Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749975554 I believe you are correct. Will fix it up. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749970833 @jmflinuxtx ah I think I have an idea, the spec file now has the following lines for Fedora: ``` %define with_libperf 1 %define with_tools 1 ``` with these, is it even possible to disable tools and libperf build via `--without libperf --without tools`? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749965091 I'll keep on digging... -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749916656 I do not expect that it would hit Makefile.perf for any reason. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749908405 @jmflinuxtx do you have an idea whether it is expected that the above rpmbuild command still hits Makefile.perf? ``` 00:33:18 make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:251: sub-make] Error 2 ``` -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749901619 ok, one mistake found: the Rawhide pipeline was never restarted with the change in https://gitlab.com/cki-project/pipeline- definition/-/merge_requests/1879, so the `--without --libperf` was missing in the cross-compile `build` jobs I recreated a new child pipeline for `ark_merge_request` that should pick up these changes. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749892200 checking an ELN log, the same error is present there 臘 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749878052 the first failure is 30 seconds into the build: ``` > /usr/bin/make CROSS_COMPILE=ppc64le-linux-gnu- ... vmlinux > 00:00:28 cc1: error: bad value ‘power8’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch ``` I'm a bit at a loss why this `cc1` is not the cross compiler, but the native one; the same seems (?) to work fine on ELN -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749873338 As I said above, this particular MR is include in releases because I need koji building these packages. Since pipelines now run on include in releases, this MR should be impacting others too. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749872330 aaah the builds merge `ark-latest` now 臘 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749870876 I assumed it has nothing to do with native tools as https://gitlab.com/cki- project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2912 is also impacted? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749868492 Why would we remove arches which should work fine? If we can build tools for ELN with the native_tools bit, we should be able to do the same for rawhide, no? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749868378 same for the Clang pipeline which seem to be red everywhere, @dzickusrh should we remove them as well? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749864890 This is a cross-compile issue so is not visible in Brew; if this is not something you want to keep green for Fedora/Rawhide, should we remove the ppc64le/s390x arches for the Rawhide pipelines? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749862756 To enable native tools for Rawhide similar to ELN, the only change to `.gitlab-ci.yml` is ```yaml .trigger_rawhide: variables: native_tools: 'true' ``` As the Rawhide non-debug pipelines are the only ones affected by this, the above issue needs to be fixed first to be able to validate that `native_tools: true` is indeed also working for Rawhide. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749862624 This MR is "include in release" so it is being tested in all pipelines. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749852844 whatever is failing the Rawhide pipeline in this MR is also failing e.g. https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2912, so this particular breakage seems to be caused by something that was merged before. ppc64le build from this MR - https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci- tools/kernel/cki-internal-pipelines/cki-trusted- contributors/-/jobs/6052447795#L105: > 00:00:24 + /usr/bin/make CROSS_COMPILE=ppc64le-linux-gnu- -s HOSTCFLAGS= HOSTLDFLAGS= ARCH=powerpc 'KCFLAGS= ' WITH_GCOV=0 -j24 vmlinux > 00:00:28 cc1: error: bad value ‘power8’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch ppc64le build from !2912 - https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci- tools/kernel/cki-internal-pipelines/cki-trusted- contributors/-/jobs/6033136409#L106: > 00:00:22 + /usr/bin/make CROSS_COMPILE=ppc64le-linux-gnu- -s HOSTCFLAGS= HOSTLDFLAGS= ARCH=powerpc 'KCFLAGS= ' WITH_GCOV=0 -j24 vmlinux > 00:00:26 cc1: error: bad value ‘power8’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745521167 Indeed they are, the turned off are for other places where tools are turned off. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745480146 now I'm totally confused - the link above has libperf-6.8.0-0.rc1.20240125git6098d87eaf31.15.eln134.aarch64.rpm, is that the wrong package? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745476990 I have looked at them, and they are off for eln. As you can see from the ELN build linked above, we do not build libperf on ELN. I don't think that CKI is actually failing on libperf here for ELN. It is failing on cross compile issues. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745461956 @jmflinuxtx checking Koji, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2378291 is the latest ELN kernel build and has the `libperf` subpackage. Which build did you check that included this MR but did have the `libperf` subpackage successfully disabled? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745452056 - for tracking: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/pipeline- definition/-/issues/223 - move `--with libperf` to native tools stage: https://gitlab.com/cki- project/pipeline-definition/-/merge_requests/1879 I'm still confused why this is affecting the ELN builds, rpmbuild is called via `rpmbuild --rebuild --target ppc64le --with cross --with up --with base --without bpftool --without selftests --without ipaclones --without perf --without tools --without trace --without debug --without arm64_16k --without arm64_64k --without realtime --without zfcpdump` [[1]](https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci-tools/kernel/cki-internal- pipelines/cki-trusted-contributors/-/jobs/6000516388#L91) which does not include `--with libperf` at all, @jmflinuxtx could you take a look at the conditionals in the spec file again? