Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Enable support for SN2201 system
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2136#note_1163208877 Why is this driver being enabled everywhere? From the Kconfig: "The processor used on SN2201 is Intel Atom®Processor C Series, C3338R which is one of the Denverton product families." So it should just be enabled on x86. Interestingly also it has deps on various REGMAP which while seemingly already enabled in ark/RHEL they're not enabled via the RHEL config so probably needs further explicit enablement so it's documented as such. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Enable WWAN feature and support for Intel, Qualcomm and Mediatek devices
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2133#note_1163205670 LGTM ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat: Force remove tmp file
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135#note_1163073892 I see. But I mean you could have folded it in just one line: ```rm -f vmlinux.o .tmp_vmlinux.btf``` ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat: Force remove tmp file
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135#note_1163059065 Resolve thread. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat: Force remove tmp file
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135#note_1163058937 Fixed. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat: Force remove tmp file
From: Prarit Bhargava
redhat: Force remove tmp file
If BTF is not enabled in the kernel config then .tmp_vmlinux.btf will not
exist. The rpm build will throw an error because the file doesn't exist.
Use 'rm -f' to delete the .tmp_vmlinux.btf file.
Reported by: stan
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100755
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -1683,7 +1683,8 @@ BuildKernel() {
%endif
# Remove large intermediate files we no longer need to save space
-rm vmlinux.o .tmp_vmlinux.btf
+rm vmlinux.o
+rm -f .tmp_vmlinux.btf
# Start installing the results
install -m 644 .config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] fs: fix leaked psi pressure state
From: Johannes Weiner
fs: fix leaked psi pressure state
When psi annotations were added to to btrfs compression reads, the psi
state tracking over add_ra_bio_pages and btrfs_submit_compressed_read was
faulty. A pressure state, once entered, is never left. This results in
incorrectly elevated pressure, which triggers OOM kills.
pflags record the *previous* memstall state when we enter a new one. The
code tried to initialize pflags to 1, and then optimize the leave call
when we either didn't enter a memstall, or were already inside a nested
stall. However, there can be multiple PageWorkingset pages in the bio, at
which point it's that path itself that enters repeatedly and overwrites
pflags. This causes us to miss the exit.
Enter the stall only once if needed, then unwind correctly.
erofs has the same problem, fix that up too. And move the memstall exit
past submit_bio() to restore submit accounting originally added by
b8e24a9300b0 ("block: annotate refault stalls from IO submission").
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/y2uhrqthnuwui...@cmpxchg.org
Fixes: 4088a47e78f9 ("btrfs: add manual PSI accounting for compressed reads")
Fixes: 99486c511f68 ("erofs: add manual PSI accounting for the compressed
address space")
Fixes: 118f3663fbc6 ("block: remove PSI accounting from the bio layer")
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/d20a0a85-e415-cf78-27f9-77dd7a94b...@leemhuis.info/
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis
Tested-by: Thorsten Leemhuis
Cc: Chao Yu
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: David Sterba
Cc: Gao Xiang
Cc: Jens Axboe
Cc: Josef Bacik
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/compression.c b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/compression.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static u64 bio_end_offset(struct bio *bio)
static noinline int add_ra_bio_pages(struct inode *inode,
u64 compressed_end,
struct compressed_bio *cb,
-unsigned long *pflags)
+int *memstall, unsigned long *pflags)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
unsigned long end_index;
@@ -581,8 +581,10 @@ static noinline int add_ra_bio_pages(struct inode *inode,
continue;
}
- if (PageWorkingset(page))
+ if (!*memstall && PageWorkingset(page)) {
psi_memstall_enter(pflags);
+ *memstall = 1;
+ }
ret = set_page_extent_mapped(page);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -670,8 +672,8 @@ void btrfs_submit_compressed_read(struct inode *inode,
struct bio *bio,
u64 em_len;
u64 em_start;
struct extent_map *em;
- /* Initialize to 1 to make skip psi_memstall_leave unless needed */
- unsigned long pflags = 1;
+ unsigned long pflags;
+ int memstall = 0;
blk_status_t ret;
int ret2;
int i;
@@ -727,7 +729,7 @@ void btrfs_submit_compressed_read(struct inode *inode,
struct bio *bio,
goto fail;
}
- add_ra_bio_pages(inode, em_start + em_len, cb, &pflags);
+ add_ra_bio_pages(inode, em_start + em_len, cb, &memstall, &pflags);
/* include any pages we added in add_ra-bio_pages */
cb->len = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
@@ -807,7 +809,7 @@ void btrfs_submit_compressed_read(struct inode *inode,
struct bio *bio,
}
}
- if (!pflags)
+ if (memstall)
psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&cb->pending_ios))
