[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2024-02-29 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-mtk/5.15.0-1030.34
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-mtk' to 'verification-done-jammy-
linux-mtk'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-jammy-linux-mtk' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-mtk'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-mtk-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-mtk

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-12-04 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-azure-
fips/5.15.0-1053.61+fips1 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please
test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure-fips' to
'verification-done-jammy-linux-azure-fips'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure-fips' to
'verification-failed-jammy-linux-azure-fips'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-azure-fips-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure-fips

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-11-15 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-nvidia-
tegra-5.15/5.15.0-1019.19~20.04.1 kernel in -proposed solves the
problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If
the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal-linux-
nvidia-tegra-5.15' to 'verification-done-focal-linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15'.
If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal-
linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15' to 'verification-failed-focal-linux-nvidia-
tegra-5.15'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-focal-linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15-v2 
verification-needed-focal-linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-11-10 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-nvidia-tegra-
igx/5.15.0-1006.6 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test
the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-
igx' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx'. If the problem
still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-
tegra-igx' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-11-09 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-xilinx-
zynqmp/5.15.0-1025.29 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please
test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp'
to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp'. If the problem still
exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp'
to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-11-08 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-gcp-tcpx/5.15.0-1002.2
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-focal-linux-gcp-tcpx' to 'verification-done-
focal-linux-gcp-tcpx'. If the problem still exists, change the tag
'verification-needed-focal-linux-gcp-tcpx' to 'verification-failed-
focal-linux-gcp-tcpx'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-focal-linux-gcp-tcpx-v2 
verification-needed-focal-linux-gcp-tcpx

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-11-01 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-nvidia-
tegra/5.15.0-1019.19 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test
the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra' to
'verification-done-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra'. If the problem still
exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra' to
'verification-failed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-31 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-
oracle-6.2/6.2.0-1015.15~22.04.1 kernel in -proposed solves the problem.
Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the
problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-
oracle-6.2' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-oracle-6.2'. If the
problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-
oracle-6.2' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-oracle-6.2'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-oracle-6.2-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-oracle-6.2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.4.0-166.183

---
linux (5.4.0-166.183) focal; urgency=medium

  * focal/linux: 5.4.0-166.183 -proposed tracker (LP: #2038010)

  * Use new annotations model (LP: #2019000)
- [Packaging] new annotations model infrastructure
- [Packaging] config-check: Handle new annotations format 4
- [Packaging] rules: Use old-kernelconfig for old configs
- [Config] sanitize annotations
- [Config] import generated configs into annotation file
- [Packaging] kernelconfig: add i386 as supported arch
- [Config] Remove all old configs files

  * Packaging resync (LP: #1786013)
- [Packaging] update helper scripts
- [Packaging] update annotations scripts

  * fix typo in config-checks invocation (LP: #2020413)
- [Packaging] fix typo when calling the old config-check
- [Packaging] fix typo in 4-checks.mk

  * support python < 3.9 with annotations (LP: #2020531)
- [Packaging] kconfig/annotations.py: support older way of merging dicts

  * CVE-2023-42756
- netfilter: ipset: Fix race between IPSET_CMD_CREATE and IPSET_CMD_SWAP

  * CVE-2023-4623
- net/sched: sch_hfsc: Ensure inner classes have fsc curve

  * Focal update: v5.4.252 upstream stable release (LP: #2036240)
- ia64/cpu: Switch to arch_cpu_finalize_init()
- m68k/cpu: Switch to arch_cpu_finalize_init()
- mips/cpu: Switch to arch_cpu_finalize_init()
- sh/cpu: Switch to arch_cpu_finalize_init()
- x86/cpufeatures: Add SEV-ES CPU feature
- x86/cpu: Add VM page flush MSR availablility as a CPUID feature
- x86/cpufeatures: Assign dedicated feature word for CPUID_0x801F[EAX]
- tools headers cpufeatures: Sync with the kernel sources
- x86/cpu, kvm: Add support for CPUID_8021_EAX
- Linux 5.4.252
- Upstream stable to v5.4.252

