[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
test in Bionic. Only Groovy and OEM-5.6 are affected.
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
[Test]
Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed case the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
This bug was fixed in the package linux-oem-5.6 - 5.6.0-1053.57 --- linux-oem-5.6 (5.6.0-1053.57) focal; urgency=medium * focal/linux-oem-5.6: 5.6.0-1053.57 -proposed tracker (LP: #1921042) * Packaging resync (LP: #1786013) - update dkms package versions * LRMv4: switch to signing nvidia modules via the Ubuntu Modules signing key (LP: #1918134) - [Packaging] sync dkms-build et al from LRMv4 * CVE-2021-29154 - SAUCE: bpf, x86: Validate computation of branch displacements for x86-64 - SAUCE: bpf, x86: Validate computation of branch displacements for x86-32 * xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub- cases (LP: #1909647) - selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in xfrm_policy.sh * ip_defrag.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed with exit code 255 on F-oem-5.6 (LP: #1919147) - selftests: net: ip_defrag: modprobe missing nf_defrag_ipv6 support * l2tp.sh from net in ubuntu_kernel_selftests cause dmesg flooded with "unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 1" on F-OEM-5.6 (LP: #1919277) - l2tp: remove skb_dst_set() from l2tp_xmit_skb() * CVE-2020-0466 - epoll: Keep a reference on files added to the check list - do_epoll_ctl(): clean the failure exits up a bit - fix regression in "epoll: Keep a reference on files added to the check list" * CVE-2021-3178 - nfsd4: readdirplus shouldn't return parent of export * CVE-2020-25285 - mm/hugetlb: fix a race between hugetlb sysctl handlers * CVE-020-10781 - Revert "zram: convert remaining CLASS_ATTR() to CLASS_ATTR_RO()" * CVE-2020-14351 - perf/core: Fix race in the perf_mmap_close() function * CVE-2020-25669 - Input: sunkbd - avoid use-after-free in teardown paths * CVE-2020-14390 - fbcon: remove soft scrollback code * CVE-2021-3411 - x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe to detect INT3 padding correctly * CVE-2020-0423 - binder: fix UAF when releasing todo list * CVE-2020-27830 - speakup: Reject setting the speakup line discipline outside of speakup * CVE-2020-0465 - HID: core: Correctly handle ReportSize being zero - HID: core: Sanitize event code and type when mapping input * CVE-2020-25645 - geneve: add transport ports in route lookup for geneve * CVE-2021-20194 - bpf, cgroup: Fix optlen WARN_ON_ONCE toctou - bpf, cgroup: Fix problematic bounds check * CVE-2020-36158 - mwifiex: Fix possible buffer overflows in mwifiex_cmd_802_11_ad_hoc_start -- Stefan Bader Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:43:44 +0200 ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-0423 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-0465 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-0466 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-14351 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-14390 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-25285 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-25645 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-25669 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-27830 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-36158 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-20194 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-29154 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-3178 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-3411 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647 Title: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: In Progress Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Bionic: Invalid Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic: Invalid Status in linux source package in Focal: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal: Fix Released Status in linux source package in Groovy: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy: Invalid Status in linux source package in Hirsute: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute: Invalid Bug description: [Impact] Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall result is still "PASS" $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh # PASS: policy before exception matches # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.8.0-49.55 --- linux (5.8.0-49.55) groovy; urgency=medium * groovy/linux: 5.8.0-49.55 -proposed tracker (LP: #1921053) * selftests: bpf verifier fails after sanitize_ptr_alu fixes (LP: #1920995) - bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic - bpf: Add sanity check for upper ptr_limit - bpf, selftests: