Kernel 6.7 Test Week is underway!
Hey Folks, As most of you might know, Kernel 6.7 Test Week is currently happening[0] I have figured out that, I can't login to FAS from the Kernel Test Result site[1]. If you are also someone who is stuck, please follow the infra issue filed here[2]. And please submit the results here[3] If you have still not participated and have some free time, we urge you to take part in testing! We are also sorry for the inconvenience caused due to login issues. Thanks for testing :) [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-01-21_Kernel_6.7_Test_Week [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kerneltest/ [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11744 [3] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/173 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/2] Add new os-build targets: rt-devel and automotive-devel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2732#note_1746337464 @scweaver - big update. most of it is just using 'local'. But alot more robustness around missing branches. Then the rebases keep breaking because things are corrupted, so removed a bunch of fragile ideas. Now the thing can corrupt all its branches and rebuild itself successfully. I think i just need to add the .gitlab-ci.yaml changes for the cronjob piece. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv8 2/2] Add new os-build targets: rt-devel and automotive-devel
From: Don Zickus
Add new os-build targets: rt-devel and automotive-devel
This is an attempt to automate the rt and automotive devel branches
using the upstream linux-rt-devel tree as the base combined with
os-build.
The overall process isn't too complicated but there are enough steps to
make it compilicated.
Steps:
* map upstream linux-rt-devel to master-rt branch
* update os-build
* grab linux version from master-rt and os-build
* if version the same then merge os-build and master-rt to
os-build-rt-automated
* else merge tag kernel-N.V.0-0 and master-rt to os-build-rt-automated until
master-rt is update to os-build
* merge os-build-rt-automated into os-build-rt-devel
* merge os-build-rt-automated into os-build-automotive-devel
* run the generate pending-rhel config scripts on rt-devel and
automotive-devel
The script has beginning logic to handle rebasing if necessary when the
rt-devel branch transitions from os-build-stable (linux-stable) to linux
master again.
NOTE: The script uses kernel-N.V.0-0 which is rebased after os-build
linux-x.y GA is created but before linux-x.y+1 pre-rc1 merges happen.
The reason for this is because linux-stable-x.y doesn't exist until
linux-x.y+1-rc1 exists thus leaving linux-stable-x.y-1 in the meantime.
An awkward gap exists, use kernel-N.V.0-0 as the base.
The script has no effect on the day-to-day operations of os-build. They
are designed to be run from a gitlab cron job and update in the
background. Once they are deemed stable, adding ARK MRs that target
either os-build-rt-devel or os-build-automotive-devel will be possible
and those branches can start proper parallel developement with os-build.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
diff --git a/redhat/scripts/ci/ark-ci-env.sh b/redhat/scripts/ci/ark-ci-env.sh
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/scripts/ci/ark-ci-env.sh
+++ b/redhat/scripts/ci/ark-ci-env.sh
@@ -8,24 +8,188 @@ die()
ci_pre_check()
{
- if test -n "${TO_PUSH}"; then
- if test -z "${GITLAB_PROJECT_URL}" || test -z
"$GITLAB_PROJECT_PUSHURL"; then
- echo "To enable git-push, please run:"
- echo "git remote add gitlab "
- echo "git remote set-url --push gitlab "
+ if test -z "${GITLAB_PROJECT_URL}" || test -z
"$GITLAB_PROJECT_PUSHURL"; then
+echo "To enable git-push, please run:"
+ echo "git remote add gitlab "
+ echo "git remote set-url --push gitlab "
+ if test -n "${TO_PUSH}"; then
die "Misconfigured 'gitlab' entry for git"
fi
fi
git diff-index --quiet HEAD || die "Dirty tree, please clean before
merging."
}
+# wrapper around branches that may not be exist yet
+ark_git_branch()
+{
+ local target_branch="$1"
+ local source_branch="$2"
+
+ # switch to branch if it exists otherwise create and set to source
+ # branch
+ git show-ref -q --heads "$target_branch" || \
+ git branch "$target_branch" "$source_branch"
+}
+
+# GitLab can only mirror one project at a time. This wrapper function does
+# the mirroring for any other branches.
