Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] New configs in arch/powerpc
From: Steve Best on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/615#note_537179030 Acked-by: Steve Best ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] [redhat] New configs in arch/powerpc
From: Steve Best on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/730#note_537178636 Acked-by: Steve Best ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Add git config hook
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/340#note_537094529 closing this as not necessary for right now. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.11.9-200.fc33 (fedora-33)
Hello, We ran automated tests on the following kernel build: Kernel package: kernel-5.11.9-200.fc33 Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64501742 The results of these automated tests are provided below. Overall result: PASSED Tests: OK All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here: https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/03/24/627328 Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective. For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message. ,-. ,-. ( C ) ( K ) Continuous `-',-.`-' Kernel ( I ) Integration `-' __ Hardware testing We booted each kernel and ran the following tests: aarch64: Host 1: ✅ Boot test ✅ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test ✅ xfstests - ext4 ✅ xfstests - xfs ✅ xfstests - btrfs ✅ Storage blktests ✅ Storage block - filesystem fio test ✅ Storage block - queue scheduler test ✅ Storage nvme - tcp ✅ Storage: lvm device-mapper test ❌ stress: stress-ng Host 2: ✅ Boot test ✅ ACPI table test ✅ LTP ✅ CIFS Connectathon ✅ Loopdev Sanity ✅ Memory: fork_mem ✅ Memory function: memfd_create ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity ppc64le: Host 1: ✅ Boot test ✅ LTP ✅ CIFS Connectathon ✅ Loopdev Sanity ✅ Memory: fork_mem ✅ Memory function: memfd_create ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity Host 2: ✅ Boot test ✅ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test ✅ xfstests - ext4 ✅ xfstests - xfs ✅ xfstests - btrfs ✅ Storage blktests ✅ Storage block - filesystem fio test ✅ Storage block - queue scheduler test ✅ Storage nvme - tcp ✅ Storage: lvm device-mapper test s390x: Host 1: ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture. This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested. ⚡⚡⚡ Boot test ⚡⚡⚡ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests ⚡⚡⚡ Storage nvme - tcp ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng Host 2: ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture. This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested. ⚡⚡⚡ Boot test ⚡⚡⚡ LTP ⚡⚡⚡ CIFS Connectathon ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity ⚡⚡⚡ Memory: fork_mem ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity Host 3: ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture. This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested. ⚡⚡⚡ Boot test ⚡⚡⚡ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests ⚡⚡⚡ Storage nvme - tcp ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng Host 4: ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture. This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested. ⚡⚡⚡ Boot test ⚡⚡⚡ LTP ⚡⚡⚡ CIFS Connectathon ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity ⚡⚡⚡ Memory: fork_mem ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity x86_64: Host 1: ✅ Boot test ✅ ACPI table test ✅ LTP ✅ CIFS Connectathon ✅ Loopdev Sanity ✅ Memory: fork_mem ✅ Memory function: memfd_create ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity Host 2: ✅ Boot test ✅ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test ✅ xfstests - ext4 ✅ xfstests - xfs ✅ xfstests - btrfs ✅ xfstests - nfsv4.2 ✅ xfstests - cifsv3.11 ✅ Storage blktests ✅ Storage block - filesystem fio test ✅ Storage block - queue scheduler test ✅ Storage nvme - tcp ✅ Storage: lvm device-mapper test ✅ stress: stress-ng Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests! Aborted tests - Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡. If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that explicitly in the report.
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] [redhat] New configs in drivers/clk
From: Mark Salter on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/832#note_537080492 The files are empty. Nacked-by: Mark Salter ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/6] Enable hardened configs for Fedora and ARK
From: Augusto Caringi on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/961#note_537052073 @jpoimboe I agree with you, my mistake. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Is it acceptable to package non-bootable kernels?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:47:28PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > I don't have a problem with this particular use case, it is not a > > "kernel" package, and would not be mistaken as the proper kernel in any > > sort of a real context. > > Perfect! > With this in mind, I guess we can simply go ahead and file the bug for > adding the package to Fedora. Cool, that matches with my surface-level reaction too so I'm glad the people who know the details are also on the same page. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[OS-BUILD PATCH] drm/i915/tgl/psr: Disable PSR on Tigerlake for now
From: Lyude Paul
drm/i915/tgl/psr: Disable PSR on Tigerlake for now
Currently PSR2 appears to be broken on TGL which causes some pretty nasty
refresh issues. Intel doesn't have a fix for this quite yet, and this
definitely affects a couple of OEM machines shipping with Fedora.
We don't have a better workaround for the time being, so just disable PSR2
outright for Tigerlake by default until this gets fixed.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Cc: Jared Dominguez
Cc: Mark Pearson
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3134
diff a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1817,9 +1817,14 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
*/
dev_priv->hsw_psr_mmio_adjust = _SRD_CTL_EDP -
_HSW_EDP_PSR_BASE;
- if (dev_priv->params.enable_psr == -1)
- if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 || !dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable)
+ if (dev_priv->params.enable_psr == -1) {
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 || !dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable) {
dev_priv->params.enable_psr = 0;
+ } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 12) {
+ /* See
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3134 */
+ dev_priv->params.enable_psr = 0;
+ }
+ }
/* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/981
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/6] Enable hardened configs for Fedora and ARK
From: Josh Poimboeuf on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/961#note_536920780 Thanks for the merge. It looks like the commits were squashed into a single commit? It would have been better to preserve the individual changes. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