Fix up some test_verifier cases for unprivileged * Packaging resync (LP: #1786013) - update dkms package versions * improper memcg accounting causes NULL pointer derefs (LP: #1918668) - SAUCE: Revert "mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining" * kernel: Enable CONFIG_BPF_LSM on Ubuntu (LP: #1905975) - [Config] Enable CONFIG_BPF_LSM * Groovy update: upstream stable patchset 2021-03-10 (LP: #1918516) - gpio: mvebu: fix pwm .get_state period calculation - HID: wacom: Correct NULL dereference on AES pen proximity - media: v4l2-subdev.h: BIT() is not available in userspace - RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Fix network_hdr_type reported in WC - kernel/io_uring: cancel io_uring before task works - io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock - objtool: Don't fail on missing symbol table - mm/page_alloc: add a missing mm_page_alloc_zone_locked() tracepoint - mm: fix a race on nr_swap_pages - tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions - iwlwifi: provide gso_type to GSO packets - tty: avoid using vfs_iocb_iter_write() for redirected console writes - ACPI: sysfs: Prefer "compatible" modalias - kernel: kexec: remove the lock operation of system_transition_mutex - ALSA: hda/realtek: Enable headset of ASUS B1400CEPE with ALC256 - ALSA: hda/via: Apply the workaround generically for Clevo machines - parisc: Enable -mlong-calls gcc option by default when !CONFIG_MODULES - media: cec: add stm32 driver - media: hantro: Fix reset_raw_fmt initialization - media: rc: fix timeout handling after switch to microsecond durations - media: rc: ite-cir: fix min_timeout calculation - media: rc: ensure that uevent can be read directly after rc device register - ARM: dts: tbs2910: rename MMC node aliases - ARM: dts: ux500: Reserve memory carveouts - ARM: dts: imx6qdl-gw52xx: fix duplicate regulator naming - wext: fix NULL-ptr-dereference with cfg80211's lack of commit() - ASoC: AMD Renoir - refine DMI entries for some Lenovo products - drm/i915: Always flush the active worker before returning from the wait - drm/i915/gt: Always try to reserve GGTT address 0x0 - drivers/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Reject format modifiers for cursor planes - net: usb: qmi_wwan: added support for Thales Cinterion PLSx3 modem family - s390: uv: Fix sysfs max number of VCPUs reporting - s390/vfio-ap: No need to disable IRQ after queue reset - PM: hibernate: flush swap writer after marking - x86/entry: Emit a symbol for register restoring thunk - efi/apple-properties: Reinstate support for boolean properties - drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs - drivers: soc: atmel: add null entry at the end of at91_soc_allowed_list[] - btrfs: fix possible free space tree corruption with online conversion - KVM: x86/pmu: Fix HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES event pseudo-encoding in intel_arch_events[] - KVM: x86/pmu: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in intel_pmu_refresh() - KVM: nVMX: Sync unsync'd vmcs02 state to vmcs12 on migration - KVM: x86: get smi pending status correctly - KVM: Forbid the use of tagged userspace addresses for memslots - xen: Fix XenStore initialisation for XS_LOCAL - leds: trigger: fix potential deadlock with libata - arm64: dts: broadcom: Fix USB DMA address translation for Stingray - mt7601u: fix kernel crash unplugging the device - mt7601u: fix rx buffer refcounting - iwlwifi: Fix IWL_SUBDEVICE_NO_160 macro to use the correct bit. - drm/i915/gt: Clear CACHE_MODE prior to clearing residuals - drm/i915/pmu: Don't grab wakeref when enabling events - net/mlx5e: Fix IPSEC stats - ARM: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: fix pwms for lcd-backlight - drm/nouveau/svm: fail NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT ioctl on unsupported devices - drm/i915: Check for all subplatform bits - drm/i915/selftest: Fix potential memory leak - uapi: fix big endian definition of ipv6_rpl_sr_hdr - KVM: Documentation: Fix spec for KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM - tee: optee: replace might_sleep with cond_resched - xen-blkfront: allow discard-* nodes to be optional - clk: mmp2: fix build without CONFIG_PM - clk: qcom: gcc-sm250: Use floor ops for sdcc clks - ARM: imx: build suspend-imx6.S with arm instruction set - ARM: zImage: atags_to_fdt: Fix node names on added root nodes - netfilter: nft_dynset: add timeout extension to template - Revert "RDMA/mlx5: Fix devlink deadlock on net namespace deletion" - xfrm: Fix oops in
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
focal' to 'verification-done-focal'. If the problem still exists, change
the tag 'verification-needed-focal' to 'verification-failed-focal'.
