Re: [kvm-devel] slides of kvm forum
Dor, Thanks! DS On 9/5/07, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > - Are any slides of kvm forum presentation available ? I cannot find any, > - Is there a chance seeing them on the web? > > DS > > > > We'll publish them all as soon as we collect them from all participants, > hope it will happen real soon. > > All the presenters, as requested, please send your presentations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks, Dor. > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
[kvm-devel] slides of kvm forum
Hi, - Are any slides of kvm forum presentation available ? I cannot find any, - Is there a chance seeing them on the web? DS - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
Re: [kvm-devel] Network definitions in a guest (FC6) under kvm
Hello, And I just want to add some info : running : "brctl show" gives: bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000. no which means that there is no interface enslaved to this bridge. Regards, DS On 7/12/07, David Shwatrz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks; I am not sure I got you ! running "ifconfig -a " on the host shows the following: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:24:1D:EC:C0 inet addr: 192.168.0.31 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21b:24ff:fe1d:ecc0/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:10164222 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:95594 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:3427235680 (3.1 GiB) TX bytes:27635785 (26.3 MiB) Interrupt:19 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:5821 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:5821 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:804856 (785.9 KiB) TX bytes:804856 (785.9 KiB) virbr0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr: 192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask: 255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:93 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:21586 ( 21.0 KiB) As you can see, there is not "sit" interface here. There is a virbr0 (bridge) but on 192.168.122.1 Please advice; also if you can please send the script, maybe I can get some ideas from it regarding what to do. Regards, DS On 7/12/07, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/12/07, David Shwatrz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have kvm on FC7. I had installed an FC6 guest on it according to the > > kvm howto. I can launch the FC6 guest (using kvm) perfectly ok. > > During installation, I set the IP address of the guest to be > > 192.168.0.11/24 and defualt gw to 192.168.0.1. > > These definitions are OK (I simply run "ifconfig -a" from the > > guest , FC7, and see that these definitions are maintained, and the > nic is > > UP > > and running). > > > > On the other hand, I cannot ping it from the host (192.168.0.10 ) , > > and also vice versa: I cannot ping the host from the guest, > > namely, I cannot ping 192.168.0.10 from 192.168.0.11. > > > > Any ideas ? is something missing here ? > > You should tell us more about your setup. It seems that you you are > not using a bridged configuration; if eth0 has address 192.168.0.10 > then packets for 192.168.0.0/24 are routed through eth0 (an the > virtual interface sit0 doesn't see them). > You can either: > - use a different subnet for the VMs, configure the kernel to forward > packets between the 2 networks > - create a bridge that spans across eth0 and sit0, so that it becomes > an unique net segment > > I have a script for the 2nd solution, I can send as soon as I get home > if you're interested. > > Luca > - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
Re: [kvm-devel] Network definitions in a guest (FC6) under kvm
Thanks; I am not sure I got you ! running "ifconfig -a " on the host shows the following: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:24:1D:EC:C0 inet addr:192.168.0.31 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21b:24ff:fe1d:ecc0/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:10164222 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:95594 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:3427235680 (3.1 GiB) TX bytes:27635785 (26.3 MiB) Interrupt:19 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:5821 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:5821 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:804856 (785.9 KiB) TX bytes:804856 (785.9 KiB) virbr0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:93 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:21586 (21.0 KiB) As you can see, there is not "sit" interface here. There is a virbr0 (bridge) but on 192.168.122.1 Please advice; also if you can please send the script, maybe I can get some ideas from it regarding what to do. Regards, DS On 7/12/07, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/12/07, David Shwatrz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have kvm on FC7. I had installed an FC6 guest on it according to the > kvm howto. I can launch the FC6 guest (using kvm) perfectly ok. > During installation, I set the IP address of the guest to be > 192.168.0.11/24 and defualt gw to 192.168.0.1. > These definitions are OK (I simply run "ifconfig -a" from the > guest , FC7, and see that these definitions are maintained, and the nic is > UP > and running). > > On the other hand, I cannot ping it from the host (192.168.0.10) , > and also vice versa: I cannot ping the host from the guest, > namely, I cannot ping 192.168.0.10 from 192.168.0.11. > > Any ideas ? is something missing here ? You should tell us more about your setup. It seems that you you are not using a bridged configuration; if eth0 has address 192.168.0.10 then packets for 192.168.0.0/24 are routed through eth0 (an the virtual interface sit0 doesn't see them). You can either: - use a different subnet for the VMs, configure the kernel to forward packets between the 2 networks - create a bridge that spans across eth0 and sit0, so that it becomes an unique net segment I have a script for the 2nd solution, I can send as soon as I get home if you're interested. Luca - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
[kvm-devel] Network definitions in a guest (FC6) under kvm
Hello, I have kvm on FC7. I had installed an FC6 guest on it according to the kvm howto. I can launch the FC6 guest (using kvm) perfectly ok. During installation, I set the IP address of the guest to be 192.168.0.11/24 and defualt gw to 192.168.0.1. These definitions are OK (I simply run "ifconfig -a" from the guest , FC7, and see that these definitions are maintained, and the nic is UP and running). On the other hand, I cannot ping it from the host (192.168.0.10) , and also vice versa: I cannot ping the host from the guest, namely, I cannot ping 192.168.0.10 from 192.168.0.11. Any ideas ? is something missing here ? Regards, David - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
Re: [kvm-devel] kvm: disabled by bios error
Avi, I am not running xen kernel; uname -a Linux sbc32 2.6.21-rc7 #1 SMP Sun Apr 29 11:49:40 IDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This is a kernel I built from source. (2.6.21-rc7) so I suppose it should be ok. Regards, David S. On 5/7/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Shwatrz wrote: > Thanks. > Sorry, but as I said: VT is enabled in bios. I had booted and > rechecked it. > Any other ideas? Are you running a Xen kernel perhaps? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
Re: [kvm-devel] kvm: disabled by bios error
Thanks. Sorry, but as I said: VT is enabled in bios. I had booted and rechecked it. Any other ideas? Ds On 5/7/07, Jun Koi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/7/07, David Shwatrz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I tried to build kvm-21 on a dual core Intel machine (x86_64). > I **had** enabled virtualization in BIOS and rechecked it. > cat /proc/cpu shows the "vmx" in flag: > > I run: > modprobe kvm > and it is OK. > modrobe kvm-intel > and I get , in the kernel log, > kvm: disabled by bios > and the kvm-intel module is NOT loaded. > Your machine supports VT, but it is disabled in BIOS setup. So go to BIOS setup and enable it. However, some machines (like some Thinkpad x60) need to update BIOS to be able to enable VT. Check to see if your machine falls into this case. Jun - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
[kvm-devel] kvm: disabled by bios error
Hello, I tried to build kvm-21 on a dual core Intel machine (x86_64). I **had** enabled virtualization in BIOS and rechecked it. cat /proc/cpu shows the "vmx" in flag: I run: modprobe kvm and it is OK. modrobe kvm-intel and I get , in the kernel log, kvm: disabled by bios and the kvm-intel module is NOT loaded. Any ideas why ? Regards, Dan - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
