more unfortunate. Thanks for the information, Albert. Apparently this means bumping the requirement to Qt 5.14 would break OpenBSD. How can we reach OpenBSD KDE people? CC'ing kde-free...@kde.org, I know it's not the same, but maybe you guys know? ;) For OpenBSD It's (mainly) Rafael Sadowski aka sizeofvoid: sadowski at openbsd.org Regards. Loïc
Re: RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th
On Sunday, 6 December 2020 18:05:19 CET David Faure wrote: > On dimanche 6 décembre 2020 17:39:38 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > * MidnightBSD > > * openBSD > > > > The BSDs are a bit more unfortunate. > > Thanks for the information, Albert. > > Apparently this means bumping the requirement to Qt 5.14 would break > OpenBSD. > > How can we reach OpenBSD KDE people? > CC'ing kde-free...@kde.org, I know it's not the same, but maybe you guys > know? ;) Rafael Sadowski , ping them on invent or on phab (or in the CC of this message :) ). [ade] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:05 AM David Faure wrote: > On dimanche 6 décembre 2020 17:39:38 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > * MidnightBSD > > * openBSD > > The BSDs are a bit more unfortunate. > > Thanks for the information, Albert. > > Apparently this means bumping the requirement to Qt 5.14 would break > OpenBSD. > > How can we reach OpenBSD KDE people? > CC'ing kde-free...@kde.org, I know it's not the same, but maybe you guys > know? > ;) > The "distribution point of contacts" list that Sysadmin maintains says openbsd-...@googlegroups.com is the appropriate mailing list for KDE on OpenBSD. Cheers, Ben > -- > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > Working on KDE Frameworks 5 > > > >
KDE CI: Frameworks » kdav » kf5-qt5 WindowsMSVCQt5.15 - Build # 11 - Still unstable!
BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kdav/job/kf5-qt5%20WindowsMSVCQt5.15/11/ Project: kf5-qt5 WindowsMSVCQt5.15 Date of build: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:29:09 + Build duration: 2 min 14 sec and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectroot Failed: 2 test(s), Passed: 4 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.kdav_davcollectionsmultifetchjobtestFailed: projectroot.autotests.kdav_davitemfetchjob
Re: RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th
On dimanche 6 décembre 2020 17:39:38 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > * MidnightBSD > * openBSD > The BSDs are a bit more unfortunate. Thanks for the information, Albert. Apparently this means bumping the requirement to Qt 5.14 would break OpenBSD. How can we reach OpenBSD KDE people? CC'ing kde-free...@kde.org, I know it's not the same, but maybe you guys know? ;) -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5
Re: RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th
El diumenge, 6 de desembre de 2020, a les 14:20:47 CET, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau va escriure: > Hi, > > you might have seen I asked* whether anyone knows a real world requirement to > stick with Qt 5.13 as new current minimum required Qt version for current KF > releases. So far no-one had to report a reason to support Qt >= 5.13 instead > of only Qt >= 5.14 now. > * E.g. https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/distributions/2020-December/000894.html > > So hereby I propose to switch for KF 5.78 to Qt 5.14 as minimum version, and > change the KF dependencies policy text* to this: > * https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies#Frameworks_Qt_requirements > > " > With Qt6 this changes a little bit again. We interpolate "as if" more Qt 5 > versions would be released. Then adapt to actual real world usage of a given > Qt version: > * Qt 5.13 will be the minimum required version 6 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. > on > 26 Nov 2020 > * Qt 5.14 would be the minimum required version 12 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. > on 26 May 2021. With no-one known to stick with Qt 5.13, the date is moved to > earlier mid-December 2020. > * Qt 5.15 LTS will be the minimum required version 18 months after its > release, i.e. on 26 Nov 2021 > " > > from previous > > " > With Qt6 this changes a little bit again. We interpolate "as if" more Qt 5 > versions would be released: > * Qt 5.13 will be the minimum required version 6 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. > on > 26 Nov 2020 > * Qt 5.14 will be the minimum required version 12 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. > on 26 May 2021 > * Qt 5.15 LTS will be the minimum required version 18 months after its > release, i.e. on 26 Nov 2021 > " > > I also propose that if no objections pop up until Monday, December 14th, CET > Noon, we then go that day and update the policy and have our dependency > bumping service people execute the bump to Qt 5.14. > > Your comments, please :) Personally what interests me more as a minimum Qt version is not what distributions will be shipping it, but what they have already shipped so existing people can become developers without having to compile all of Qt. Looking at https://repology.org/project/qt/badges The distros with Qt 5.13 are: * Chakra * Fedora 31 * MidnightBSD * openBSD * OpenMandriva 4.0 Both Fedora 31 and OpenMandriva 4.0 have releases with newer Qt so I guess those wanting to develop have a relatively easy path forward. Chakra seems on the "almost dead" area (Qt 5.13 for what's supposedly a rolling distribution is not a good sign) so i'm going to guess it doesn't have many users still. The BSDs are a bit more unfortunate. Not a -1 nor a -1 from my side, just wanting to provide a different perspective that's looking to the past of distributions and not to the future. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers > Friedrich > > >
D22093: Don't show progress window for jobs that don't report progress
nicolasfella abandoned this revision. REPOSITORY R495 Purpose Library REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D22093 To: nicolasfella, apol, ngraham Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
D23835: Add TabKCM
nicolasfella abandoned this revision. REPOSITORY R296 KDeclarative REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D23835 To: nicolasfella, mart Cc: broulik, onvitaik, zzag, ngraham, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, bruns
RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th
Hi, you might have seen I asked* whether anyone knows a real world requirement to stick with Qt 5.13 as new current minimum required Qt version for current KF releases. So far no-one had to report a reason to support Qt >= 5.13 instead of only Qt >= 5.14 now. * E.g. https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/distributions/2020-December/000894.html So hereby I propose to switch for KF 5.78 to Qt 5.14 as minimum version, and change the KF dependencies policy text* to this: * https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies#Frameworks_Qt_requirements " With Qt6 this changes a little bit again. We interpolate "as if" more Qt 5 versions would be released. Then adapt to actual real world usage of a given Qt version: * Qt 5.13 will be the minimum required version 6 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. on 26 Nov 2020 * Qt 5.14 would be the minimum required version 12 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. on 26 May 2021. With no-one known to stick with Qt 5.13, the date is moved to earlier mid-December 2020. * Qt 5.15 LTS will be the minimum required version 18 months after its release, i.e. on 26 Nov 2021 " from previous " With Qt6 this changes a little bit again. We interpolate "as if" more Qt 5 versions would be released: * Qt 5.13 will be the minimum required version 6 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. on 26 Nov 2020 * Qt 5.14 will be the minimum required version 12 months after Qt 5.15, i.e. on 26 May 2021 * Qt 5.15 LTS will be the minimum required version 18 months after its release, i.e. on 26 Nov 2021 " I also propose that if no objections pop up until Monday, December 14th, CET Noon, we then go that day and update the policy and have our dependency bumping service people execute the bump to Qt 5.14. Your comments, please :) Cheers Friedrich