  * CVE-2023-42755
- net/sched: Retire rsvp classifier
- [Config] remove NET_CLS_RSVP and NET_CLS_RSVP6

  * CVE-2023-42753
- netfilter: ipset: add the missing IP_SET_HASH_WITH_NET0 macro for
  ip_set_hash_netportnet.c

  * CVE-2023-34319
- xen/netback: Fix buffer overrun triggered by unusual packet

  * CVE-2023-4921
- net: sched: sch_qfq: Fix UAF in qfq_dequeue()

  * CVE-2023-42752
- igmp: limit igmpv3_newpack() packet size to IP_MAX_MTU

  * Avoid address overwrite in kernel_connect (LP: #2035163)
- net: Avoid address overwrite in kernel_connect

  * [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3
(LP: #2034745)
- x86/fpu: Set X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE feature after enabling OSXSAVE in CR4

  * CVE-2023-4881
- netfilter: nftables: exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write

  * CVE-2023-4622
- af_unix: Fix null-ptr-deref in unix_stream_sendpage().

  * Focal update: v5.4.251 upstream stable release (LP: #2034918)
- x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead()
- video: imsttfb: check for ioremap() failures
- fbdev: imsttfb: Fix use after free bug in imsttfb_probe
- HID: wacom: Use ktime_t rather than int when dealing with timestamps
- drm/i915: Initialise outparam for error return from wait_for_register
- scripts/tags.sh: Resolve gtags empty index generation
- drm/amdgpu: Validate VM ioctl flags.
- bgmac: fix *initial* chip reset to support BCM5358
- x86/resctrl: Use is_closid_match() in more places
- x86/resctrl: Only show tasks' pid in current pid namespace
- md/raid10: check slab-out-of-bounds in md_bitmap_get_counter
- md/raid10: fix overflow of md/safe_mode_delay
- md/raid10: fix wrong setting of max_corr_read_errors
- md/raid10: fix null-ptr-deref of mreplace in raid10_sync_request
- md/raid10: fix io loss while replacement replace rdev
- irqchip/jcore-aic: Kill use of irq_create_strict_mappings()
- irqchip/jcore-aic: Fix missing allocation of IRQ descriptors
- tracing/timer: Add missing hrtimer modes to decode_hrtimer_mode().
- clocksource/drivers/cadence-ttc: Use ttc driver as platform driver
- clocksource/drivers/cadence-ttc: Fix memory leak in ttc_timer_probe
- PM: domains: fix integer overflow issues in genpd_parse_state()
- powercap: RAPL: Fix CONFIG_IOSF_MBI dependency
- ARM: 9303/1: kprobes: avoid missing-declaration warnings
- evm: Complete description of evm_inode_setattr()
- pstore/ram: Add check for kstrdup
- ima: Fix build warnings
- wifi: ath9k: fix AR9003 mac hardware hang check register offset 
calculation
- wifi: ath9k: avoid referencing uninit memory in ath9k_wmi_ctrl_rx
- samples/bpf: Fix buffer overflow in tcp_basertt
- spi: spi-geni-qcom: Correct CS_TOGGLE bit in SPI_TRANS_CFG
- wifi: mwifiex: Fix the size of a memory allocation in
  mwifiex_ret_802_11_scan()
- nfc: constify several pointers to u8, char and sk_buff
- nfc: llcp: fix possible use of uninitialized variable in
  nfc_llcp_send_connect()
- regulator: core: Fix more error checking for 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-
bluefield/5.15.0-1029.31 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please
test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield' to
'verification-done-jammy-linux-bluefield'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield' to
'verification-failed-jammy-linux-bluefield'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-bluefield-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-intel-
iotg/5.15.0-1044.50 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test
the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg' to
'verification-done-jammy-linux-intel-iotg'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg' to
'verification-failed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-intel-iot-
realtime/5.15.0-1042.44 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please
test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is
solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iot-
realtime' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-intel-iot-realtime'. If the
problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-
intel-iot-realtime' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-intel-iot-
realtime'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-intel-iot-realtime-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iot-realtime

