--- On Sat, 10/23/10, mbz...@comcast.net <mbz...@comcast.net> wrote:
> From: mbz...@comcast.net <mbz...@comcast.net>
> Subject: KR> Exhaust headres
Here are a few pieces of info for consideration. There is an STC'ed tuned
exhaust system for 172's that gives about 8% more power. I've seen it installed
on AC set up for floats to help with the increased gross weight.
http://www.piteraq.dk/flight/exhaust.html Has alot of info for the design of a
tuned system as well as http://www.piteraq.dk/flight/muffler.html for the
silent muffler to knock down alot of dB's.
I've been working on a friend's plane for a little over 5 years which is now
flying. It's not a KR but it's great to learn on someone else's dime.
http://elginwells.com/Pages/Starjammer%20progress%20pix.html The next to the
last pic is a great shot of the tuned headers and the mufflers. The noise
reduction has been quite good even w/o the correct roving in the mufflers which
should be corrected this week. This is a firebreathing monster which easily
does manuvers most of us can't imagine and has been fun to work on. Take a look
around Elgin's site to celebrate the joys and freedom of experimental A/C
Gene Timson
gtme...@yahoo.com
> On cars, headers accounted for up to 5% increase in horse
> power. What is the reason
> why the same can not be true for aircraft conversions? I
> guess at cruise the exhaust gases are efficiently
> evacuated and maybe headers will not give much of an
> increase in hp. But still I think it would be a benefit
> for the weight at take-off and climb. And also would
> increase the smoothness of the engine.
> Looking at the exhaust examples, I wonder if the exhaust
> really is tuned for the engine, or can the back-pressure
> be smoothed out.
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>