If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
test in Bionic. Only Groovy and OEM-5.6 are affected.
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
[Test]
Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed case the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
This test fails on Groovy as expected now:
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in
ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
# PASS: policies inserted in random order
not ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh # exit=1
** Tags removed: verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
test in Bionic. Only Groovy and OEM-5.6 are affected.
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
[Test]
Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed case the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
groovy' to 'verification-done-groovy'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-groovy' to 'verification-failed-
groovy'.
If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: verification-needed-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
test in Bionic. Only Groovy and OEM-5.6 are affected.
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
[Test]
Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed case the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
test in Bionic. Only Groovy and OEM-5.6 are affected.
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
[Test]
Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed case the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the passed
test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
+ Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
+ test in Bionic. Only Groovy and OEM-5.6 are affected.
+
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
- Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
- test in Bionic.
-
[Test]
- Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed cases the final result
will not be 0.
+ Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed case the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
** Tags added: groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Description changed:
- There are failed cases in the xfrm_policy.sh test, but the overall result is
PASS
+ [Impact]
+ Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
- # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
- # PASS: policy before exception matches
- # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
- # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
- # PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
- # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
- # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
- # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
- # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
- # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
- # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
- # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
- # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
- # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
- # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
- # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
- # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
- # PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
- ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
+ # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
+ # PASS: policy before exception matches
+ # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
+ # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
+ # PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
+ # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
+ # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
+ # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
+ # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
+ # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
+ # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
+ # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
+ # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
+ # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
+ # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
+ # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
+ # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
+ # PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
+ ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the passed
test case after the failed one.
+
+ [Fix]
+ * f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
+
+ This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
+
+ Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
+ test in Bionic.
+
+ [Test]
+ Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed cases the final result
will not be 0.
+
+ [Regression Potential]
+ This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/f6e9ceb7a7fc321a31a9dde93a99b7b4b016a3b3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
[Impact]
Even with failed cases reported in the xfrm_policy.sh test, the overall
result is still "PASS"
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
[Fix]
* f6e9ceb7a7fc32 (" selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in
xfrm_policy.sh")
This patch can be cherry-picked into all of the affected kernels.
Focal kernel got this patch via stable update, and we don't have this
test in Bionic.
[Test]
Run the xfrm_policy.sh test, if there is any failed cases the final result
will not be 0.
[Regression Potential]
This change is just for testing tools, it's unlikely to affect real kernel
functionality. However it's expected to generate failures in our test report as
it's reflecting the real test result.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Incomplete => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647 Title: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: In Progress Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Bionic: Invalid Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic: Invalid Status in linux source package in Focal: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal: In Progress Status in linux source package in Groovy: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy: Invalid Status in linux source package in Hirsute: Fix Released Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute: Invalid Bug description: There are failed cases in the xfrm_policy.sh test, but the overall result is PASS $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh # PASS: policy before exception matches # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: policies with repeated htresh change ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh $ echo $? 0 This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local variable, and it looks like it will override the one in check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the passed test case after the failed one. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Also affects: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647 Title: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: In Progress Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Bionic: New Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic: Invalid Status in linux source package in Focal: New Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal: New Status in linux source package in Groovy: New Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy: Invalid Status in linux source package in Hirsute: New Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute: Invalid Bug description: There are failed cases in the xfrm_policy.sh test, but the overall result is PASS $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh # PASS: policy before exception matches # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: policies with repeated htresh change ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh $ echo $? 0 This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local variable, and it looks like it will override the one in check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the passed test case after the failed one. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1909647] Re: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647 Title: xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed sub-cases Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: In Progress Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux source package in Bionic: New Status in linux source package in Focal: New Status in linux source package in Groovy: New Status in linux source package in Hirsute: New Bug description: There are failed cases in the xfrm_policy.sh test, but the overall result is PASS $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh # PASS: policy before exception matches # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) # PASS: policies with repeated htresh change ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh $ echo $? 0 This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local variable, and it looks like it will override the one in check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the passed test case after the failed one. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