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-
starfive-6.2/6.2.0-1008.9~22.04.1 kernel in -proposed solves the
problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If
the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-
starfive-6.2' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-starfive-6.2'. If the
problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-
starfive-6.2' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-starfive-6.2'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-starfive-6.2-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-starfive-6.2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.15.0-88.98

---
linux (5.15.0-88.98) jammy; urgency=medium

  * jammy/linux: 5.15.0-88.98 -proposed tracker (LP: #2038055)

  * CVE-2023-4244
- netfilter: nf_tables: don't skip expired elements during walk
- netfilter: nf_tables: adapt set backend to use GC transaction API
- netfilter: nft_set_hash: mark set element as dead when deleting from 
packet
  path
- netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction API to avoid race with control plane
- netfilter: nf_tables: remove busy mark and gc batch API
- netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired
- netfilter: nf_tables: fix kdoc warnings after gc rework
- netfilter: nf_tables: fix GC transaction races with netns and netlink 
event
  exit path
- netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction race with netns dismantle
- netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction race with abort path
- netfilter: nf_tables: use correct lock to protect gc_list
- netfilter: nf_tables: defer gc run if previous batch is still pending
- netfilter: nft_dynset: disallow object maps
- netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip sync GC for new elements in this 
transaction

  * CVE-2023-42756
- netfilter: ipset: Fix race between IPSET_CMD_CREATE and IPSET_CMD_SWAP

  * CVE-2023-4623
- net/sched: sch_hfsc: Ensure inner classes have fsc curve

  * PCI BARs larger than 128GB are disabled (LP: #2037403)
- PCI: Support BAR sizes up to 8TB

  * Fix unstable audio at low levels on Thinkpad P1G4 (LP: #2037077)
- ALSA: hda/realtek - ALC287 I2S speaker platform support

  * Check for changes relevant for security certifications (LP: #1945989)
- [Packaging] Add a new fips-checks script

  * Jammy update: v5.15.126 upstream stable release (LP: #2037593)
- io_uring: gate iowait schedule on having pending requests
- perf: Fix function pointer case
- net/mlx5: Free irqs only on shutdown callback
- arm64: errata: Add workaround for TSB flush failures
- arm64: errata: Add detection for TRBE write to out-of-range
- [Config] updateconfigs for ARM64_ERRATUM_ and
  ARM64_WORKAROUND_TSB_FLUSH_FAILURE
- iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Work around MMU-600 erratum 1076982
- iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Document MMU-700 erratum 2812531
- iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add explicit feature for nesting
- iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Document nesting-related errata
- arm64: dts: imx8mn-var-som: add missing pull-up for onboard PHY reset 
pinmux
- word-at-a-time: use the same return type for has_zero regardless of
  endianness
- KVM: s390: fix sthyi error handling
- wifi: cfg80211: Fix return value in scan logic
- net/mlx5: DR, fix memory leak in mlx5dr_cmd_create_reformat_ctx
- net/mlx5e: fix return value check in mlx5e_ipsec_remove_trailer()
- bpf: Add length check for SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_REQ_MAP_FD parsing
- rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length
- net: dsa: fix value check in bcm_sf2_sw_probe()
- perf test uprobe_from_different_cu: Skip if there is no gcc
- net: sched: cls_u32: Fix match key mis-addressing
- mISDN: hfcpci: Fix potential deadlock on >lock
- qed: Fix kernel-doc warnings
- qed: Fix scheduling in a tasklet while getting stats
- net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_max_pacing_rate
- net: add missing READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvlowat) annotation
- net: add missing READ_ONCE(sk->sk_sndbuf) annotation
- net: add missing READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) annotation
- net: add missing data-race annotations around sk->sk_peek_off
- net: add missing data-race annotation for sk_ll_usec
- net/sched: taprio: Limit TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_SCHED_CYCLE_TIME to INT_MAX.
- bpf, cpumap: Handle skb as well when clean up ptr_ring
- bpf: sockmap: Remove preempt_disable in sock_map_sk_acquire
- net: ll_temac: Switch to use dev_err_probe() helper
- net: ll_temac: fix error checking of irq_of_parse_and_map()
- net: korina: handle clk prepare error in korina_probe()
- net: netsec: Ignore 'phy-mode' on SynQuacer in DT mode
- net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN
- s390/qeth: Don't call dev_close/dev_open (DOWN/UP)
- ip6mr: Fix skb_under_panic in ip6mr_cache_report()
- vxlan: Fix nexthop hash size
- net/mlx5: fs_core: Make find_closest_ft more generic
- net/mlx5: fs_core: Skip the FTs in the same FS_TYPE_PRIO_CHAINS fs_prio
- prestera: fix fallback to previous version on same major version
- tcp_metrics: fix addr_same() helper
- tcp_metrics: annotate data-races around tm->tcpm_stamp
- tcp_metrics: annotate data-races around tm->tcpm_lock
- tcp_metrics: annotate data-races around tm->tcpm_vals[]
- tcp_metrics: annotate data-races around tm->tcpm_net
- tcp_metrics: fix data-race in tcpm_suck_dst() vs fastopen
- scsi: zfcp: Defer fc_rport blocking until after ADISC response
- scsi: storvsc: Limit max_sectors for 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-iot/5.4.0-1025.26
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-focal-linux-iot' to 'verification-done-focal-
linux-iot'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-focal-linux-iot' to 'verification-failed-focal-linux-iot'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-focal-linux-iot-v2 
verification-needed-focal-linux-iot