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -1412,8 +1412,8 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct
z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
struct block_device *last_bdev;
unsigned int nr_bios = 0;
struct bio *bio = NULL;
- /* initialize to 1 to make skip psi_memstall_leave unless needed */
- unsigned long pflags = 1;
+ unsigned long pflags;
+ int memstall = 0;
bi_private = jobqueueset_init(sb, q, fgq, force_fg);
qtail[JQ_BYPASS] = &q[JQ_BYPASS]->head;
@@ -1463,14 +1463,18 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct
z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
if (bio && (cur != last_index + 1 ||
last_bdev != mdev.m_bdev)) {
submit_bio_retry:
- if (!pflags)
- psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
submit_bio(bio);
+ if (memstall) {
+ psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
+ memstall = 0;
+ }
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Test tmp file before deleting
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135#note_1162936472 Wouldn't it be better to just use ```rm -f``` instead of adding the if? ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Enable support for SN2201 system
From: Ivan Vecera redhat: Enable support for SN2201 system Enable support for platform devices used on Nvidia SN2201 switch system. Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NVSW_SN2201 b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NVSW_SN2201 index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NVSW_SN2201 +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NVSW_SN2201 @@ -1 +1 @@ -# CONFIG_NVSW_SN2201 is not set +CONFIG_NVSW_SN2201=m -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2136 ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Test tmp file before deleting
From: Prarit Bhargava
redhat: Test tmp file before deleting
If BTF is not enabled in the kernel config then .tmp_vmlinux.btf will not
exist. The rpm build will throw an error because the file doesn't exist.
Test for the existence of .tmp_vmlinux.btf before deleting it.
Reported by: stan
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100755
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -1683,7 +1683,10 @@ BuildKernel() {
%endif
# Remove large intermediate files we no longer need to save space
-rm vmlinux.o .tmp_vmlinux.btf
+rm vmlinux.o
+if [ -f .tmp_vmlinux.btf ]; then
+ rm .tmp_vmlinux.btf
+fi
# Start installing the results
install -m 644 .config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Possible error in the 6.1 rc3 kernel spec file
On 11/7/22 09:57, stan via kernel wrote: Hi, I built the 6.1 rc3 kernel over the weekend, and on the first build it failed. The error was this line in the spec file: # Remove large intermediate files we no longer need to save space # rm vmlinux.o .tmp_vmlinux.btf The error was that the [a path in tmp I don't remember]/.tmp_vmlinux.btf file did not exist. There was no complaint about the vmlinux.o file. As you can see, because of the helpful comment, I knew that it was only a space issue, so I just commented the line and everything built successfully after that. Perhaps this should be protected with if [-f .tmp_vmlinux.btf] rm .tmp_vmlinux.btf fi ? MR here: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2135 P. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Possible error in the 6.1 rc3 kernel spec file
On 11/7/22 09:57, stan via kernel wrote: Hi, I built the 6.1 rc3 kernel over the weekend, and on the first build it failed. The error was this line in the spec file: # Remove large intermediate files we no longer need to save space # rm vmlinux.o .tmp_vmlinux.btf The error was that the [a path in tmp I don't remember]/.tmp_vmlinux.btf file did not exist. There was no complaint about the vmlinux.o file. As you can see, because of the helpful comment, I knew that it was only a space issue, so I just commented the line and everything built successfully after that. Perhaps this should be protected with if [-f .tmp_vmlinux.btf] rm .tmp_vmlinux.btf fi ? Makes sense to me. The file will only exist if BTF is enabled in the config, so checking for it's existence is valid IMO. I'll submit an MR for this. P. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] configs: enable CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED everywhere
From: Patrick Talbert configs: enable CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED everywhere This should have been enabled in !2089. Signed-off-by: Patrick Talbert diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED deleted file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 0 --- a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -# CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED is not set diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED rename from redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED rename to redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_LRU_GEN_ENABLED -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2134 ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Possible error in the 6.1 rc3 kernel spec file
