The kernel-ark os-build branch has been rebased
Please rebase any pending MRs and repush. As we have done since 5.15, we have done this again for os-build, we expect to keep it up as a cadence with every upstream release. This means we will do it again when 6.5 releases, and again with 6.6... It is difficult to manage a regularly rebased tree, because any outstanding MR is invalidated and has to also be rebased. But not doing somewhat regular rebases can also be difficult in the spirit of the openness that Fedora is based upon. While there are plenty of ways to see which patches we carry compared to upstream, some of those patches are fairly old, and would not apply cleanly at all to a modern tree after several releases were merged in with them. As we have gotten into a flow of things with merge requests, we can get to the point of very few outstanding MRs towards the end of a release cycle, and that makes it an opportune time to rebase the tree. This also means that the patches we carry should be no more than 1 release out of date, making them easier to apply to various other trees. I do realize that this is a minor inconvenience every 2-3 months, but I believe the results are worth it. Thanks, Justin ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: aarch64: move CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 to common
From: Mark Salter on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2526#note_1445876970 Yeah, I was updating some gic code for RHEL which brought this into RHEL. It was a kneejerk reaction to just keep the ark =y without giving it a thought. I'll update the MR to turn it off for RHEL. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/10] CI: script cleanup part3
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2519#note_1445269079 is the `|| exit 1` really needed? Normally GitLab CI snippets run under `set -o errexit` ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/3] CI: simple script cleanups part1
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2517#note_1445266033 is the `|| exit 1` really needed? Normally GitLab CI snippets run under `set -o errexit` 樂 ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
