[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #118 from fcsk@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #117)
Send me an email, i need to ask you some questions. Since i never did any
contibute intro ports tree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #117 from Don Lewis  ---
Created attachment 175960
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=175960=edit
script to find ports that use boost

I used the attached script to find ports that directly use boost.  The
make.conf referenced by the script contains:
 OPTIONS_SET=REGEX OQGRAPH BOOST MOD_BOOLEAN ASIO MNUMPY
 DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
to set some non-default options to detect some ports that don't use boost in
their default configuration.

I seem to recall that building the set of ports that this script detects took
16-18 hours on my 8-core package build machine for one arch + OS version combo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #116 from fcsk@gmail.com ---
Can anyone make a list of ports where it is used boost? I have enough time to
test them all.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #115 from Jason Bacon  ---

FYI, I renamed the 1.60.0 ports at
https://github.com/outpaddling/freebsd-ports-wip to boost*-1.60.0 and have
begun upgrading to 1.62.0.

Also switched from tar:bzip2 to 7z as the distfiles are smaller.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: [package - 101amd64-default][print/kde4-print-manager] Failed for print-manager-4.14.3_1 in build

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 04:34:11 GMT pkg-fall...@freebsd.org wrote:
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/print/kde4-print-manager/work/print-manager-4.14.3/libkcups/KCupsRequest.cpp:284:24:
>  error: use of undeclared identifier 'cupsGetPPD2'
> filename = cupsGetPPD2(CUPS_HTTP_DEFAULT, printerName.toUtf8());
>^

Fixed in ports r424155.

[SVN Commit] branches/plasma5/KDE/x11-themes/plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd

[Adriaan de Groot]

SVN commit 13189 by adridg:

Plasma 5 default wallpaper - swap out the KDE4 wallpaper for the one I wanted. 
Thanks to Timothee.

 M  +3 -3  distinfo  
 M  +1 -9  pkg-plist  

[SVN Commit] branches/plasma5/KDE/x11-themes/plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd

[Adriaan de Groot]

SVN commit 13188 by adridg:

Give the wallpapers thing a better MASTER_SITES, temporarily, so folks can 
actually fetch it.

 M  +1 -1  Makefile  

[SVN Commit] branches/plasma5/KDE/x11-themes

[Adriaan de Groot]

SVN commit 13187 by adridg:

Add a branding-wallpapers-for-plasma5 port. The distfile location is bogus: 
still need to do something about that. Also, needs actual fun wallpaper 
(current distfile is a copy of the stripes-blue one).

 A plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd (directory)  
 A plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd/Makefile  
 A plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd/distinfo  
 A plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd/pkg-descr  
 A plasma5-wallpapers-freebsd/pkg-plist  

[SVN Commit] branches/plasma5/KDE/x11/plasma5-plasma-desktop

[Adriaan de Groot]

SVN commit 13186 by adridg:

Shuffle the USE_KDE for the Plasma 5 Desktop: add the _run targets separately, 
and add infocenter to the list.

 M  +5 -3  Makefile  

[SVN Commit] branches/plasma5/KDE/devel/kio-extras

[Adriaan de Groot]

SVN commit 13185 by adridg:

Add missing maintainer

 M  +1 -0  Makefile  

[Bug 213530] [exp-run] update devel/qt5 to 5.6.2

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213530

--- Comment #4 from Tobias C. Berner  ---
Looking at the pkg build log for irc/quassel [1] the SSL-check seems to have
failed already with 5.6.1 [and probably before]:
[...]
-- Performing Test HAVE_SSL
-- Performing Test HAVE_SSL - Failed
[...]

An easy fix to this is just to pass -DHAVE_SSL via cmake -- arch, gentoo,
fedora, ... also do this.

So this can be fixed separately from the 5.6.2 update, I think.


[1]
http://beefy4.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/quassel/0.12.4/head-amd64-default.log

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 213530] [exp-run] update devel/qt5 to 5.6.2

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213530

--- Comment #3 from gr...@kde.org ---
tcberner@ points out that there are SSL issues in the build -- even if they
don't cause build failures. That will need to be sorted out in a v3 of the
patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.