KR> HAPI issues?

2016-05-26 Thread chrisprata
yes, in fact, my 2200 is a late solid lifter version which had pretty much all 
the early issues (such as cooling fin configuration) resolved. ?one update that 
came later was to add 2 steel dowels between the crank and flywheel. The 
orignal design did not use dowels or shoulder bolts and relied on sheer 
friction (I guess). there were a very few failures so they issued the dowel 
spec. I had that done. by the dealer, and had the crank magnafluxed and checked 
(and no there was never any damage history whatsoever).

I flew this engine 3000 miles with no issues. these really purr like a kitten 
and sip fuel.

it only had 150 hours but because it sat, and the dowel update, we disassembled 
it and had the valve job done (with heads checked) honed and checked the cyls, 
etc etc and ordered all new through bolts, bearings, rings, the usual overhaul 
stuff. I left it apart until needed, in case of any more updates or anything, 
and to preserve it.

all that being said, the one issue that I'v read about is that these do not 
tolerate detonation well, it stretches the through bolts. I am interested to 
turbocharge my project eventually, and the VW is available with turbocharging 
now from at last two companies.?

(I saw on the interwebs that they are also turbocharging the jab 2200 in EU I 
should add).

I could always go to electronic ignition with knock sensor, and run the jab 
with a turbocharger.

one other consideration is the tendency for KR's to be a bit tail heavy. since 
I really would like th shortest nose possible, (in keeping with N1436 looks), 
the heavier VW is actually an advantage there.?

my jab is for sale, if it sells that funds things like wing skins etc, if not, 
I can just run it.

but there is plenty of time to decide.

so hopefully that should explain why the 2200, as great as they run, is not a 
definate best choice in my case.




?it seems you have the answer in your pocket.
> 
> Larry Flesner 
> 
> 


KR> BRS vs Bean Field

2015-07-29 Thread chrisprata
Yeah, exactly. My thoughts are that I'd rather hit anything at 5mph than at 60.


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

 Original message From: Dave Acklam via KRnet 
 Date:07/29/2015  7:09 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: KRnet  Cc: Dave Acklam 
 Subject: Re: KR> BRS vs Bean Field 


I have one BRS equipped plane - a Fisher ultralight

At least with that install, if I ever have to 'pull it' the BRS will likely
destroy the airframe in the process of getting me down safely...

The flip side is that if your flying area is devoid of survivable emergency
spots, it beats the hell out of crashing into a forest or skyscraper
On Jul 29, 2015 3:15 PM, "Mike Stirewalt via KRnet" 
wrote:

> Chris said,
>
> > "if nothing else, the peace of mind would seem worth it."
>
> It sure wouldn't contribute to _my_ peace of mind.  I would be annoyed
> every time I got in the plane and noted I had devoted valuable space to
> something fairly bulky that requires repacking and inspection
> periodically and costs quite a bit of money to buy and maintain.  That
> money would, in my case, be a lot better spent on something like an
> autopilot or some other luxury.  There's also that lurking thought in the
> back of my mind that the thing wouldn't work if I ever _did_ try and use
> it.  Which I wouldn't.  Pushing the button would make me feel like a big
> weenie.
>
> I've gotta admit a BRS, if it wasn't iced up like the rest of the plane,
> might have saved Ken Rand's life in the predicament he was in but how
> often does that happen?  I think only Ken would fly into an ice storm
> with no fuel left - 'course he wasn't expecting the ice.  There was no
> salvaging that situation other than with a BRS so clearly, in such an
> extreme situation, a BRS might have saved the day (again, if it wasn't
> frozen up like a popsicle).
>
> The best argument against carrying a "plane chute" though is simply
> looking at the record of Langford's forced landings.  My math is probably
> off, but a quick search of the records shows Mark has had 27 forced
> landings and never gotten a scratch.  He usually doesn't even mess up the
> plane.  With a parachute, once you push the button you're liable to land
> in a lake or on top of someone's roof.  In case of engine failure, if you
> fly the plane down instead of turning it over to the fickle finger of
> wherever the wind is blowing that day, the records show you almost always
> make it to a runway or a road or a golf course.  Catastrophic structural
> failure is another matter, but those don't seem to happen with KR's
> (seats breaking don't count).
>
> So, as a practical matter a plane parachute for a KR isn't a good idea.
> As a "peace of mind" issue, that may work for some people but it wouldn't
> work for me.  I wouldn't trust the thing to actually work, plus I
> wouldn't be able to bring myself to push the button (or yank the lanyard
> or however those things work).  KR flyers are not weenies.  We'd rather
> die than suffer the ignominy of helplessly floating down to earth under a
> canopy of shame.  But who am I to speak for all KR flyers?  Let's take a
> poll.
>
> Big WeenieNot a Big Weenie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike
> KSEE
>
>
>
>
> 
> Old School Yearbook Pics
> View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School & Year. Look Now!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/55b950343f1f050345a67st02vuc
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options
>
___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options


KR> brs vs bean field option

2015-07-28 Thread chrisprata
It's a canister style mounted on the front of the firewall! Interesting. My 
concern would be the heat.


