Re: Monitoring autotest coverage in frameworks
Hi, 2012/3/1 Frank Reininghaus frank7...@googlemail.com: Hi, Am 1. März 2012 00:44 schrieb Dario Freddi: I was wondering if we already had a way to generate reports on autotests coverage using lcov/gcov in frameworks. Looking at our cmake infrastructure, I spotted a build mode Profile which should apparently set the correct compiler flags (but actually, at least for me, it didn't work), I didn't go as far as seeing if it also forces every library to build static. Instead, there seems to be no mention of a lcov target. Question time: is anybody already working on this? I think it's quite important for us to have such a thing, and I'd be happy to provide patches for this to happen (would be cool if Alex or any other buildsystem gatekeeper gave a word about how this should be done/where should it go). it seems that measuring test coverage does work in kdelibs 4.x, at least there are results submitted daily to CDash: http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=kdelibsdate=2012-03-01 AFAIK, the results which CTest gathers during the tests using gcov are written to an XML file (which is then submitted to CDash if you ran the tests using, e.g., 'make Experimental'). This is *awesome* news indeed, I didn't know CDash did that. Do you also know if CDash is capable of generating a report which takes into account coverage of directories as well a-la-lcov? Something like solid/ 23% solid/test.cpp 34% etc... If we had that, problem solved 100%. With the current interface is just a little confusing to find out the global coverage of a specific project/subdirectory (this could be quite important for frameworks) Best regards, Frank ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Monitoring autotest coverage in frameworks
Hi, Am 1. März 2012 00:44 schrieb Dario Freddi: I was wondering if we already had a way to generate reports on autotests coverage using lcov/gcov in frameworks. Looking at our cmake infrastructure, I spotted a build mode Profile which should apparently set the correct compiler flags (but actually, at least for me, it didn't work), I didn't go as far as seeing if it also forces every library to build static. Instead, there seems to be no mention of a lcov target. Question time: is anybody already working on this? I think it's quite important for us to have such a thing, and I'd be happy to provide patches for this to happen (would be cool if Alex or any other buildsystem gatekeeper gave a word about how this should be done/where should it go). it seems that measuring test coverage does work in kdelibs 4.x, at least there are results submitted daily to CDash: http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=kdelibsdate=2012-03-01 AFAIK, the results which CTest gathers during the tests using gcov are written to an XML file (which is then submitted to CDash if you ran the tests using, e.g., 'make Experimental'). Best regards, Frank ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Monitoring autotest coverage in frameworks
Hey guys, I was wondering if we already had a way to generate reports on autotests coverage using lcov/gcov in frameworks. Looking at our cmake infrastructure, I spotted a build mode Profile which should apparently set the correct compiler flags (but actually, at least for me, it didn't work), I didn't go as far as seeing if it also forces every library to build static. Instead, there seems to be no mention of a lcov target. Question time: is anybody already working on this? I think it's quite important for us to have such a thing, and I'd be happy to provide patches for this to happen (would be cool if Alex or any other buildsystem gatekeeper gave a word about how this should be done/where should it go). ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Monitoring autotest coverage in frameworks
On Thursday 01 March 2012 00:44:51 Dario Freddi wrote: Question time: is anybody already working on this? Nope. I think it's quite important for us to have such a thing, [...] Agreed, but I think we have more important and pressing issues to solve first. I'd rather have a first KDE Frameworks release before playing too much with adding new features like that. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
