On Wednesday 24 June 2015 23:20:21 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 23 June 2015 19:35:48 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org
wrote:
Hi framework-developers and packagers,
with two frameworks I'm currently in the need to have something like
QPA.
I
want to make it possible to provide windowing-system specific plugins
for
frameworks using a private API. The need arises first of all in
kwindowsystem to support wayland [1]. To implement it we need a
dependency to KWayland, which is currently part of kde-workspace and
not
yet up to the quality and stability levels needed to make it a
framework.
The second framework where I need such functionality is kglobalaccel
where kwin needs to take over a large part of the functionality of the
runtime to make it work on wayland at all.
I see the following possibilities to solve the problem:
1.Make it a private API without any ABI guarantee
2. Make it a public stable API with ABI guarantee
3. Make it a private API with so-version changes whenever the ABI
changes
Option 1 is closest to what Qt's QPA does, but I think this would be a
nightmare for packagers.
Option 2 could result in a nightmare for developers especially in the
plugin infrastructure itself. With releases every month that could
quickly end in classes like KWindowSystemPrivate32 and result in an
unmanageable runtime check system.
Personally I think Option 3 is the cleanest solution. Would this be
acceptable for everyone? If yes are there any suggestions for where to
install headers to, for naming the libraries, etc?
Looking forward for your input,
Cheers
Martin
[1] And obviously also other windowing systems if distributions/OSes
want
to add support for it.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Hi Martin,
We already have something similar with frameworksintegration, maybe it
would make sense to integrate what you need there?
Frameworksintegration doesn't really help as it's still part of frameworks
and thus cannot depend on workspace libraries like kwayland. Also it's
absolutely no solution for the problem of kglobalaccel (that feature
must(!) be provided by kwin, there is no other way).
The biggest problem I see is that you want it in kde-workspace and
it's really complex to use a changing library within 2 different
release cycles. It will make things break on one side or another.
What you can do is a stable plugin API and then provide the Wayland
plugins from Plasma releases. X11 and others can remain within
frameworks.
That's option 2 from above. As said above I fear that this will be
problematic due to the very short release cycle of frameworks and will
create many subclasses just to keep it ABI stable. Of course it's doable,
but well...
Well, these aren't completely new abstractions I guess, they're just
not public interfaces yet. If you start with wayland and X11 backends
(and ideally win/mac too), it should be a solid-enough interface
already so it doesn't need to change on the very next iteration.
This assumes the API is done and is no longer extended. That's not the case,
the API got extended at a constant pace over the last few months. Each
addition to the API will need an addition to the private API in measure of
adding a new virtual method.
Cheers
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