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

 Original message 
From: Tony King via KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date:07/28/2015 5:28 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: KRnet
Cc: Tony King
Subject: Re: KR> brs vs bean field option

There is a KR on Oz with a BRS.? I haven't seen it up close, but it
belonged to Barry Kruyssen.? I know he had it for sale a while back.? Not
sure where it is now.

Take a look at http://www.athertonairport.com.au/kr2/

Cheers,

Tony

___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options


KR> Touchdown speed

2015-02-16 Thread chrisprata
Well said. ?The single most accurate information as to whether the wing will 
fly or stall, and tell you best climb, best glide, is Indicated Airspeed. ?

I would disagree that gps speed, or anything else is as relevant, even in calm 
air, for approach and landing.?

What does gps tell you? How fast over the ground? So what. I operated from high 
density altitude airports, my plane indicated the same speed at liftoff and in 
climb as at sea level, but I was charging doen the runway much faster, and used 
5x as much runway to lift up!

I suppose the gps said something, but so what, until the ASI said 65, I wasnt 
going anywhere. ?

Maybe I am missing some point here? For short field ops, I would practice my 
stalls at safe height to see where the safety cutoff is ASI, then conduct short 
field ops on a longer runway (in calm winds) and determine what my plane and 
skill level can repeatetly and safely do in terms of feet of runway. That would 
decide for me the shortest runway to use.






Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

?

Indicated airspeed is simply a "reference" number to fly by.? It is a 
factor of how dense the air is that's rammed in to the tube


KR> Flaps versus belly board versus spoilers

2015-01-13 Thread chrisprata
Have spoilers been installed and used on a KR1?

Where? Outer or inner wing? Do spoilers blanket ailerons with turbulent air?

On apch, I wonder if you'd pull the nose up when spoilers deployed to create a 
'dirty' configuration?

Anyone here running spoilers and or belly brake? Pics?

Thx


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

 Original message From: bjoenunley via KRnet 
 Date:01/13/2015  4:27 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Ronald Wright via KRnet  
Subject: Re: KR> Flaps versus belly board versus spoilers 

I like the spoiler concept. Easy to install. Between a belly board and spoilers 
we should stop in a hurry.

My question is; do we put holes in the spoilers to make them more efficient or 
not?

Just kidding about the holes,

Joe



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

 Original message From: Ronald Wright via KRnet 
 Date:01/13/2015  3:10 PM  (GMT-06:00) 
To: Chris Prata ,KRnet  Subject: KR> Flaps versus belly board versus 
spoilers 
The KRs really need SPOILERS..  They are much better than flaps and a lot 
easier to build/install.  Close a spoiler and you are instantly flying again.  
Dump a flap and you sink first and then get to climb again.  Personally, I love 
spoilers!

Ron



On Tue, 1/13/15, Chris Prata via KRnet  wrote:

Subject: Re: KR> TriGear?
To: "krnet at list.krnet.org" 
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2015, 2:11 PM

Flaps?  Are they fairly easy to
build in and are they effective?  Also wondering about
the Belly Brake option. This design is slippery, I'd love to
have another choice manage the energy on approach besides a
forward slip or slowing down way back at the start of
downwind. I'd rather have the energy the whole time, and be
able to brake on final.

From: danrh at windstream.net
To: chrisprata at live.com;
krnet at list.krnet.org
Subject: RE: KR> TriGear?
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 05:59:25 -0500

You may be mistaken about the one less thing.  My
opinion is that it is one more thing to go wrong.  I
have never heard of a broken tail wheel causing a serious
accident, but certainly have heard of several where the nose
wheel broke.  A fixed gear KR1 would be a very simple
machine to fly, especially if you could add flaps. See N64KR
at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
2015 KR Gathering - McMinnville, OR.  September 3 - 6
-- See U There. Peoples Choice at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt.
Vernon, Il ? MVN Best KR at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt.
Vernon, Il ? MVN Best Interior at 2013 - KR Gathering in
Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN Best Paint at 2013 - KR Gathering in
Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN Best Firwwall Forward at 2013 - KR
Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN  Best Interior and
Panel at 2008 ? KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC  -Original
Message-

Trigear would mean one less thing that can go




___
Search the KRnet Archives at
http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
to change options

___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options
___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options