+ark_git_mirror()
+{
+ local target_branch="$1"
+ local upstream_tree="$2"
+ local source_branch="$3"
+ local reset_branch="$4"
+
+ prev_branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
+ remote_branch="$upstream_tree/$source_branch"
+ ark_git_branch "$target_branch" "$remote_branch"
+ git checkout "$target_branch"
+ git fetch "$upstream_tree" "$source_branch"
+ if test -z "$reset_branch"; then
+ git merge "$remote_branch" || die "git merge $remote_branch
failed"
+ else
+ git reset --hard "$remote_branch" || die "git reset
$remote_branch failed"
+ fi
+ git checkout "$prev_branch"
+}
+
+# Merge wrapper in case issues arise
+ark_git_merge()
+{
+ local source_branch="$1"
+ local target_branch="$2"
+ local reset_branch="$3"
+
+ prev_branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
+ ark_git_branch "$target_branch" "$source_branch"
+ git checkout "$target_branch"
+ if test -n "$reset_branch"; then
+ # there are cases when the initial merge is a reset
+ git reset --hard "$source_branch" || die "git reset
$source_branch failed"
+ elif ! git merge -m "Merge '$source_branch' into '$target_branch'"
"$source_branch"; then
+ git merge --abort
+ printf "Merge conflict; halting!\n"
+ printf "To reproduce:\n"
+ printf "* git checkout %s\n" "${target_branch}"
+ printf "* git merge %s\n" "${source_branch}"
+ die "Merge conflicts"
+ fi
+
+ git checkout "$prev_branch"
+ return 0
+}
+
+ark_git_rebase()
+{
+ local branch="$1"
+ local upstream="$2"
+ local base="$3"
+
+
[OS-BUILD PATCHv8 1/2] Add python3-pyyaml to buildreqs for kernel-docs
From: Justin M. Forbes
Add python3-pyyaml to buildreqs for kernel-docs
Upstream commit f061c9f7d058f added a script to parse the Netlink YAML
specs and generate RST files. As a result, we need python3-pyyaml for
"make htmldocs" to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ BuildRequires: bpftool
BuildRequires: rsync
%endif
%if %{with_doc}
-BuildRequires: xmlto, asciidoc, python3-sphinx, python3-sphinx_rtd_theme
+BuildRequires: xmlto, asciidoc, python3-sphinx, python3-sphinx_rtd_theme,
python3-pyyaml
%endif
%if %{with_sparse}
BuildRequires: sparse
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2732
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/2] Add new os-build targets: rt-devel and automotive-devel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2732 This is an attempt to automate the rt and automotive devel branches using the upstream linux-rt-devel tree as the base combined with os-build. The overall process isn't too complicated but there are enough steps to make it compilicated. Steps: * map upstream linux-rt-devel to master-rt branch * update os-build * grab linux version from master-rt and os-build * if version the same then merge os-build and master-rt to os-build-rt-automated * else merge linux-stable and master-rt to os-build-rt-automated until master-rt is update to os-build * merge os-build-rt-automated into os-build-rt-devel * merge os-build-rt-automated into os-build-automotive-devel * run the generate pending-rhel config scripts on rt-devel and automotive-devel The script has beginning logic to handle rebasing if necessary when the rt-devel branch transitions from linux-stable to linux master again. The script has no effect on the day-to-day operations of os-build. They are designed to be run from a gitlab cron job and update in the background. Once they are deemed stable, adding ARK MRs that target either os-build-rt-devel or os-build-automotive-devel will be possible and those branches can start proper parallel developement with os-build. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus --- redhat/scripts/ci/ark-ci-env.sh | 178 - redhat/scripts/ci/ark-merge-rt.sh | 173 redhat/kernel.spec.template |2 +- 3 files changed, 345 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/3] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2892#note_1746180214 OK, I missed that `create-data.sh` runs the `make setup-source` multiple times in parallel (and I failed to test it with `-j`). Here is a second take that should address that problem: !2913 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 4/4] redhat/Makefile: remove an unused target
From: Ondrej Mosnacek redhat/Makefile: remove an unused target The $(REDHAT)/rpm/SOURCES/$(SPECFILE) target, which just aliases dist-sources seems to serve no actual purpose, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile +++ b/redhat/Makefile @@ -832,11 +832,6 @@ _dist-brew _dist-koji: _dist-%: dist-vr-check dist-srpm _distg-brew _distg-koji: _distg-%: dist-vr-check $* $(BUILD_PROFILE) build $(BUILD_FLAGS) --scratch $(BUILD_TARGET) "$(RHGITURL)?redhat/koji#$(RHGITCOMMIT)" -.PHONY: $(REDHAT)/rpm/SOURCES/$(SPECFILE) -$(REDHAT)/rpm/SOURCES/$(SPECFILE): - @echo "dist-sources" - @$(MAKE) dist-sources - dist-git-test: export RH_DIST_GIT_TEST="1" dist-git-test: dist-git -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2913 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 3/4] redhat/Makefile: fix setup-source and document its caveat
From: Ondrej Mosnacek
redhat/Makefile: fix setup-source and document its caveat
The current definition of setup-source is racy, since it may cause
dist-clean-sources and _setup-source to be "built" in parallel and the
former caould then remove the results of the latter. Fix it to ensure
the right ordering and document the condition that must be preserved to
keep dist-clean-sources from racing with other targets.