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-gkeop/5.15.0-1032.38
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-gkeop' to 'verification-done-jammy-
linux-gkeop'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-jammy-linux-gkeop' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-gkeop'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-gkeop-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-gkeop

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-raspi/5.15.0-1042.45
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-raspi' to 'verification-done-jammy-
linux-raspi'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-jammy-linux-raspi' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-raspi'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-raspi-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-raspi

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-riscv/6.2.0-36.37.1
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-lunar-linux-riscv' to 'verification-done-lunar-
linux-riscv'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-lunar-linux-riscv' to 'verification-failed-lunar-linux-riscv'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-lunar-linux-riscv-v2 
verification-needed-lunar-linux-riscv

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 6.2.0-36.37

---
linux (6.2.0-36.37) lunar; urgency=medium

  * lunar/linux: 6.2.0-36.37 -proposed tracker (LP: #2038076)

  * Regression for ubuntu_bpf test build caused by upstream bdeeed3498c7
(LP: #2035181)
- selftests/bpf: fix static assert compilation issue for test_cls_*.c

  * CVE-2023-4244
- netfilter: nf_tables: don't skip expired elements during walk
- netfilter: nf_tables: adapt set backend to use GC transaction API
- netfilter: nft_set_hash: mark set element as dead when deleting from 
packet
  path
- netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction API to avoid race with control plane
- netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired
- netfilter: nf_tables: fix kdoc warnings after gc rework
- netfilter: nf_tables: fix GC transaction races with netns and netlink 
event
  exit path
- netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction race with netns dismantle
- netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction race with abort path
- netfilter: nf_tables: use correct lock to protect gc_list
- netfilter: nf_tables: defer gc run if previous batch is still pending
- netfilter: nft_dynset: disallow object maps
- netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip sync GC for new elements in this 
transaction

  * CVE-2023-4563
- netfilter: nf_tables: remove busy mark and gc batch API

  * CVE-2023-42756
- netfilter: ipset: Fix race between IPSET_CMD_CREATE and IPSET_CMD_SWAP

  * CVE-2023-4623
- net/sched: sch_hfsc: Ensure inner classes have fsc curve

  * Fix unstable audio at low levels on Thinkpad P1G4 (LP: #2037077)
- ALSA: hda/realtek - ALC287 I2S speaker platform support

