[kmail2] [Bug 483779] KMail hangs when invoking "Configure KMail..."
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483779 --- Comment #4 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- As this also affects settings for crypto, I've created a sister report at https://dev.gnupg.org/T7081 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 485308] Public keys for encryption will be shown as "bad" in the composer, even if they can be used for encryption
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485308 --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- There is a sister report at https://dev.gnupg.org/T7075 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 483779] KMail hangs when invoking "Configure KMail..."
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483779 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernh...@intevation.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 483779] KMail hangs when invoking "Configure KMail..."
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483779 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Priority|NOR |HI Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |major --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Hello, I can confirm that there is a defect with the configuration of Kmail2 in kontact-24.02.1-kf.236.3.x86_64 (which I have noticed after a move from Qt5 to Qt6 and thus Plasma5 to Plasma6 on GNU/Linux Opensuse Leap + Stable KDE repos.) I notice a long delay in opening the configuration dialog (like 8 seconds) then I often get dialogs about to confirm a change in the configuration (which does not make sense as I did not yet do a change). Additionally changes are not recorded, as I wanted to make the change that is shown here: https://wiki.gnupg.org/EMailClients/KMail and closing the dialogs for good, after I open them again, the change was lost. Once I've got a crash as well. I raise the priority because and email client where configuration cannot be done or is lost is hard to impossible to use. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 485308] Public keys for encryption will be shown as "bad" in the composer, even if they can be used for encryption
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485308 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Okay, listing both packages: kontact-24.02.1-kf.236.3.x86_64 kmail-24.02.1-kf.265.4.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 485308] Public keys for encryption will be shown as "bad" in the composer, even if they can be used for encryption
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485308 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.24.2 |6.0.1 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- the about dialog of Kontact says 6.0.1, while the package is 24.02.1-kf.265.4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 483779] KMail hangs when invoking "Configure KMail..."
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483779 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.0.0 |6.0.1 --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- the about dialog of Kontact says 6.0.1, while the package is 24.02.1-kf.265.4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 485308] New: Public keys for encryption will be shown as "bad" in the composer, even if they can be used for encryption
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485308 Bug ID: 485308 Summary: Public keys for encryption will be shown as "bad" in the composer, even if they can be used for encryption Classification: Applications Product: kmail2 Version: 5.24.2 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: crypto Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 168332 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168332=edit showing the composer and kleopatra displaying the problem Recipients that the user wants to encrypt to are shown as red while the"validity" of a corresponding public key is just "unknown". This is a regression from a previous version and inconsistent with the display of the same public key in Kleopatra. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Make sure to have an email address with a public key in GnuPG that is not fully "valid" for encryption. E.g. by calling `LANG=C gpg --locate-external-keys christoph.klas...@intevation.de` to get the pubkey via WKD, see something like `pub rsa3072/BA842B59E4A30D2F 2021-09-27 [SC] [expires: 2026-07-30] 978EE1FDE4F929229B3207CBBA842B59E4A30D2F uid [ unknown] Christoph Klassen sub rsa3072/11CD70D4D6223146 2021-09-27 [E] [expires: 2026-07-30]` 2. Open the composer, enter the email address. 3. Select "encrypt" 4. (optional) Send the email, and observe a dialog where you can okay the pubkey and encryption, showing that this can be done. 5. (optional) click on the icon to open Kleopatra and see that the pubkey has a validity of unknown. OBSERVED RESULT There is an icon shown left to the address that is a red square with a white cross. If you click on it, you see Kleopatra where there is a purple square with a white question mark. See kontact-24.02.1-pubkey-selection-problem-1.png EXPECTED RESULT As in previous versions the icon should be neutral to indicate that encryption is possible while there is not much trust that the pubkey belongs to the owner of the email address. (Ideally a pubkey fetched via WKD should have enough trust to allow encryption directly, because kmail does not know (yet?) that the pubkey has been fetched via WKD, it must chose an icon that stand for both situations, fully unknown and basic validity.) SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS rpm -qa | grep kontact- kontact-lang-24.02.1-kf.236.3.noarch Operating System: openSUSE Leap 15.5 KDE Plasma Version: 6.0.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 6.0.0 Qt Version: 6.7.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Reminder Daemon] [Bug 481024] The loss of user-defined snoozing for calendar and todo reminders is a massive functional regression and actually a hard show-stopper for my kontact usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024 --- Comment #25 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- > Any idea where this fundamental discussion about the change culture of KDE > should be started? (bug reports is the wrong place, IMHO) True, this problem report and the tracker is suboptimal for the topic. For while it would have been one of the mailinglists, but I am not sure about this anymore. KDE e.V. maybe a place to ask about a good channel. However it is most helpful to understand that there are many volunteers that work on KDE's software products. While the whole process may have its downsides and bad outcomes, any volunteer time and effort is appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Reminder Daemon] [Bug 481024] The loss of user-defined snoozing for calendar and todo reminders is a massive functional regression and actually a hard show-stopper for my kontact usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024 --- Comment #23 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- > You can easily rebuild a patch akonadi-calendar package even right now. It also maybe an option on OpenSuse to use one of the https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:KDE_repositories that is providing newer KDE Application revision to stable Opensuse Leap. Thanks David for any work on the issue! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kontact] [Bug 481024] The loss of user-defined snoozing for calendar and todo reminders is a massive functional regression and actually a hard show-stopper for my kontact usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024 --- Comment #14 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Two other potential "workarounds" for you (just for completion): * Stay on the elder version temporarily (to buy more time for a solution) * Go to Kontact from Trinity. It is still maintained > Bernhard, I know you once were well-connected into the upper tiers of KDE. > If this still holds true Unfortunately I do not know (anymore) whom to approach in this case. David of course used to be well connected as well. (*wave*) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kontact] [Bug 481024] The loss of user-defined snoozing for calendar and todo reminders is a massive functional regression and actually a hard show-stopper for my kontact usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024 --- Comment #10 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- I also find that the regression is a major one. (I've reported this in https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 among other significant usability problems.). To add more use cases: ### saving working time shortly before a meeting * I have many meetings where the reminder is 15 minutes, so I can prepare. * When this is checked I delay up to 2 minutes before the appointment, * and then I have the remaining minutes to completely concentrate on something else until the alarm rings when I get up and walk to the meeting room. * This I gain 12-8 minutes of working time. ### using several computers * I have at least three computers with Kontact, that all sync their appontments (using the stone-old Kolab 2 format for historical reasons). * When working from home once a week, I have to click away all appointments that have been there since last starting kontact on this machine. (This is not a delay use case, but... I mention it because:) The old kontact/korgac saved the delay in the internal memory and did not sync it on the machine. A property what would really improve the situation would be to sync the fire time of reminders to the servers and thus also record a potential new delay . So in @Flossy Cat's use case a delay for 3 days or so would be in the backup and also working across synced machines. I am not sure if the current status of the iCalender format - which is often used nowadays - allows it. It might. ## User Interface What about if the desktop notifications bring up a special korganizer/kontact view that holds all fired alarms for appointments, tasks and so on with options that allow at least what the old overview did and a compact overview? (Just an idea.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kontact] [Bug 481024] The loss of user-defined snoozing for calendar and todo reminders is a massive functional regression and actually a hard show-stopper for my kontact usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernh...@intevation.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 479851] Allow for a single text/html part to be saved decoded (as html file)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479851 --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- (In reply to Paul Schwabauer from comment #2) > Currently, it is possible to save emails as mbox files by right-clicking on > the message → "Save message". > This opens a file dialog with the only possibility to filter for `.mbox` > files. My proposal is to extend the filter to `.html` files and save the > HTML part if the file extension is `.html`. But won't this be a different semantic, saving a full email against saving just one body part? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 479851] Allow for a single text/html part to be saved decoded (as html file)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479851 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- A sister case is https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126130 for exporting a full email including everything as html. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 126130] [feature-request] add ability to save-as HTML
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126130 --- Comment #13 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Split out the save text/html part into https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479851 (Still this stays "confirmed" for kmail2 as I found no way to _export_ a full email as html.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 479851] New: Allow for a single text/html part to be saved decoded (as html file)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479851 Bug ID: 479851 Summary: Allow for a single text/html part to be saved decoded (as html file) Classification: Applications Product: kmail2 Version: 5.24.4 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: commands and actions Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- The use case is: Robin wants to save an HTML email to a file to open it with their favourite web browser, either to be more secure or to profit from the credentials saved in the particular browser. With an email with a single main Content-type: text/html, there is no way (I could find) to save this content as HTML file. Right now there is no attachment shown in the header and even in the email structure view there is no context menu (and thus no "save as" entry in the contect menu). Also the "Save attachments" functionality on the email does not work as it says: There is no attachment. How to reproduce: * Get hold of an email with only one Content-Type: text/html as main contents. * Display it with Kmail (reproduced with kmail2 5.24.4 (23.08.4)) * Try right click on the message, "Save Attachments". -> Observed: does not work with a message: there is no attachment Expected: Should work and ask for a .html filename. * Enable email structure view * right click on the main part -> Observed: no context menu -> expected: context menu that offers working "open" and "save-as" menu entries beside the common ones -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 126130] [feature-request] add ability to save-as HTML
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126130 --- Comment #12 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Okay, I start wondering, maybe I am in the wrong use case here. If the original reported wanted an export for the full email as HTML then it would include headers and different MIME parts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 126130] [feature-request] add ability to save-as HTML
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126130 --- Comment #11 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- With 5.24.4 it is still a problem. With an email with Content-type: text/html, there is no way (I could find) to save this as HTML file. The use case is: Robin wants to save an HTML email to a file to open it with their favourite web browser, either to be more secure or to profit from the credentials saved in the particular browser. Right now there is no attachment shown and even in the email structure view there is no context menu (and this no save as entry in the contect menu). Also the "Save attachments" functionality does not work as it says: There is no attachment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 126130] [feature-request] add ability to save-as HTML
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126130 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.3 |5.24.4 CC||bernh...@intevation.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 472426] Enable checking if OpenPGP encryption is possible by default
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472426 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Maybe the label of the option "Automatically encrypt messages when possible" is suboptimal because it does not mention the checking part (like trying to get the pubkey in the local storage via WKD or otherwise). Maybe it is an improvement to say: "Check if we can encrypt to recipients and enable encryption for an email if possible for all." or "Check if recipients offer to encrypt to them. Suggest to encrypt for an email automatically if possible". Both would explain better that there are two steps and that the suggestion can be ignored, by deselecting the encryption setting later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 472426] Enable checking if OpenPGP encryption is possible by default
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472426 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Enable OpenPGP encryption |Enable checking if OpenPGP |by default |encryption is possible by ||default -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 452296] Email won't be encrypted automatically
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452296 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- I think maybe https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472426 (Enable OpenPGP encryption by default) is better aiming in what this issues was intended to do. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 472426] New: Enable OpenPGP encryption by default