_setup-source (and this race) has been introduced in commit 0cce4209d1cc
("redhat/Makefile: Split up setup-source target") in order to be called
from redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh, where multiple source preps
can run in parallel. Make create-data.sh call the full setup-source and
use the existing RHSELFTESTDATA variable as an indication that
dist-clean-sources should be skipped.
Fixes: 0cce4209d1cc ("redhat/Makefile: Split up setup-source target")
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek
diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/Makefile
+++ b/redhat/Makefile
@@ -574,10 +574,11 @@ dist-clean-configs:
@cd $(REDHAT)/configs; rm -f kernel-*.config kernel-*.config.orig
kernel-*.config.tmp partial-*-snip.config
dist-clean-sources:
+# skip dist-clean-sources when generating test data to prevent race condition
+ifndef RHSELFTESTDATA
@rm -f $(RPM)/SPECS/*
- @for i in $(SOURCES)/*; do \
- rm -f $$i; \
- done;
+ @rm -f $(SOURCES)/*
+endif
dist-clean-rpmdirs:
@for i in $(RPM)/{BUILD,SRPMS,RPMS,SPECS}/*; do \
@@ -638,7 +639,11 @@ dist-get-buildreqs: setup-source
echo "PASS: All build dependencies found."; \
fi
-_setup-source: dist-git-version-check
+# IMPORTANT: All targets whose recipes read/modify files under $(SOURCES)
+# MUST depend on setup-source (at least indirectly). Otherwise such
+# recipes may be ordered before/in parallel with dist-clean-sources
+# (prerequisite of setup-source), which would then delete their results.
+setup-source: dist-clean-sources dist-git-version-check
@if [ ! -e $(REDHAT)/$(SPECFILE).template ]; then \
echo "Creating $(REDHAT)/$(SPECFILE).template as a copy of
$(REDHAT)/kernel.spec.template"; \
cp $(REDHAT)/kernel.spec.template
$(REDHAT)/$(SPECFILE).template; \
@@ -660,8 +665,6 @@ _setup-source: dist-git-version-check
@$(REDHAT)/scripts/genspec/genspec.sh
@cp $(SOURCES)/$(SPECFILE) $(SOURCES)/../SPECS/
-setup-source: dist-clean-sources _setup-source
-
generate-testpatch-tmp:
@$(GIT) diff --no-renames HEAD ":(exclude,top).get_maintainer.conf" \
":(exclude,top).gitattributes" \
diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh
b/redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh
index blahblah..blahblah 100755
--- a/redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh
+++ b/redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ specfile_helper () {
specfilename=$1
cp ./kernel.spec.template "${varfilename}.spec.template"
- make RHSELFTESTDATA=1 SPECFILE="${specfilename}.spec" DIST="${DIST}"
DISTRO="${DISTRO}" HEAD="${commit}" _setup-source
+ make RHSELFTESTDATA=1 SPECFILE="${specfilename}.spec" DIST="${DIST}"
DISTRO="${DISTRO}" HEAD="${commit}" setup-source
grep -Fvx -f "${specfilename}.spec.template"
