Re: Review Request 122007: Fix KTcpSocket to return correct negotiated protocol
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122007/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2015, 12:43 p.m.) Status -- This change has been marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Thiago Macieira. Repository: kio Description --- This pull request fixes a long standing issue in KTcpSocket where member functions negotiatedSslVersion and negotiatedSslVersionName returned the requested protocol instead of the actual negotiated one because QSslSocket did provide a means of accessing the actual negotiated protocol. Since this has been addressed in Qt 5.4, the problem should be fixed in KTcpSocket as well. Additionally the patch also adds support for Tlsv1_1 and TlsV1_2 protocols. Diffs - src/core/ktcpsocket.h d59b180 src/core/ktcpsocket.cpp f223986 src/core/tcpslavebase.cpp e62e72a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122007/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Dawit Alemayehu ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 122007: Fix KTcpSocket to return correct negotiated protocol
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122007/ --- (Updated Jan. 16, 2015, 6:14 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Thiago Macieira. Changes --- Updated patch Repository: kio Description --- This pull request fixes a long standing issue in KTcpSocket where member functions negotiatedSslVersion and negotiatedSslVersionName returned the requested protocol instead of the actual negotiated one because QSslSocket did provide a means of accessing the actual negotiated protocol. Since this has been addressed in Qt 5.4, the problem should be fixed in KTcpSocket as well. Additionally the patch also adds support for Tlsv1_1 and TlsV1_2 protocols. Diffs (updated) - src/core/ktcpsocket.h d59b180 src/core/ktcpsocket.cpp f223986 src/core/tcpslavebase.cpp e62e72a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122007/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Dawit Alemayehu ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 122007: Fix KTcpSocket to return correct negotiated protocol
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122007/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Thiago Macieira. Repository: kio Description --- This pull request fixes a long standing issue in KTcpSocket where member functions negotiatedSslVersion and negotiatedSslVersionName returned the requested protocol instead of the actual negotiated one because QSslSocket did provide a means of accessing the actual negotiated protocol. Since this has been addressed in Qt 5.4, the problem should be fixed in KTcpSocket as well. Additionally the patch also adds support for Tlsv1_1 and TlsV1_2 protocols. Diffs - src/core/ktcpsocket.h d59b180 src/core/ktcpsocket.cpp f223986 src/core/tcpslavebase.cpp e62e72a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122007/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Dawit Alemayehu ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115723: Use Q_OS_UNIX instead of HAVE_X11 to determine the platform we are on
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115723/#review49709 --- Ship it! That seems like a reasonable compromise to me. I wonder what Mozilla/Chromium send when the windowing system is something other than X11. Probably the same thing. - Dawit Alemayehu On Feb. 13, 2014, 1:03 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115723/ --- (Updated Feb. 13, 2014, 1:03 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Dawit Alemayehu and Bernhard Beschow. Repository: kio Description --- Use Q_OS_UNIX instead of HAVE_X11 to determine the platform we are on We cannot properly determine the windowing system platform on unix like systems in kprotocolmanager as it's not linking gui. Thus we don't know whether we are on X11 or Wayland and there is no proper way to figure it out, because both DISPLAY and WAYLAND_DISPLAY could be defined. As a solution we just force the platform to be always X11 when we are on unix like systems (modulo mac). Diffs - src/core/kprotocolmanager.cpp f81b6797887eebd868c36b98e867eb055b05a1e2 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115723/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115613: Drop platform name from default user agent string
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/#review49479 --- Well the platform name was added for compatibility with what Firefox at the time. And Chromium seems to have adapted that as well. The latest stable version of Firefox (version 27) for example sends the following user agent string by default: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 And the latest Chromium (version 32) sends the following: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.107 Safari/537.36 So removing the platform name from the user-agent string might have consequences on sites that rely on it. - Dawit Alemayehu On Feb. 10, 2014, 9:15 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 9:15 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Dawit Alemayehu and Bernhard Beschow. Repository: kio Description --- Drop platform name from default user agent string The platform name (e.g. X11) was currently broken on compile time. On Linux it returned unknown and on all other platforms the same name as already included in the OS name. We cannot really determine the platform name as this is a core application and the Qt's platform name is only available in a GUI application. Compile time is no solution as we cannot know whether the binary is executed on X11, Wayland, Android or whatever. Diffs - src/core/kprotocolmanager.cpp f81b6797887eebd868c36b98e867eb055b05a1e2 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 112463: Port SMB kioslave to KF5/Qt5