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472426 Bug ID: 472426 Summary: Enable OpenPGP encryption by default Classification: Applications Product: kmail2 Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: crypto Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- KMail shall enable encryption in the default configuration if my recipients want to get emails encrypted to them by OpenPGP/MIME. Many recipients that want to receive encrypted emails, publish their public OpenPGP via the web key directory standard (WKD). KMail shall check if they did. The can be enabled by the identity option: Automatically encrypt messages when possible" as shown with: https://wiki.gnupg.org/EMailClients/KMail STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. on a fresh account start kmail with vanilla settings, add an email account. be online. 2. open an new email 3. enter an email address for someone that has their OpenPGP pubkey published via WKD (e.g. mine at bernhard.rei...@intevation.de) Variant for 1: use an old account with a newer kmail. Expectation: KMail asks the user once that it enables the option during migration. OBSERVED RESULT Encryption is not enabled, it is not shown that this recipient offers to send them encrypted email. EXPECTED RESULT The indicator before the email address shows the public keys indication by the little icons. The encrypt button is enabled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Reminder Daemon] [Bug 465105] New: Reminding an hour off (for recurring events)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465105 Bug ID: 465105 Summary: Reminding an hour off (for recurring events) Classification: Frameworks and Libraries Product: Reminder Daemon Version: 5.22.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- For some appointements I get reminded an hour off. My guess is that those are recurring events that have been created in a different daylight saving time and they cross the daylight saving date. The events are shown with their correct time in Kontact(Korganizer). Operating System: openSUSE Leap 15.3 KDE Plasma Version: 5.26.4 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.101.0 Qt Version: 5.15.7 rpm -qa | grep korganizer- korganizer-22.12.0-lp153.210.1.x86_64 korganizer --version korganizer 5.22.0 (22.12.0) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Reminder Daemon] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #21 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- One more usability degradation: ### confusing "decline" button The reminding dialog per appointment remnder offer me a "decline" option (in German "Ablehnen"). I am unsure what is does. Usually "decline" (and more so "Ablehnen") for an appointment would mean that I want to refuse to make the appointment, especially when this is a meeting in the Kalender this would potentially mean that I inform the others that I will not participate in the meeting. I guess that this is not what the button does, it probably just declines being remined of this meeting. However that is not clear from the presentation of the dialog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Reminder Daemon] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #20 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Created attachment 149018 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=149018=edit Screenshot of German Reminder Dialog with "Ablehnen" Button -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #17 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Thanks Volker, for the additional background and explanation. So far I cannot say how others use the reminder functionality. And one difficulty of getting closer to this understand is that many important users will not run "beta" versions or freshly released ones, but are a few years down the line until their long term distribution will carry a new version. So feedback coming now will be skewed by this. My suggestion is to at least have an idea about what is continued to be supported and why. Personally my use case is in group (1) but I adjust the reminder according to the preparation time I need for different types of appointments. Then I sometimes use the delay of reminding me to get another few concentrated minutes. Example for meetings I invite people I usually have 15 minutes (which is a reminder they also get), then I can do preparations, like reading the protocol and agenda, shuffle my papers, open screens. Once I am say the reminder I may still have 11 minutes left, so I set the reminder to 9 minutes to be able to dive into another task. If I do not set the second reminder I may just dive up after 13 minutes, missing the start of the meeting. If I do not set the first reminder I maynot be prepared. On an appointment at my home I need to change and drive there, so I put the reminder to 30 minutes. For an appointment shortly after lunch, I set the reminder to 1 h, so to see it before lunch break. (This all are examples, but they all are a story about being reminded, not about task management as far as I understand it.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #15 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- (In reply to Volker Krause from comment #13) > We cannot have the same level of detail for the suspend time UI as the old > dialog had, system notifications are much more restricted in that regard. > However, there is certainly room to improve the current system. My first aim is to understand which uses the old system had (in the wild) and which of those got lost in the technical transition. I lack the overview to estimate if the technical change is an improvement in the summary. All I can do is to describe the uses I was missing (on first) sight. Any my use case was often to have a 15 minutes standard reminder and then when reacting to to the reminder, to push it back e.g. 2 minutes before the event. This was a variable time and it was good I could enter it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Akonadi] [Bug 453299] kalendarac: Notifications miss option to edit event directly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453299 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- I believe when clicking on the event text (not on the icon) it will send you to the event in korganizer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Akonadi] [Bug 453298] kalendarac: Notifications miss option to remind later with other time duration than 5 minutes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453298 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernh...@intevation.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #12 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- (In reply to Till Schäfer from comment #8) > I would like to add that the new notification also misses the remind later > function for other durations than 5 minutes. I agree with that observation, I also used this a lot and the functionality is gone now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #11 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- (In reply to Volker Krause from comment #7) > Click on the notification icon in the panel, that gives you a view which > shows all active notifications grouped by application/source, on the right > next to the application entry is a 'X' button that dismisses all > notifications of that group. Yes, works, thanks for the hint. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #6 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Thanks Volker (for the improvements). Any idea how I get a "dismiss all" only for appointments back? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #4 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- > single reminder notification popup (19.75 KB, image/png) 2022-04-06 15:15 This matches my memory. As you can see, the date is not indicated and if this was an event taking place yesterday, you may get the wrong impression. (I cannot say if https://invent.kde.org/pim/akonadi-calendar/-/merge_requests/15 improves the situation). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 452296] Email won't be encrypted automatically
