Re: realtek wireless modules

2016-10-10 Thread Laura Abbott 

On 10/10/2016 11:53 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Josh Boyer  wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Peter Robinson  wrote:

Hi Laura, Justin, et el,

I've been playing with a handful of cheap USB wireless modules for
support on the Raspberry Pi and other similar devices.

I've noticed that there's a bunch of overlap regarding usb IDs between
the newer (and IMO preferred) rtl8xxxu and the vendor collection of
drivers so you often get both drivers loaded. I've tended to fix this
by just blacklisting the vendor upstream drivers.


Wait, that's a situation that exists upstream?


Yes, the first two commits to the new driver [1][2] sort of cover it
as "it doesn't support all the functionality of the vendor driver" and
mention that IDs should be moved over. I'm not sure if the dual
loading is because missing patches to drop ID overlaps, still missing
functionality (AP or ad-hoc at a guess) or just a general oversight.

[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=26f1fad29ad973b0fb26a9ca3dcb2a73dde781aa
[2] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=033695bdf6d79180f74893830053fcf3e8bc9d24


The question is how best to deal with this in a generic way to ensure
a good experience with these in Fedora?

Do we cross reference all the USB IDs and disable the non rtl8xxxu
drivers once they have full coverage in rtl8xxxu? Do we actively patch
out the IDs supported in rtl8xxxu from associated drivers?


I'd suggest posing this question on the upstream wireless list, with
the various driver maintainers CC'd.  If it's an upstream problem then
it really needs solving upstream.


Yes, I realise that, I've not done any analysis as to how much overlap
there is, or functionality difference. I'd suspected it might be the
case but only worked it out actually was last week. I thought I'd ask
here first in case there was known reasons for the driver overlap that
I'd missed.

Peter


For my benefit, can you list the specific USB ids and configs that are
causing conflicts so I can keep an eye out?

Thanks,
Laura
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: realtek wireless modules

2016-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Josh Boyer  wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Peter Robinson  wrote:
>> Hi Laura, Justin, et el,
>>
>> I've been playing with a handful of cheap USB wireless modules for
>> support on the Raspberry Pi and other similar devices.
>>
>> I've noticed that there's a bunch of overlap regarding usb IDs between
>> the newer (and IMO preferred) rtl8xxxu and the vendor collection of
>> drivers so you often get both drivers loaded. I've tended to fix this
>> by just blacklisting the vendor upstream drivers.
>
> Wait, that's a situation that exists upstream?

Yes, the first two commits to the new driver [1][2] sort of cover it
as "it doesn't support all the functionality of the vendor driver" and
mention that IDs should be moved over. I'm not sure if the dual
loading is because missing patches to drop ID overlaps, still missing
functionality (AP or ad-hoc at a guess) or just a general oversight.

[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=26f1fad29ad973b0fb26a9ca3dcb2a73dde781aa
[2] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=033695bdf6d79180f74893830053fcf3e8bc9d24

>> The question is how best to deal with this in a generic way to ensure
>> a good experience with these in Fedora?
>>
>> Do we cross reference all the USB IDs and disable the non rtl8xxxu
>> drivers once they have full coverage in rtl8xxxu? Do we actively patch
>> out the IDs supported in rtl8xxxu from associated drivers?
>
> I'd suggest posing this question on the upstream wireless list, with
> the various driver maintainers CC'd.  If it's an upstream problem then
> it really needs solving upstream.

Yes, I realise that, I've not done any analysis as to how much overlap
there is, or functionality difference. I'd suspected it might be the
case but only worked it out actually was last week. I thought I'd ask
here first in case there was known reasons for the driver overlap that
I'd missed.

Peter
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: realtek wireless modules

2016-10-10 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis 
Hi! On 10.10.2016 20:02, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> I've been playing with a handful of cheap USB wireless modules for
> support on the Raspberry Pi and other similar devices.
> 
> I've noticed that there's a bunch of overlap regarding usb IDs between
> the newer (and IMO preferred) rtl8xxxu and the vendor collection of
> drivers so you often get both drivers loaded. I've tended to fix this
> by just blacklisting the vendor upstream drivers.

FWIW: the rtl8723au driver is removed from mainline with 4.9
(https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/b49f6ab951 ). Maybe it might be
feasible to simply disable it in our configs in advance of that change.

This is just meant as a data point, as I guess such a config adjustment
would not solve the problem completely.

CU, knurd
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: realtek wireless modules

2016-10-10 Thread Josh Boyer 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Peter Robinson  wrote:
> Hi Laura, Justin, et el,
>
> I've been playing with a handful of cheap USB wireless modules for
> support on the Raspberry Pi and other similar devices.
>
> I've noticed that there's a bunch of overlap regarding usb IDs between
> the newer (and IMO preferred) rtl8xxxu and the vendor collection of
> drivers so you often get both drivers loaded. I've tended to fix this
> by just blacklisting the vendor upstream drivers.

Wait, that's a situation that exists upstream?

> The question is how best to deal with this in a generic way to ensure
> a good experience with these in Fedora?
>
> Do we cross reference all the USB IDs and disable the non rtl8xxxu
> drivers once they have full coverage in rtl8xxxu? Do we actively patch
> out the IDs supported in rtl8xxxu from associated drivers?

I'd suggest posing this question on the upstream wireless list, with
the various driver maintainers CC'd.  If it's an upstream problem then
it really needs solving upstream.

josh
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

realtek wireless modules

2016-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson 
Hi Laura, Justin, et el,

I've been playing with a handful of cheap USB wireless modules for
support on the Raspberry Pi and other similar devices.

I've noticed that there's a bunch of overlap regarding usb IDs between
the newer (and IMO preferred) rtl8xxxu and the vendor collection of
drivers so you often get both drivers loaded. I've tended to fix this
by just blacklisting the vendor upstream drivers.

The question is how best to deal with this in a generic way to ensure
a good experience with these in Fedora?

Do we cross reference all the USB IDs and disable the non rtl8xxxu
drivers once they have full coverage in rtl8xxxu? Do we actively patch
out the IDs supported in rtl8xxxu from associated drivers?

Peter
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org