  * Lunar update: upstream stable patchset 2023-09-21 (LP: #2037005)
- Upstream stable to v6.1.41, v6.4.6
- io_uring: treat -EAGAIN for REQ_F_NOWAIT as final for io-wq
- ALSA: hda/realtek - remove 3k pull low procedure
- ALSA: hda/realtek: Add quirk for Clevo NS70AU
- ALSA: hda/realtek: Enable Mute LED on HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx
- maple_tree: set the node limit when creating a new root node
- maple_tree: fix node allocation testing on 32 bit
- keys: Fix linking a duplicate key to a keyring's assoc_array
- perf probe: Add test for regression introduced by switch to
  die_get_decl_file()
- btrfs: fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after 
abort
- fuse: revalidate: don't invalidate if interrupted
- fuse: Apply flags2 only when userspace set the FUSE_INIT_EXT
- btrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand
- btrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocks
- fuse: ioctl: translate ENOSYS in outarg
- btrfs: fix race between balance and cancel/pause
- selftests: tc: set timeout to 15 minutes
- selftests: tc: add 'ct' action kconfig dep
- regmap: Drop initial version of maximum transfer length fixes
- of: Preserve "of-display" device name for compatibility
- regmap: Account for register length in SMBus I/O limits
- arm64/fpsimd: Ensure SME storage is allocated after SVE VL changes
- can: mcp251xfd: __mcp251xfd_chip_set_mode(): increase poll timeout
- can: bcm: Fix UAF in bcm_proc_show()
- can: gs_usb: gs_can_open(): improve error handling
- selftests: tc: add ConnTrack procfs kconfig
- dma-buf/dma-resv: Stop leaking on krealloc() failure
- drm/amdgpu/vkms: relax timer deactivation by hrtimer_try_to_cancel
- drm/amdgpu/pm: make gfxclock consistent for sienna cichlid
- drm/amdgpu/pm: make mclk consistent for smu 13.0.7
- drm/client: Fix memory leak in drm_client_target_cloned
- drm/client: Fix memory leak in drm_client_modeset_probe
- drm/amd/display: only accept async flips for fast updates
- drm/amd/display: Disable MPC split by default on special asic
- drm/amd/display: check TG is non-null before checking if enabled
- drm/amd/display: Keep PHY active for DP displays on DCN31
- ASoC: fsl_sai: Disable bit clock with transmitter
- ASoC: fsl_sai: Revert "ASoC: fsl_sai: Enable MCTL_MCLK_EN bit for master
  mode"
- ASoC: tegra: Fix ADX byte map
- ASoC: rt5640: Fix sleep in atomic context
- ASoC: cs42l51: fix driver to properly autoload with automatic module 
loading
- ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix missing clsh ctrl error handling
- ASoC: codecs: wcd-mbhc-v2: fix resource leaks on component remove
- ASoC: qdsp6: audioreach: fix topology probe deferral
- ASoC: tegra: Fix AMX byte map
- ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix resource leaks on component remove
- ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix missing mbhc init error handling
- ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: fix resource leaks on component remove
- ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix codec initialisation race
- ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix soundwire initialisation race
- ext4: correct inline offset when handling xattrs in inode body
- drm/radeon: Fix 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-oracle/6.2.0-1015.15
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-lunar-linux-oracle' to 'verification-done-
lunar-linux-oracle'. If the problem still exists, change the tag
'verification-needed-lunar-linux-oracle' to 'verification-failed-lunar-
linux-oracle'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-lunar-linux-oracle-v2 
verification-needed-lunar-linux-oracle