On Nov. 26, 2013, 5:12 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: It's been stalled for almost three months now, any chance to see progress or should it be discarded? Mark Gaiser wrote: No, it should most certainly not be disgarded. It was even working when i posted this post up for review. Dawit, how are you doing in the SMB improvements that you had in mind? Sorry, I forgot to inform you. I have already merged my changes into 4.12 and master branches. - Dawit --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/#review44515 --- On Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/ --- (Updated Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kde-runtime Description --- This is the initial port! I added two TODO lines in the diff for parts where i'm not sure if I've ported them correctly. Also, i needed a change in FindSamba.cmake to even get the samba detection working. That reviewrequest is waiting here: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112448/ you're probably OK if you still use samba 3.x Once i know that this is actually working then i will comment some qDebug lines. Diffs - kioslave/CMakeLists.txt ff66ab6 kioslave/smb/CMakeLists.txt a3a2265 kioslave/smb/kio_smb.h 55efb44 kioslave/smb/kio_smb.cpp 2c2523a kioslave/smb/kio_smb_auth.cpp 4d236b4 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_browse.cpp fec6449 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_config.cpp 81ce29c kioslave/smb/kio_smb_dir.cpp 5573266 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_file.cpp 827a519 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_internal.h b895b81 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_internal.cpp 3c35583 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_mount.cpp a5a7e8e Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/diff/ Testing --- It compiles and gets loaded just fine. I tried testing this on an actual samba share, but i kept getting a 111 error (connection refused) from kio_smb so i'm hoping that is a local issue here. If someone else could try this out and verify that it's either working or broken. Thanks, Mark Gaiser ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 112463: Port SMB kioslave to KF5/Qt5
On Sept. 6, 2013, 1:10 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote: I have several changes coming to this ioslave. Mainly I am going to implement the copyFrom and copyTo optimizations like I did for the sftp ioslave and add support for upload/download resumptions. The changes are going to come in parts because they are not small and should be done in the next week or two. If you feel that it would be easier to merge those changes after your port, then feel free to ship this, otherwise would it be possible for you to hold off on this port? For the record I am not the maintainer of this code base. I am just trying to improve as many of these ioslaves as I can when I get the chance. Mark Gaiser wrote: Question though: did you test this port and did it work for you? As for the porting and your changes. You seem to be making those changes in KDE/4.11, not in frameworks-scratch, so i would prefer if you make the changes you want to make. Once those are in i will have to rebase my changes against it and request a ship it again :) I cannot test it because I am not setup for KF5. I just went through the code. - Dawit --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/#review39463 --- On Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/ --- (Updated Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and KDE Frameworks. Description --- This is the initial port! I added two TODO lines in the diff for parts where i'm not sure if I've ported them correctly. Also, i needed a change in FindSamba.cmake to even get the samba detection working. That reviewrequest is waiting here: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112448/ you're probably OK if you still use samba 3.x Once i know that this is actually working then i will comment some qDebug lines. Diffs - kioslave/CMakeLists.txt ff66ab6 kioslave/smb/CMakeLists.txt a3a2265 kioslave/smb/kio_smb.h 55efb44 kioslave/smb/kio_smb.cpp 2c2523a kioslave/smb/kio_smb_auth.cpp 4d236b4 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_browse.cpp fec6449 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_config.cpp 81ce29c kioslave/smb/kio_smb_dir.cpp 5573266 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_file.cpp 827a519 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_internal.h b895b81 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_internal.cpp 3c35583 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_mount.cpp a5a7e8e Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/diff/ Testing --- It compiles and gets loaded just fine. I tried testing this on an actual samba share, but i kept getting a 111 error (connection refused) from kio_smb so i'm hoping that is a local issue here. If someone else could try this out and verify that it's either working or broken. Thanks, Mark Gaiser ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 112463: Port SMB kioslave to KF5/Qt5
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/#review39463 --- I have several changes coming to this ioslave. Mainly I am going to implement the copyFrom and copyTo optimizations like I did for the sftp ioslave and add support for upload/download resumptions. The changes are going to come in parts because they are not small and should be done in the next week or two. If you feel that it would be easier to merge those changes after your port, then feel free to ship this, otherwise would it be possible for you to hold off on this port? For the record I am not the maintainer of this code base. I am just trying to improve as many of these ioslaves as I can when I get the chance. - Dawit Alemayehu On Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/ --- (Updated Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and KDE Frameworks. Description --- This is the initial port! I added two TODO lines in the diff for parts where i'm not sure if I've ported them correctly. Also, i needed a change in FindSamba.cmake to even get the samba detection working. That reviewrequest is waiting here: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112448/ you're probably OK if you still use samba 3.x Once i know that this is actually working then i will comment some qDebug lines. Diffs - kioslave/CMakeLists.txt ff66ab6 kioslave/smb/CMakeLists.txt a3a2265 kioslave/smb/kio_smb.h 55efb44 kioslave/smb/kio_smb.cpp 2c2523a kioslave/smb/kio_smb_auth.cpp 4d236b4 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_browse.cpp fec6449 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_config.cpp 81ce29c kioslave/smb/kio_smb_dir.cpp 5573266 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_file.cpp 827a519 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_internal.h b895b81 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_internal.cpp 3c35583 kioslave/smb/kio_smb_mount.cpp a5a7e8e Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/diff/ Testing --- It compiles and gets loaded just fine. I tried testing this on an actual samba share, but i kept getting a 111 error (connection refused) from kio_smb so i'm hoping that is a local issue here. If someone else could try this out and verify that it's either working or broken. Thanks, Mark Gaiser ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