"${sources}/${specfilename}.spec" > "${destdir}"/"${specfilename}".spec
# Ignore bpftoolversion definition as it may change.
sed -i '/^%define bpftoolversion /d' "${destdir}"/"${specfilename}".spec
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2913
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 2/4] redhat/Makefile: fix race condition when making the KABI tarball
From: Ondrej Mosnacek redhat/Makefile: fix race condition when making the KABI tarball The recipe for $(KABI_TARBALL) references the kabi/kabi-current file, but it doesn't depend on the target that creates it (dist-kabi), leading to possible build failures under parallel build (make -j). Fix it by making $(KABI_TARBALL) depend on dist-kabi. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile +++ b/redhat/Makefile @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ $(TARBALL): @scripts/create-tarball.sh .PHONY: $(KABI_TARBALL) -$(KABI_TARBALL): +$(KABI_TARBALL): dist-kabi @(cd kabi && tar -cJf $(KABI_TARBALL) kabi-rhel$(RHEL_MAJOR)* kabi-current) .PHONY: $(KABIDW_TARBALL) -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2913 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 1/4] redhat/Makefile: refactor KABI tarball creation
From: Ondrej Mosnacek redhat/Makefile: refactor KABI tarball creation Place $(KABI_TARBALL) and $(KABIDW_TARBALL) in $(REDHAT) instead of $(SOURCES) and only link/copy them into $(SOURCES) in _setup-source, same as is done with $(TARBALL). This allows removing duplicate steps to make the KABI tarballs from _setup-source, while avoiding a race with dist-clean-sources (which could otherwise remove the tarballs after being created, because setup-source depends on it). Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile +++ b/redhat/Makefile @@ -331,9 +331,9 @@ endif TARFILE:=linux-$(SPECTARFILE_RELEASE).tar.xz TARBALL:=$(REDHAT)/$(TARFILE) -KABI_TARBALL:=$(SOURCES)/kernel-abi-stablelists-$(SPECKABIVERSION).tar.xz +KABI_TARBALL:=$(REDHAT)/kernel-abi-stablelists-$(SPECKABIVERSION).tar.xz KABIDW := $(REDHAT)/kabi-dwarf -KABIDW_TARBALL:=$(SOURCES)/kernel-kabi-dw-$(SPECKABIVERSION).tar.xz +KABIDW_TARBALL:=$(REDHAT)/kernel-kabi-dw-$(SPECKABIVERSION).tar.xz # Taken from tools/lib/bpf/Makefile SPECBPFTOOLVERSION:=$(shell \ @@ -586,6 +586,8 @@ dist-clean-rpmdirs: dist-clean: dist-clean-sources dist-clean-configs dist-clean-rpmdirs @rm -f $(REDHAT)/linux-*.tar.xz + @rm -f $(REDHAT)/kernel-abi-stablelists-*.tar.xz + @rm -f $(REDHAT)/kernel-kabi-dw-*.tar.xz dist-stub-key: @echo "Copying pre-generated keys"; @@ -668,8 +670,9 @@ generate-testpatch-tmp: ":(exclude,top)Makefile.rhelver" \ ":(exclude,top)redhat" > $(TESTPATCH).tmp -sources-rh: $(TARBALL) generate-testpatch-tmp setup-source dist-configs-check - @cp -l $(TARBALL) $(SOURCES)/ || cp $(TARBALL) $(SOURCES)/ +sources-rh: $(TARBALL) $(KABI_TARBALL) $(KABIDW_TARBALL) generate-testpatch-tmp setup-source dist-configs-check + @cp -l $(TARBALL) $(KABI_TARBALL) $(KABIDW_TARBALL) $(SOURCES)/ || \ + cp $(TARBALL) $(KABI_TARBALL) $(KABIDW_TARBALL) $(SOURCES)/ @touch $(TESTPATCH) @diff $(TESTPATCH).tmp $(TESTPATCH) > /dev/null || \ echo "WARNING: There are uncommitted changes in your tree or the changes are not in sync with linux-kernel-test.patch. Either commit the changes or run 'make dist-test-patch'" @@ -711,11 +714,6 @@ sources-rh: $(TARBALL) generate-testpatch-tmp setup-source dist-configs-check cp kabi/Module.kabi_$$KABIARCH $(SOURCES)/; \ cp kabi/Module.kabi_dup_$$KABIARCH $(SOURCES)/; \ done - @(cd kabi && tar -cJf $(KABI_TARBALL) kabi-rhel$(RHEL_MAJOR)* kabi-current) - @if [ ! -d $(KABIDW)/base ]; then \ - mkdir -p $(KABIDW)/base; \ - fi - @(cd kabi-dwarf && tar -cJf $(KABIDW_TARBALL) base run_kabi-dw.sh) dist-sources: dist-kabi dist-kabi-dup sources-rh diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 +++ b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 @@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ INCLUDE_FEDORA_FILES=1 INCLUDE_RHEL_FILES=1 INCLUDE_RT_FILES=1 KABIDW=../redhat/kabi-dwarf -KABIDW_TARBALL=../redhat/rpm/SOURCES/kernel-kabi-dw-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.el7.tar.xz +KABIDW_TARBALL=../redhat/kernel-kabi-dw-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.el7.tar.xz KABI_CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu- /usr/bin/ppc64le-linux-gnu- /usr/bin/s390x-linux-gnu- KABI_CROSS_COMPILE_PREFIX=/usr/bin/ KABI_CROSS_COMPILE_SUFFIX=-linux-gnu- KABI_SUPPORTED_ARCHS=aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64 -KABI_TARBALL=../redhat/rpm/SOURCES/kernel-abi-stablelists-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.el7.tar.xz +KABI_TARBALL=../redhat/kernel-abi-stablelists-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.el7.tar.xz LANG=C LOCVERFILE=../localversion MACH=x86_64 diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 +++ b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 @@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ INCLUDE_FEDORA_FILES=1 INCLUDE_RHEL_FILES=1 INCLUDE_RT_FILES=1 KABIDW=../redhat/kabi-dwarf -KABIDW_TARBALL=../redhat/rpm/SOURCES/kernel-kabi-dw-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.fc25.tar.xz +KABIDW_TARBALL=../redhat/kernel-kabi-dw-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.fc25.tar.xz KABI_CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu- /usr/bin/ppc64le-linux-gnu- /usr/bin/s390x-linux-gnu- KABI_CROSS_COMPILE_PREFIX=/usr/bin/ KABI_CROSS_COMPILE_SUFFIX=-linux-gnu- KABI_SUPPORTED_ARCHS=aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64 -KABI_TARBALL=../redhat/rpm/SOURCES/kernel-abi-stablelists-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.fc25.tar.xz +KABI_TARBALL=../redhat/kernel-abi-stablelists-5.16.0-0.rc5.6.test.fc25.tar.xz LANG=C LOCVERFILE=../localversion MACH=x86_64 diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.el7 index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.el7 +++