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-17 Thread Daniel Arai
So it looks like this patch was applied to linux/5.4.0-166.183,
linux/5.15.0-88.98, and linux/6.2.0-36.37, but I'm not seeing a request
for verification on the jammy-azure-5.15.0-1049 kernel series, and it
looks like linux-azure (5.15.0-1049.56) does not include the fix. Can we
get the azure kernel fixed as well?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-13 Thread Gaurav Kumar
I verified the issue on kernel linux/5.4.0-166.183, linux/5.15.0-88.98
and linux/6.2.0-36.37 and the issue is fixed. I was able to run enclave
in debug mode in all 3 kernels.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-lunar-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-lunar-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-13 Thread Gaurav Kumar
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-13 Thread Gaurav Kumar
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-focal-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-06 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux/6.2.0-36.37 kernel in
-proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug
with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag
'verification-needed-lunar-linux' to 'verification-done-lunar-linux'. If
the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-lunar-
linux' to 'verification-failed-lunar-linux'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-lunar-linux-v2 verification-needed-lunar-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-05 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux/5.4.0-166.183 kernel in
-proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug
with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag
'verification-needed-focal-linux' to 'verification-done-focal-linux'. If
the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal-
linux' to 'verification-failed-focal-linux'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-focal-linux-v2 verification-needed-focal-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-10-05 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux/5.15.0-88.98 kernel in
-proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug
with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag
'verification-needed-jammy-linux' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux'. If
the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-
linux' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-20 Thread Daniel Arai
This also affects 5.4.0 from 5.4.0-158 on. Is this version getting a
fix? It's not clear to me from the linked thread which kernel versions
are getting fixes, given that focal supports both 5.4 and 5.15 kernels.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-20 Thread Roxana Nicolescu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-20 Thread Roxana Nicolescu
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lunar)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lunar)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lunar)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-19 Thread Tim Gardner
Reposted the patch for all affected kernels:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2023-September/142913.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-19 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
FWIW, this not only affects the 5.15/jammy kernel series, but also at
least 6.2/lunar: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15223 , and also
affects non-SGX use cases like OpenZFS features that benefit from AVX
support (raidz, encryption, ..)

** Bug watch added: github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues #15223
   https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15223

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-13 Thread Tim Gardner
Patch submitted for review https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-
team/2023-September/142739.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-13 Thread Jethro Beekman
Thanks Gaurav

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-12 Thread Gaurav Kumar
I tested the changes today and was able to successfully run enclave in
debug mode. Thanks a lot Tim.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-12 Thread Tim Gardner
** Description changed:

  SRU Justification
  
  [Impact]
  
  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works fine
  in 5.15.0-1043.
  
  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.
  
  [Test Plan]
  
- User tested.
+ User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
+ applied regardless.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
  SGX could continue to fail.

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User test results pending, but its a fix commit so should likely be
  applied regardless.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-12 Thread Tim Gardner
** Description changed:

+ SRU Justification
+ 
+ [Impact]
+ 
  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works fine
  in 5.15.0-1043.
  
  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.
+ 
+ [Test Plan]
+ 
+ User tested.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+ SGX could continue to fail.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User tested.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-12 Thread Tim Gardner
** Package changed: linux-azure (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

  [Test Plan]

  User tested.

  [Regression Potential]

  SGX could continue to fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-12 Thread Tim Gardner
Please try the referenced kernel jammy-
azure-5.15.0-1049.56~lp2034745.1.tgz with the fix commit. Note that this
kernel is not signed for a UEFI secure boot environment.

** Attachment added: "Test kernel"
   
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~rtg/jammy-sgx-xsave-lp2034745/5.15.0-1049.56~lp2034745.1/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-azure in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux-azure package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2034745] Re: [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

2023-09-12 Thread Tim Gardner
** Package changed: linux-signed-azure-5.15 (Ubuntu) => linux-azure
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-azure in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034745

Title:
  [regression] Unable to initialize SGX enclaves with XFRM other than 3

Status in linux-azure package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In 5.15.0-1045, only loading enclaves with XFRM set to 3 works,
  sgx_encl_init returns EINVAL. The only reason this wouldn't work
  properly is if sgx_drv_init thinks XSAVE isn't enabled. This works
  fine in 5.15.0-1043.

  Likely cause:
  1045 adds this patch: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b81fac906a8f9e682e513ddd95697ec7a20878d4
 . This later patch indicates that the former patch introduced some ordering 
problems. 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2c66ca3949dc701da7f4c9407f2140ae425683a5
 . That later patch isn't applied to 1045.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2034745/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp