Public bug reported:

Hello,

Upstream is dicussing the removal of mandatory locks. To actually do
this at some point distros will need to start disabling
CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING. It seems our kernel still defaults to
CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING=y. If feasible I'd like to propose
disabling CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING in the upcoming kernel releases.
>From the thread it seems that RHEL 8 and Fedora already disable
mandatory locks:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c65c4e42-9661-1321-eaf8-61b1d6f89...@redhat.com

Thanks!
Christian

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940392

Title:
  fs: removing mandatory locks

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hello,

  Upstream is dicussing the removal of mandatory locks. To actually do
  this at some point distros will need to start disabling
  CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING. It seems our kernel still defaults to
  CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING=y. If feasible I'd like to propose
  disabling CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING in the upcoming kernel
  releases. From the thread it seems that RHEL 8 and Fedora already
  disable mandatory locks:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c65c4e42-9661-1321-eaf8-61b1d6f89...@redhat.com

  Thanks!
  Christian

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1940392/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to