Re: kauth testing?
Martin Graesslin wrote: > did it build the mac or the fake backend? On OS X, the Mac backend, and the polkit-qt-1 backend on Linux. I'm not 100% sure of the exact error on OS X because the notification popups don't work properly (they just show the title/caption). That's another point; I don't know if those notifications are posted by KAuth or by smb4k. Smb4k looks very much like a work in progress, so I'm inclined to put the blame there rather than with either KAuth or KNotifications but I'm not familiar enough with those frameworks to be affirmative about that. >> Is there a simple test app I could download and use to test this? > > Doesn't look like it, At least I didn't find any in the src repository. That was my impression too. Then how about a "real-life" application that's known to work and not too tightly coupled to Plasma nor too demanding to build in terms of dependencies? A propos that: does the KAuth mechanism actually work in the kwallet kcm provided by kwalletmanager, under a Plasma5 session? I still only see a call to KCModule::authAction() but cannot find a corresponding call to setAuthAction(), nor any use of "org.kde.kcontrol.kcmkwallet5.save" (defined in the kwallet.action file that's registered via kauth_install_actions). Cheers, René ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: kauth testing?
On Sunday, April 3, 2016 9:29:55 AM CEST René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > KAuth doesn't come with anything but a few unittests that do not appear to > attempt an actual authentication. I build my K*5 stuff for installation > into /opt/local, under OS X and under KUbuntu 14.04 (i.e. a KDE4 desktop). > That excludes almost everything related to Plasma5 desktops and I only know > of the kwallet kcm which is supposed to use KAuth to unlock the > configuration settings ... something that as far as I understand the code > was never implemented completely so I had to disable the feature with a > patch in order to be able to use the kcm. > > Now I installed smb4k git/master and see InvalidActionErrors each time I > attempt to authenticate which of course raises the question if my KAuth > build isn't broken. did it build the mac or the fake backend? > > Is there a simple test app I could download and use to test this? Doesn't look like it, At least I didn't find any in the src repository. Cheers Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
kauth testing?
Hi, KAuth doesn't come with anything but a few unittests that do not appear to attempt an actual authentication. I build my K*5 stuff for installation into /opt/local, under OS X and under KUbuntu 14.04 (i.e. a KDE4 desktop). That excludes almost everything related to Plasma5 desktops and I only know of the kwallet kcm which is supposed to use KAuth to unlock the configuration settings ... something that as far as I understand the code was never implemented completely so I had to disable the feature with a patch in order to be able to use the kcm. Now I installed smb4k git/master and see InvalidActionErrors each time I attempt to authenticate which of course raises the question if my KAuth build isn't broken. Is there a simple test app I could download and use to test this? Thanks, René ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