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452296 Bernhard E. Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernh...@intevation.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- > In which desktop shell are you running this? Plasma, as indicated. (There may or maynot be settings that restore part of the behaviour, but I did not find them easily.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 452264] New: Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452264 Bug ID: 452264 Summary: Appointment reminder handling reduces usability and functionality between 21.12.3 and 22.03.80 Product: korganizer Version: 5.19.80 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: reminder daemon (korgac) Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- SUMMARY Reminder behaviour changed between kontact 21.12.3 and 22.03.80 Now they do not have a seperate window anymore, but come as part of the desktop notifications. This reduces functionality and usability. Reminder behaviour changed between kontact 21.12.3 and 22.03.80 Now they do not have a seperate window anymore, but come as part of the desktop notifications. Problems with the new behaviour that the old one did not have: * Each reminder does not show the date, so a reminder from a few days ago look like they are due today. * There is no overview anymore of all appointment due since last start and in timely order. * Lost the functionality to dismiss all reminders at once. * When clicking the calendar icon, the Kontact calendar does not open. (Needs to click the text itself to open the calendar.) Observed the change after the switch from the following version on an OpenSuse Leap system: 2022-03-05 10:14:39|install|kontact|21.12.3-lp153.178.1|x86_64||KDE-Applications|c862e0234bdd0804f08590d9ba921804c3d87307b0cfb745220f0ed19c18bf86| 2022-04-01 22:06:01|install|kontact|22.03.80-lp153.179.1|x86_64||KDE-Applications|a76922e914e46311d47fb104d28c8d731d9c7e781c1ff65ec98fc340af9975a0| STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. create a number appointments (with old kontact in my case) 2. wait until they were due, e.g. a few days 3. start system (with implicit starting akonadi) OBSERVED RESULT You get all past due reminders, each in its own little notification windows. The window does not show the date, so reminder from two days ago looks like it is taking place now. There is no button to dismiss all reminders. There is no overview of all reminders, if they do not fit in some are just not shown. EXPECTED RESULT The usability for overview and handling should be preserved or superceded. (If there is a possibility to configure the system to behave similiar or better, it should be the default.) Each reminder should display the data and make clear it is not today, when it isn't. Clicking the calendar should open the kontact calendar app (or whatever did the reminding entry). SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS GNU/Linux/KDE Plasma: Opensuse Leap 15.3 + KDE. Kontact Version 5.19.80 alpha (22.03.80) KDE-Plasma-Version: 5.24.4 KDE-Frameworks-Version: 5.92.0 Qt-Version: 5.15.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Akonadi] [Bug 436693] akonadi_icaldir_resource does not write events/calender entries to directory
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436693 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- The problem was also seen with kdepim-runtime-20.12.1-lp152.245.2.x86_64 which was 5.16.x . For the test I've createda fresh resource. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Akonadi] [Bug 436693] New: akonadi_icaldir_resource does not write events/calender entries to directory
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436693 Bug ID: 436693 Summary: akonadi_icaldir_resource does not write events/calender entries to directory Product: Akonadi Version: 5.17.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: ICal dir resource Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- SUMMARY The "iCal Calendar Folder" resource does not save the iCalender files to the configured path (as it is expected). STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. In Kontact add a new calender resource, select "iCal Calendar Folder" 2. Configure it to use path in your home directory like "/home/bern/kontact/locally-saved-events" 3. Add a few events in kontact (to this calender resource) 4. Use kontact a while, sync the resource. 5. Shutdown kontact / akonadi OBSERVED RESULT find /home/bern/kontact/locally-saved-events does not find any files EXPECTED RESULT Each calender entry should give an iCalender file in this directory. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Operating System: openSUSE Leap 15.2 KDE Plasma Version: 5.21.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.81.0 Qt Version: 5.15.2 Kernel Version: 5.3.18-lp152.72-default OS Type: 64-bit Graphics Platform: X11 rpm package: kdepim-runtime-21.04.0-lp152.255.1.src.rpm ADDITIONAL INFORMATION akonadiconsole shows that there are events in the resource and the resource itself is configured as is, no problems visible. The mysql backend is used as database for akonadi. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 431153] Crash in MessageComposer::MessageFactoryNG::createForwardDigestMIME() when trying to forward a group of emails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431153 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter --- Thanks, Laurent! (A happy new year to you!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 431153] New: Crash in MessageComposer::MessageFactoryNG::createForwardDigestMIME() when trying to forward a group of emails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431153 Bug ID: 431153 Summary: Crash in MessageComposer::MessageFactoryNG::createForwardDigest MIME() when trying to forward a group of emails Product: kmail2 Version: 5.16.0 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: commands and actions Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Target Milestone: --- SUMMARY Forwarding as MIME digest crashes kmail. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. select three emails (I had them in the INBOX and three in a row) 2. press "f" for forwarding them 3. answer as MIME digest by the upcoming pop-up dialog OBSERVED RESULT Crash Application: Kontact (kontact), signal: Segmentation fault [KCrash Handler] #4 0x7f90d74463d1 in KMime::Headers::Generics::Parametrized::setParameter(QString const&, QString const&) () at /usr/lib64/libKF5Mime.so.5 #5 0x7f90cce78d9d in MessageComposer::MessageFactoryNG::createForwardDigestMIME(QVector const&) () at /usr/lib64/libKF5MessageComposer.so.5 #6 0x7f90ce07b69c in () at /usr/lib64/libkmailprivate.so.5 EXPECTED RESULT Composer opens with the three emails attached. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS GNU/Linux/KDE Plasma: OpenSuse 15.1 (with new KDE repos) (available in About System) KDE Plasma Version: 5.20.4 lp151.567.1 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.77.0 Qt Version: 5.15.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The problem could be reproduced with three simple text messages. (As well as with others) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kleopatra] [Bug 385390] Kleopatra unable to archive and encrypt whole folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385390 Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://dev.gnupg.org/T3470 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- https://dev.gnupg.org/T3470 is a related GpgEx problem report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[kleopatra] [Bug 370442] Certificate creation gives general error, if expiry date is beyond 2038
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370442 Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Version|unspecified |2.3.0 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- I can confirm the problem with Kleopatra 2.3.0-gpg4win-3.0.0-beta276. How to reproduce: * Start OpenPGP keypair creation. * Use advanced options to set an expiration date far in the future, e.g. 2080 -> General error. The included gpg 2.1.22 can create such a key pair, but only after confirmation and will display -??-?? as expiration data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 310815] Warning that deleting an attachment is irreversible
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310815 --- Comment #7 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- @Denis, of course I appreciate your work in KDE and the issue tracker in particular, cleaning up is very important! I did ask, because your short comment did not explain the situation for me. My suggestion would be that you should link a more official statement. Your last statement reads like "4.14 KDEPIM" would be unmaintained. If this would be really the case I think we should notify all distributions about it. Getting 4.14 from Ubuntu, Debian or OpenSuse or any other GNU/Linux distribution is then just a security risk. So my hope is that the policy is different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 310815] Warning that deleting an attachment is irreversible
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310815 --- Comment #5 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- @Denis, if this is a defect for current 4.14, will you still close it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kleopatra] [Bug 363309] certificates signed through marginal trusted certificates are incorrectly displayed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363309 Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- Hi Andre, to me this is a clear defect in the current gui. The gui aims to be for power users (aka Bob and Annika in https://wiki.gnupg.org/EasyGpg2016/VisionAndStories ). And the GUI claims to help you manage the Web of Trust, which some power users still want to do. In the Web of Trust (and some other trust context) a trusted certificate comes with a strong indication that it belongs to the userid and is a base for trusting other certificates. A certificate that is marginally trusted should not fall in this category, at least it is missleading. The certificate in questions falls in the category "some trust" and when in doubt this meant: not enough trust. If a user starts to understand the WoT implementation of GnuPG, she will be surprised by the different behaviour of the kleopatra display and the GnuPG backend. If there is an easy fix, it probably should also be done on older product lines as long as they are still in usage. Best, Bernhard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[kmail2] [Bug 361368] New: option to delete multipart/alternative attachments missing, e.g. text/html
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361368 Bug ID: 361368 Summary: option to delete multipart/alternative attachments missing, e.g. text/html Product: kmail2 Version: 4.14.10 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: commands and actions Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de In Kontact Mail 3.5 it was possible to delete the text/html alternative attachments in multipart/alternative emails. For example by using the context menu in the view that show the email structure on the text/html alternative and choose "delete attachment". Kontact Mail 4.14.10 misses this function. Because it is a functional degration without catering the use case differently I consider it a bug. Use case: Often the size of the text/html alternative part is very large compared to the text/plain part that contains all information. The reader of the email wants to keep a record of the email in a space saving way. Scenarios that illustrate the use case: There is a quota on the email folders when using imap. Some emails may be required to be kept for archival purposes by tax law. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. look at an html email that is send as multipart/alternative 2. try to delete the text/html branch including the image attachments. Actual Results: Found no way to do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 325571] option to delete all attachments
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325571 Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.11.2 |4.14.10 CC||bernh...@intevation.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Summary|delete all attachments |option to delete all ||attachments --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- Hi, the option to delete all attachment is still missing in 4.14.10 desktop version of Kontact Mail. My use case is: The reader wants to record in a space saving way that the email correspondence has happened after the many attachments of an email has been used (saved). Personally I would expect this option in the context menus of the attachments in the header and the mail structure view. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 312276] removing (deleting) an attachment loses the email contents as well for some mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312276 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |grave Version|4.9.4 |4.14.0 Priority|NOR |HI --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- Conforming the problem is still there with Source RPM : kdepim4-4.14.1-1.2.src.rpm Distribution: KDE:Current / openSUSE_13.1 Architecture: x86_64 Upgrading importance to HI and severity to grave as this is loss of data and the email really is gone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 312276] removing (deleting) an attachment loses the email contents as well for some mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312276 --- Comment #4 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- If it cannot be fixed the function for deleting an attachment should be disabled temporarily to prevent data loss. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 312276] New: removing (deleting) an attachment loses the email contents as well for some mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312276 Bug ID: 312276 Summary: removing (deleting) an attachment loses the email contents as well for some mails Classification: Unclassified Product: kmail2 Version: 4.9.4 Hardware: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: CONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: commands and actions Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de On one of my emails I lose the contents of the email when deleting an jpg attachment. Expected behaviour is to just remove the image attachment and leave the other attachments alone. The result after using the remove attachment option from the context menu is: You deleted an attachment from this message. The original MIME headers for the attachment were: Content-Type: image/pjpeg name=XYZ filename=XYZ The email is not public, here is a description of its structure: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Content-Type: multipart/alternative Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: image/pjpeg; name=XYZ rpm -qi kontact Version : 4.9.4 Release : 1.1 Architecture: x86_64 Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sa 01 Dez 2012 12:01:24 CET, Key ID 27c070176f88bb2f Source RPM : kdepim4-4.9.4-1.1.src.rpm Build Date : Sa 01 Dez 2012 11:53:12 CET Vendor : obs://build.opensuse.org/KDE Reproducible: Always I go to major, because if this action is used, the contents of the email is lost and cannot be recovered. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310815] Warning that deleting an attachment is irreversible
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310815 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED CC||bernh...@intevation.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|wishlist|normal --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- I consider this a usability defect of normal category. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 312276] removing (deleting) an attachment loses the email contents as well for some mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312276 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- Created attachment 76044 -- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=76044action=edit Test email1 showing the problem Import test email1 from the mbox, click once on the email to see the body message, click somewhere else, now show the email use the context menu on the image and remove attachment action. Confirm the question and see that the content of the email is gone instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 86920] time/size based auto-expiration of the messages in the given folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86920 --- Comment #8 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- @Myriam, I'd say that KMail1 is in deep maintenance mode. Intevation and KDAB still maintain the the enterprise35 functionality of KMail(1). I agree that wishes and reports should now be verified against Kontact Mail Thanks for responding to the reporter and helping to triage reports! This is really important! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 300819] Fontend not reporting full filesystem for akonadi/file_db_data (resulting in Sync hangs)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300819 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Sync hangs on N9 does not |Fontend not reporting full |recover with offline - |filesystem for |online |akonadi/file_db_data ||(resulting in Sync hangs) --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- Also updated to akonadi Version: 1.7.50.20120604.gitdeec1f8deec1f-1maemo6.3 it turned out this was a problem related to the filesystem. I have synced a rather large account and thus I've moved the akonadi data store too the MyDocs partition which is vfat and larger as outlined in http://userbase.kde.org/Kontact_Touch/Harmattan#Additional_Notes While there is still space on the partition the error message by akonadi is: Insert: payload file /home/user/.local/share//akonadi/file_db_data/141229_r0 could not be open for writing! Error: No space left on device Turns out there are already a large number of files in that directory: ls|wc 32764 and there is a limit ~/MyDocs/akonadi/file_db_data $ touch x touch: x: No space left on device So the workaround seems to be that I need to tune akonadi to create less files in that directory. Which would have been okay. if the error message would have reached me as a user. So I am refocussing this issuse towards: Problem description: A filesystem problem (cannot create new files) must be reported to the user by the frontend. Current behaviour: A sync hang which is not recoverable. Rationale: The effects of the defect are severe, as the client get unusable. Filesystem issues can appear under normal usage and the user may be able to recover from the situation by other means if informed. E.g. the user may be able to remove some folders within Kontact or make space on the used filesystem by other means. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 300819] Sync hangs on N9 does not recover with offline - online
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300819 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aheine...@intevation.de, ||bernh...@intevation.de Summary|Sync hangs during mobile|Sync hangs on N9 does not |connection (gprs or UTMS) |recover with offline - |on N9 does not recover with |online |offline - online | --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de --- Meanwhile I also observed a similiar hang on a WLAN connection. So it does not depend on the mobile (UTMS / GPRS) connection status and I've broadened the subject. Andre, maybe the akonadi-server version does make a difference, at least the NEWS file of 1.6.90 lists something about - Update agent interface to include collectionTreeSynchronized signal. and I'm not sure if 1.6.50 has this already or if it is related at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 300819] New: Sync hangs during mobile connection (gprs or UTMS) on N9 does not recover with offline - online
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300819 Bug ID: 300819 Severity: major Version: unspecified Priority: NOR Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Summary: Sync hangs during mobile connection (gprs or UTMS) on N9 does not recover with offline - online Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: bernh...@intevation.de Hardware: Meego/Harmattan Status: NEW Component: general Product: KDE PIM Mobile When online with the GPRS or UTMS connection, folder syncs very soon hang, so they stay at a random percentange and don't move anymore. This situation occurs for all syncs in larger folders, when using the mobile connection. It does not occur with the WLAN connection. Switching to offline and then to online again usually changes the sync percentage to something lower and hangs there. Closing the Kontact Touch Mail frontend and reopening it does not help. Version installed: ii kmail-mobile 4:4.9~.20120521.git084e17ba-1maemo6.6 ii kdepimlibs-kio-plugins 4:4.9~20120521.git9360eadef-maemo6.6 ii kdepim-runtime 4:4.8+20120521.git8ce8c5b0-1maemo6.2 ii akonadi-server 1.6.50.20120516.gitdeec1f-1maemo6.2 I've also notived the issue with previous revision. When using the same N9 and its internet connection via an ideapad with Kontact Touch, there is no hang. So maybe the N9 does something special when it is using the mobile internet connection? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 245880] During Kontact refactoring2010: sending of all mails failed for all users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 --- Comment #8 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-09-12 08:31:39 --- Stephan, thanks for thorough checking, reporting back and for testing Kontact in general! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 245880] sending mails failed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 --- Comment #6 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-08-25 08:49:14 --- Stephan, I believe this was a defect that was within the codebase last year, especially during an intensive time of development. This has been fixed in the codebase for long. Most problems with sending email now will be much more specific. I try to adapt the title better so that this report is not found as often. For you I recommend to first report the issue to your GNU distribution and packagers to exclude problems there. Once packaging and setup issues are rules out, a report here in a new issue is really appreciated! Thanks, Bernhard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 245880] During Kontact refactoring2010: sending of all mails failed for all users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|sending mails failed|During Kontact ||refactoring2010: sending of ||all mails failed for all ||users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 276620] Mark EMail Actions spikes Virtuoso CPU usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276620 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI Severity|normal |major -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 276620] Mark EMail Actions spikes Virtuoso CPU usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276620 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernh...@intevation.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 276620] Mark EMail Actions spikes Virtuoso CPU usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276620 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #4 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-07-01 10:59:37 --- I think it does deserve major severity because it makes Kontact on Windows a lot less usable. It has a major impact on usability, as far as I can tell right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 276620] Mark EMail Actions spikes Virtuoso CPU usage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276620 --- Comment #6 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-07-01 14:59:16 --- Being so slow that users refrain from using it, would in my view qualify as a major loss of an important proptery. But of course I cannot be sure that this issues is the only cause, so maybe major it too early to tell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 258350] choose special transport dialog: Not possible to select second account
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258350 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|choose special tranport |choose special transport |dialog: Not possible to |dialog: Not possible to |select second account |select second account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 269127] Menu entry is not visible in Kontact Touch Mail Flap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269127 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|Maemo 5 |Windows CE OS/Version|Linux |Windows CE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 269127] Menu entry is not visible in Kontact Touch Mail Flap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269127 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernh...@intevation.de, ||to...@kde.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 --- Comment #7 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-03-16 11:36:23 --- Meanwhile some defects in libkleo got fixed that should avoid the several threads for one verification problem. It still hangs, reports Tobias, so we need a GPGME_DEBUG 9 log and lsof -p processid outputs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|kdepim-bugs@kde.org |to...@kde.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-03-11 09:16:21 --- Created an attachment (id=57855) -- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=57855) gpgme 5 log of testrun which gets stuck Got stuck on the first gpgme_op_decrypt_verify -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 --- Comment #4 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-03-11 09:51:01 --- Created an attachment (id=57857) -- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=57857) a level 9 gpgsm log showing the hang on N900, search for MARK For reference here is a level 9 gpgme debug log (as Werner asked for). How to create it: On the command line of the N900: export GPGME_DEBUG=9:/home/user/20110311-gpgme-4.txt kmail-mobile on a second shell you can enter several markers into the log file so you can later add overall information about what you have done echo MARK: 20110311-gpgme-4.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 --- Comment #5 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-03-11 10:49:57 --- (10:46:15) werner: What I can see from the logs is that Kmail runs 9 VERIFY operations on the same data: MARK: Now trying to decrypt and verify it: GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:15 0x4a397480 chan_30 - DECRYPT GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:17 0x4ab97480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:18 0x4ab97480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:19 0x4a397480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:21 0x4a397480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:22 0x4ab97480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:22 0x4a397480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:23 0x4ab97480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:23 0x4a397480 chan_31 - VERIFY GPGME 2011-03-11 09:42:24 0x4ab97480 chan_31 - VERIFY MARK: decryption seems to have worked, but verifying is hung, (10:46:49) werner: This is a bit fishy. I can't see any hangs in gpgme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||to...@kde.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 --- Comment #6 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-03-11 11:15:34 --- Running it with --nofork in gdb seems to look like a thread is started several times, though no changes in the interface, when trying to decrypt and verify: [New LWP 4628] [LWP 4628 exited] [New LWP 4632] [LWP 4632 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4636] [LWP 4636 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4639] [LWP 4639 exited] [New LWP 4642] [LWP 4642 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4645] [LWP 4645 exited] [New LWP 4648] [LWP 4648 exited] [New LWP 4651] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [LWP 4651 exited] [New LWP 4654] [LWP 4654 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4657] [LWP 4657 exited] [New LWP 4660] [LWP 4660 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4663] [LWP 4663 exited] [New LWP 4666] [LWP 4666 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4669] [LWP 4669 exited] [New LWP 4672] [LWP 4672 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4675] [LWP 4675 exited] [New LWP 4678] [LWP 4678 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// [New LWP 4681] [LWP 4681 exited] [New LWP 4684] [LWP 4684 exited] QTextBrowser: No document for file:/// -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] New: Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 Summary: Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive Product: KMail Mobile Version: unspecified Platform: Maemo 5 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: komo3 Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bernh...@intevation.de I can reproduce on the N900 and the HTC Touch Pro2, that after a few crypto operations, the crypto thread of kmail-mobile seems to hang. Symptoms: No other crypto operations completes in Kontact Touch Mail. Can still operate and switch to other email otherwise. Can do crypto operations on the command line. No dirmngr and no gpgsm running. gpg-connect-agent gets prompt from the gpg-agent. kontact-mobile getting all available CPU seen on top. How to reproduce: E.g send yourself three emails: Signed only, signed and encrypted, encrypted only. Switch between all those emails back and forth. After doing this up a few times (usually three times is enough), the symptoms occur. N900 Package: kdepim-mobile Version: 4:4.6~.20110211.1251.git9d81e94-1maemo1.1219908 Package: libqt4-experimental-gui Version: 4.7.0~git2010-0maemo1 Config-Version: 4.7.0~git2010-0maemo1 HTC Touch pro2: Version build 20110217-1613 (I believe) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 268138] Crypto operations like verify and decrypt hang in the mail frontend after a few operations, cpu intensive
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268138 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-03-10 16:30:03 --- Oh, on the N900 it does not use dirmngr which in this version has other defects: cat .gnupg/gpgsm.conf disable-crl-checks prefer-system-dirmngr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263018] Organizer Mobile uses emtpy VTIMEZONE section in invitations - breaking them
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263018 --- Comment #20 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-02-28 12:37:53 --- As discussed yesterday: On CE we also can send TZID + VTIMEZONE for the timezone we are currently in. Andre, can you make the change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263018] Organizer Mobile uses emtpy VTIMEZONE section in invitations - breaking them
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263018 --- Comment #18 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-02-24 16:34:54 --- Added a testscript for this here: http://kolab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs-kolab.cgi/utils/testing/test-send-invitations-timezone.py Results: test1) invalid VCALENDER with TZID=Europe/Berlin, but missing the corresponding VTIMEZONE: OL 2003 cannot, it will display the event at the wrong time, assuming UTC without further notice. This ss a stricter rfc interpretation then OL 2007. OL 2007 can deal with it. Thus it interprets the name. (No idea how many names it knows, though.) test2 and test3) with TZID and good VTIMEZONE info (created by Kontact Touch N900 4:4.6~.20110211.1251.git9d81e94-1maemo1.1219908 carrige returns fixed manually) Both OL 2003 and OL 2007 can deal with it. One test included a repeated appointment accross one sometime change. test4) Repeating appointment in UTC (created by Kontact Touch CE being at the same time) OL 2003 will display and calculate it from the first appointment and adjust for the sommertime shift. So Kontact Touch and CE are displaying the same. OL 2007 will behave stricter towards the RFC and warn the user in the appointment that it repeats in GMT+0 having no timezone, displaying the GMT time! When accepting the appointments they are at the right time in UTC shown at two different times in Berlin/Europe. test5 test6) Both OL 2003 and OL 2007 can display single UTC events. Lifetime of tested Outlook versions (inquired at http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselectindex, can be longer according to http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy) Outlook 2003 mainstream support ended 2009, extended support until Aug 2014 Outlook 2007 mainstream support until April 2012, extended s until April 2017 Conclusion: To be compatible with both versions of Outlook tested for recurrent events, we would need to send a proper VTIMEZONE with use of the TZID. It is okay to send VTIMEZONE with the use of TZID for singe instance events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263018] Organizer Mobile uses emtpy VTIMEZONE section in invitations - breaking them
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263018 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #17 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-02-15 12:21:13 --- @Tokoe: We did _not_ establish that Kontact Desktop e35 or Outlook is not correct. Uncorrect is the behaviour of Kontact Touch to use a TZID which is not defined properly as VTIMEZONE. (See my comment #14.) Re Comment #15: I have to correct myself about Outlook 2007 behaviour: My test was not conclusive, as floating time and correct time were the same. It could be that Outlook 2007 correctly interpets the TZID without VTIMEZONE as floating time. Note that as far as I have understood Kontact Touch on MS CE cannot create VTIMEZONE entries. If this is the case only Kontact Touch on CE must use UTC and we still have to decide about what other versions should do. If Outlook behaviour with TZID and VTIMEZONE is correct, then all versions of Kontact (that can) should create it, I'd say. According to #16 Kontact Touch still does not use UTC for recurrences. If so, code should be changed IMO to use UTC for recurrances on CE only. [o] Correct behaviour in this comment means according to (my interpretation) of http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt(correctly according to RFC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263018] Organizer Mobile uses emtpy VTIMEZONE section in invitations - breaking them