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic (v2)
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2913 Since !2892 was buggy and had to be reverted, this is a second attempt, hopefully correct this time. --- redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-df0cc57e057f.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-df0cc57e057f.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-fce15c45d3fb.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-fce15c45d3fb.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh | 2 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-2585cf9dfaad.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-78e36f3b0dae.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-78e36f3b0dae.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-df0cc57e057f.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-df0cc57e057f.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-fce15c45d3fb.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-fce15c45d3fb.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-2585cf9dfaad.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-78e36f3b0dae.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-78e36f3b0dae.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-df0cc57e057f.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-df0cc57e057f.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-fce15c45d3fb.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-fce15c45d3fb.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/Makefile| 38 +++-- 26 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/4] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic (v2)
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2913 Since !2892 was buggy and had to be reverted, this is a second attempt, hopefully correct this time. --- redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-78e36f3b0dae.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-df0cc57e057f.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-df0cc57e057f.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-fce15c45d3fb.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/centos-fce15c45d3fb.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/create-data.sh | 2 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-2585cf9dfaad.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-78e36f3b0dae.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-78e36f3b0dae.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-df0cc57e057f.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-df0cc57e057f.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-fce15c45d3fb.el7 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/fedora-fce15c45d3fb.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-2585cf9dfaad.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-2585cf9dfaad.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-78e36f3b0dae.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-78e36f3b0dae.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-df0cc57e057f.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-df0cc57e057f.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-fce15c45d3fb.el7| 4 +- redhat/self-test/data/rhel-fce15c45d3fb.fc25 | 4 +- redhat/Makefile| 38 +++-- 26 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/3] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2892#note_1746082497 https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci-tools/kernel/cki-internal-pipelines/cki- trusted-contributors/-/jobs/6016814624 is one example. Basically the self-test script creates the data files to test. With this change the script calls 'make setup-source' which now depends on 'make clean-sources' which deletes anything created (the data files to test). -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/3] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2892#note_1746039228 That's unfortunate :/ Can you point me to a specific pipeline that failed? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/3] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2892#note_1745969503 This had to be reverted. It turns out that fixing this race put a new race in which caused CKI to fail more often than not. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745521167 Indeed they are, the turned off are for other places where tools are turned off. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745480146 now I'm totally confused - the link above has libperf-6.8.0-0.rc1.20240125git6098d87eaf31.15.eln134.aarch64.rpm, is that the wrong package? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745476990 I have looked at them, and they are off for eln. As you can see from the ELN build linked above, we do not build libperf on ELN. I don't think that CKI is actually failing on libperf here for ELN. It is failing on cross compile issues. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745461956 @jmflinuxtx checking Koji, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2378291 is the latest ELN kernel build and has the `libperf` subpackage. Which build did you check that included this MR but did have the `libperf` subpackage successfully disabled? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745452056 - for tracking: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/pipeline- definition/-/issues/223 - move `--with libperf` to native tools stage: https://gitlab.com/cki- project/pipeline-definition/-/merge_requests/1879 I'm still confused why this is affecting the ELN builds, rpmbuild is called via `rpmbuild --rebuild --target ppc64le --with cross --with up --with base --without bpftool --without selftests --without ipaclones --without perf --without tools --without trace --without debug --without arm64_16k --without arm64_64k --without realtime --without zfcpdump` [[1]](https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci-tools/kernel/cki-internal- pipelines/cki-trusted-contributors/-/jobs/6000516388#L91) which does not include `--with libperf` at all, @jmflinuxtx could you take a look at the conditionals in the spec file again? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Scott Weaver on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745295177 Ah. Ok so that explains why it's not in ark yet. So we can leave it off for ELN and handle it in RHEL10 then. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745290922 @scweaver It may be, but when I emailed acme about it, he said it wasn't ready to be turned on. I am guessing it is moving too quickly and RHEL 10 will be enabled with a specific ABI? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745288040 I suppose so. I am guessing this is because we don't add --without libperf which is a new option now. Realistically libperf is turned off for ELN now though so, not sure why it is being built. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745285135 ack; so iiuc - Fedora/Rawhide pipelines should enable native tools builds, so that the tools subpackage building is handled the same way as for ELN, where it _normally_ is working correctly - somehow this MR is breaking the libperf build even for ELN, but maybe this is because it was not enabled before at all ? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Scott Weaver on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745281940 We are building the libperf package in cs9 but somehow missed porting that to ark. So we should have it enable for ELN. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745279374 When I say "turn on tools" I mean simply enabling those subpackages in Fedora. Most (excluding libperf) have always been enabled in ELN, but Fedora used a separate package to build them. Fedora is getting rid of that separate package and wishes to build the tools subpackages as part of kernel now. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745275743 I do not. with_libperf is only set for Fedora at the moment. If ELN/Rawhide want to turn it on, the would need to do so with another MR. This can be seen in the resulting builds from koji where ELN does not build libperf packages, but Fedora does. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745272834 @jmflinuxtx for Fedora, the CKI pipelines do not use native tools builds; when you say "turn on tools", do you want to enable the native tools build in the CKI pipelines, or do you expect this to work in a cross-compile setup? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745269333 @jmflinuxtx as the MR only talks about Fedora, do you expect the spec file changes to affect ELN in any way? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745264889 @dzickusrh ^ do you have an idea why the cross compiler is not correctly selected here after the changes even for ELN? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745263209 yes, this looks like a cross-compiler mixup -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745260387 I meant actual builds in koji. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2378280 for Rawhide and https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2378291 for ELN. As can be seen there, this MR does exactly what it aims to do. No build failures. CKI is the issue here, not this MR. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745249324 at what CKI pipeline are you looking from https://gitlab.com/cki- project/kernel-ark/-/pipelines?page=1=all=ark-latest? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745226469 There are, which makes no sense, as this MR is "include in release" and neither Fedora or ELN builds failed yesterday with this MR included. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745213110 looking at the failing pipelines, there are some for ELN that are now failing as well 樂: > 00:06:29 cc1: error: bad value ‘z15’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch 00:06:29 cc1: note: valid arguments to ‘-mtune=’ switch are: nocona core2 nehalem corei7 westmere sandybridge corei7-avx ivybridge core-avx-i haswell core-avx2 broadwell skylake skylake-avx512 cannonlake icelake-client rocketlake icelake-server cascadelake tigerlake cooperlake sapphirerapids emeraldrapids alderlake raptorlake meteorlake graniterapids graniterapids-d bonnell atom silvermont slm goldmont goldmont-plus tremont gracemont sierraforest grandridge knl knm intel x86-64 eden-x2 nano nano-1000 nano-2000 nano-3000 nano-x2 eden-x4 nano-x4 lujiazui k8 k8-sse3 opteron opteron-sse3 athlon64 athlon64-sse3 athlon-fx amdfam10 barcelona bdver1 bdver2 bdver3 bdver4 znver1 znver2 znver3 znver4 btver1 btver2 generic native 00:06:29 make[2]: *** [/tmp/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-6.8.0-0.rc1.615d30064886.13. test/linux-6.8.0-0.rc1.615d30064886.13.test.eln.s390x/tools/build/Makefile.bui ld:106: core.o] Error 1 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745186783 It will be needed for all other MRs after this is merged, it just was not needed before this MR. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745089468 when you say "for this MR", do you mean that this is not going to be needed for other MRs going in later, and for the Rawhide/ELN baseline builds? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