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Scott Weaver on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745295177 Ah. Ok so that explains why it's not in ark yet. So we can leave it off for ELN and handle it in RHEL10 then. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745290922 @scweaver It may be, but when I emailed acme about it, he said it wasn't ready to be turned on. I am guessing it is moving too quickly and RHEL 10 will be enabled with a specific ABI? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745288040 I suppose so. I am guessing this is because we don't add --without libperf which is a new option now. Realistically libperf is turned off for ELN now though so, not sure why it is being built. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745285135 ack; so iiuc - Fedora/Rawhide pipelines should enable native tools builds, so that the tools subpackage building is handled the same way as for ELN, where it _normally_ is working correctly - somehow this MR is breaking the libperf build even for ELN, but maybe this is because it was not enabled before at all ? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Scott Weaver on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745281940 We are building the libperf package in cs9 but somehow missed porting that to ark. So we should have it enable for ELN. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745279374 When I say "turn on tools" I mean simply enabling those subpackages in Fedora. Most (excluding libperf) have always been enabled in ELN, but Fedora used a separate package to build them. Fedora is getting rid of that separate package and wishes to build the tools subpackages as part of kernel now. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745275743 I do not. with_libperf is only set for Fedora at the moment. If ELN/Rawhide want to turn it on, the would need to do so with another MR. This can be seen in the resulting builds from koji where ELN does not build libperf packages, but Fedora does. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745272834 @jmflinuxtx for Fedora, the CKI pipelines do not use native tools builds; when you say "turn on tools", do you want to enable the native tools build in the CKI pipelines, or do you expect this to work in a cross-compile setup? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745269333 @jmflinuxtx as the MR only talks about Fedora, do you expect the spec file changes to affect ELN in any way? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745264889 @dzickusrh ^ do you have an idea why the cross compiler is not correctly selected here after the changes even for ELN? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745263209 yes, this looks like a cross-compiler mixup -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745260387 I meant actual builds in koji. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2378280 for Rawhide and https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2378291 for ELN. As can be seen there, this MR does exactly what it aims to do. No build failures. CKI is the issue here, not this MR. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745249324 at what CKI pipeline are you looking from https://gitlab.com/cki- project/kernel-ark/-/pipelines?page=1=all=ark-latest? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745226469 There are, which makes no sense, as this MR is "include in release" and neither Fedora or ELN builds failed yesterday with this MR included. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745213110 looking at the failing pipelines, there are some for ELN that are now failing as well 樂: > 00:06:29 cc1: error: bad value ‘z15’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch 00:06:29 cc1: note: valid arguments to ‘-mtune=’ switch are: nocona core2 nehalem corei7 westmere sandybridge corei7-avx ivybridge core-avx-i haswell core-avx2 broadwell skylake skylake-avx512 cannonlake icelake-client rocketlake icelake-server cascadelake tigerlake cooperlake sapphirerapids emeraldrapids alderlake raptorlake meteorlake graniterapids graniterapids-d bonnell atom silvermont slm goldmont goldmont-plus tremont gracemont sierraforest grandridge knl knm intel x86-64 eden-x2 nano nano-1000 nano-2000 nano-3000 nano-x2 eden-x4 nano-x4 lujiazui k8 k8-sse3 opteron opteron-sse3 athlon64 athlon64-sse3 athlon-fx amdfam10 barcelona bdver1 bdver2 bdver3 bdver4 znver1 znver2 znver3 znver4 btver1 btver2 generic native 00:06:29 make[2]: *** [/tmp/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-6.8.0-0.rc1.615d30064886.13. test/linux-6.8.0-0.rc1.615d30064886.13.test.eln.s390x/tools/build/Makefile.bui ld:106: core.o] Error 1 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745186783 It will be needed for all other MRs after this is merged, it just was not needed before this MR. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1745089468 when you say "for this MR", do you mean that this is not going to be needed for other MRs going in later, and for the Rawhide/ELN baseline builds? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1741124750 @mh21_rh It appears we might need to add --without libperf to the cki builds for this MR. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1740885976 Possibly, but to be honest the versioning is not exactly interesting either. As you can see from the commit 9910a74d6ebf6 there isn't a whole lot of reason for anyone to care about the bpftool version number. It is pulled from the kernel tree, but with a dynamically linked libbpf we may well have a completely incorrect version number. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907 When kernel-tools was split out to a separate package in Fedora, it was due to several factors. Most of those issues have been mitigated in other ways, and there are advantages to building tools with the kernel build. Let's turn on tools for Fedora. To do so, we need to add the libperf packages, but this enables them for Fedora only. It is worth noting that the Fedora package for bpftool will retain the upstream kernel versioning. This is because the bpftool versioning scheme is incompatible with the stable Fedora process. --- redhat/kernel.spec.template | 81 +++- 1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