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263018 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||win...@kde.org --- Comment #15 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-02-14 15:43:04 --- Interesting enough: Outlook 2007 (12.0.6423.1000) SP2 MSO (12.0.6425.1000) on Windows Vista (both German) did correctly display an appointment with no VTIMEZONE, but: DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20110211T155900 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20110211T175900 So the behavior is different for OL 2003 and OL 2007. :/ The behaviour seems not matching the standard: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt, which has a possiblity for a global TZ databse in the future but indicated with a leading '/' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263867] Cannot see my attendee status in the event detailed view and editor, when I have conditionally accepted.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263867 --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-02-08 12:40:18 --- Tobias, which version in particular? (If possible Ludwig, Björn or Andre can do the tests.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263865] Modifying an event where I am a participant, changes me to organizer without asking
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263865 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-01-31 17:05:15 --- When I am an attendee, I should not change the appointment, only the organizer should do this and then send an update. If I still want to change it, I need to get asked if I want to become the organizer. Changing my acceptance status later should not lead to change of the appointment itself, but to an email from myself to the organizer (and nobody else). Bad behaviour in this version was that the email did not go the the organizer, but to the other attendees. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 264604] New: outlook compatible invitations are still send as attachment must be in the body
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264604 Summary: outlook compatible invitations are still send as attachment must be in the body Product: KOrganizer Mobile Version: unspecified Platform: Windows CE OS/Version: Windows CE Status: NEW Keywords: komo3 Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bernh...@intevation.de windows-ce/Kontact-Mobile/testing/2011-01-25-18-46/ enable outlook compatible invitation sending in the mail configuration. create an appointment and invite somebody. check the raw email code of the invitation email, Expectation: the ics should be in the main body, _no_ multipart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263118] Quicksearch in threads prevents me to go back to message list
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263118 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 262735] Group by date message up sometimes, e.g. showing yesterday - saturday - yesterday - saturday
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262735 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 253222] Cannot send mails from appointment details view
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253222 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI --- Comment #3 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-01-28 10:54:30 --- Remove button as solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263792] scrollbar handle scrolls in the wrong direction when dragged
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263792 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI --- Comment #2 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-01-28 10:56:23 --- Scrollbar gone is acceptabel, if scrolling still works when the display is full of appointments. (should work according to volker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263600] sending certificates by mail doesn't work
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263600 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 264498] New: sending encrypted emails, cannot select a certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264498 Summary: sending encrypted emails, cannot select a certificate Product: KMail Mobile Version: unspecified Platform: Windows CE OS/Version: Windows CE Status: NEW Keywords: komo3 Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bernh...@intevation.de If I have no OpenPGP and no S/MIME certificate that contains my email address and I select encryption, I must get a selection dialog so I can choose one from the certificates I have. windows-ce/Kontact-Mobile/testing/2011-01-25-18-46/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 264498] sending encrypted emails, cannot select a certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264498 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 259989] Regression: New Mail does not open in full screen window
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259989 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263874] calendar: leaving maintenance mode does not clear set quick search filter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263874 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |HI Summary|calendar: cannot clear set |calendar: leaving |filter |maintenance mode does not ||clear set quick search ||filter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263839] calendar config: Calendar inside, Category outside should be default (day and month view)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263839 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |LO Severity|wishlist|minor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 257924] Fetching keys does not work (Identities - cryptography tab)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257924 --- Comment #11 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-01-21 10:00:40 --- David, I wasn't sure, because it is strange that gpg gives output that gpg2 does not. I believe this is where we need to check what the issue is. Try gpg2 -vvv --list-secret-keys and gpg2 -vvv --debug-all --list-secret-keys. Also check the permission on all in .gnupg, should not be root. You may ping me if we are both online for interactive debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 255305] Account wizard first page display problem after scrolling down and up
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255305 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #10 from Bernhard E. Reiter bernhard intevation de 2011-01-21 11:05:35 --- For clarification, I've set severity to normal now which reflects that N900 is second place for the komo3 contract. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 257774] Files are not filtered correctly from external storage when adding contact image
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257774 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |LO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263847] New: no progress indicator for full search of objects
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263847 Summary: no progress indicator for full search of objects Product: KDE PIM Mobile Version: unspecified Platform: Windows CE OS/Version: Windows CE Status: NEW Keywords: komo3 Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bernh...@intevation.de Depends on: 258676 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #258676 +++ version: 20101203.1203110-1maemo1 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Send a mail to the test account (subject: Devil) 2. Look if the mail in the inbox. 3. Actions/Mail/Search for Mails 4. Enter Devil in the textfield and activate subject. 5. Search Same can be done for events. Retested with windows-ce/Kontact-Mobile/testing/2011-01-17-02-23/ Objects are found now, but for a while the search dialog claims that 0 objects are found. There should be a indicator that the search is not yet completed, so that users are not irritated if the search takes a while until the objects are found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 258676] full search of mails doesn't find a message
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258676 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||263847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 263847] no progress indicator for full search of objects
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263847 Bernhard E. Reiter bernh...@intevation.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|NOR |LO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