Hi, I built the 6.1 rc3 kernel over the weekend, and on the first build it failed. The error was this line in the spec file: # Remove large intermediate files we no longer need to save space # rm vmlinux.o .tmp_vmlinux.btf The error was that the [a path in tmp I don't remember]/.tmp_vmlinux.btf file did not exist. There was no complaint about the vmlinux.o file. As you can see, because of the helpful comment, I knew that it was only a space issue, so I just commented the line and everything built successfully after that. Perhaps this should be protected with if [-f .tmp_vmlinux.btf] rm .tmp_vmlinux.btf fi ? I know it won't matter to the stock fedora kernel (it has to be general), but I used the new fixed number of cpus setting, after editing the config file to change the setting (from 8 to 6), and it is working fine. Just in case anyone else wants to try it. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Enable CONFIG_EFI_SECRET module
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2124#note_1162434713 Not until upstream changes (I expect them to, but it hasn't happened yet): ``` config EFI_SECRET tristate "EFI secret area securityfs support" depends on EFI && X86_64 ``` ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Enable CONFIG_EFI_SECRET module
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2124#note_1162383857 It would only have the effect of turning it on for ark/aarch64 which we should be doing, but it should clean up the others in the process. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Enable CONFIG_EFI_SECRET module
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2124#note_1162366072 I am not quite sure the purpose of this MR. The config option is already turned on in RHEL and in Fedora, though in different places. ``` cat redhat/configs/ark/generic/x86/CONFIG_EFI_SECRET CONFIG_EFI_SECRET=m cat redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_EFI_SECRET CONFIG_EFI_SECRET=m ``` This MR is not a clean-up as it does not delete either of these entries. It does not change the RHEL config in practice, because the option depends on X86_64 at this point. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Enable WWAN feature and support for Intel, Qualcomm and Mediatek devices
From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez redhat: Enable WWAN feature and support for Intel, Qualcomm and Mediatek devices Add configs to enable WWAN feature and support for Intel, Qualcomm and Mediatek devices. Besides, WWAN hwsim feature has been added because it is very helpful for testing purposes. As the use will not be habitual, it is added to extra. Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX deleted file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 0 --- a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -# CONFIG_MTK_T7XX is not set diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_IOSM b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_IOSM index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_IOSM +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_IOSM @@ -1 +1 @@ -# CONFIG_IOSM is not set +CONFIG_IOSM=m diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM @@ -1 +1 @@ -# CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM is not set +CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM=m diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX rename from redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX rename to redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MTK_T7XX diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM @@ -1 +1 @@ -# CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM is not set +CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM=m diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM deleted file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 0 --- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -CONFIG_MHI_WWAN_MBIM=m diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM deleted file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 0 --- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -# CONFIG_WWAN_HWSIM is not set diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/x86/CONFIG_IOSM b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/x86/CONFIG_IOSM deleted file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 0 --- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/x86/CONFIG_IOSM +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -CONFIG_IOSM=m diff --git a/redhat/fedora_files/mod-extra.list.fedora b/redhat/fedora_files/mod-extra.list.fedora index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/fedora_files/mod-extra.list.fedora +++ b/redhat/fedora_files/mod-extra.list.fedora @@ -191,5 +191,6 @@ wanrouter.ko warrior.ko whci.ko wire.ko +wwan_hwsim.ko yam.ko zhenhua.ko diff --git a/redhat/rhel_files/mod-extra.list.rhel b/redhat/rhel_files/mod-extra.list.rhel index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhel_files/mod-extra.list.rhel +++ b/redhat/rhel_files/mod-extra.list.rhel @@ -188,5 +188,6 @@ wanrouter.ko warrior.ko whci.ko wire.ko +wwan_hwsim.ko yam.ko zhenhua.ko -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2133 ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv5] redhat/configs: Disable fbdev drivers and use simpledrm everywhere
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1533#note_1162124009 Thank you Lyude! @jmflinuxtx we need you too 🤦. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Move ark/generic/s390x/CONFIG_ZSMALLOC to common/generic
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2127#note_1162096129 /block ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
