Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-03-05 Thread david ahern
Try adding the noapic option to your guest kernel. I re-ran that test on kvm-62
and my VM was able to run under load for more than 3-1/2 days (the network never
locked up; I stopped the test to try other variations).

One side effect of the noapic option is that irq balancing is disabled -- all
interrupts are delivered via CPU 0. I ran a few tests earlier this week without
the noapic option (hence with the apic) but with irq balancing disabled and
still had the lockups. It seems to be something specific to the apic.

david


Eckersid SIlapaswang wrote:
 david ahern daahern at cisco.com writes:
 
 I know this issue has been discussed on this list before, but I am still
 experiencing network freezes in a guest that requires a restart to clear. 
 When
 the network freezes in the guest I no longer see the network interrupts 
 counter
 incrementing (i.e., the eth0 counter in /proc/interrupts in the guest). Using
 the crash utility, I verified that the interrupt is still enabled on the 
 guest
 side and that no interrupts are pending. This suggests that the interrupts 
 are
 not getting delivered to the VM.
 
 I just wanted to let the developers know that I'm having similar problems
 concerning interrupts with networking dying as well.
 
 Running a stress test of kvm using an EnGarde Secure Linux 1.5 guest OS.
 Under a heavy network email load, the guest OS networking gets knocked out
 - unable to ping, ssh, etc. Can only get things started again by going
 into vncviewer and restarting the networking services from there.
 
 CPUs: 8 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz
 KVM 52-1
 Host Kernel: 2.6.25-rc2
 Kernel Arch: x86_64
 Guest OS: EnGarde Secure Linux 32bit i686, 2.4.31-1.5.60
 
 Command Line:
 /usr/bin/qemu-system -hda /root/images/bwimail01.img -boot c -m 384 -smp 4
 -std-vga -net nic,vlan=0,macaddr=52:54:00:12:34:6F -net
 tap,ifname=tap1,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -vnc 192.168.1.57:1 
 
 Please let me know if you need anymore information and if I could be of any
 assistance in providing information to have this issue resolved.
 
 
 
 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 kvm-devel mailing list
 kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-03-05 Thread Avi Kivity
david ahern wrote:
 Try adding the noapic option to your guest kernel. I re-ran that test on 
 kvm-62
 and my VM was able to run under load for more than 3-1/2 days (the network 
 never
 locked up; I stopped the test to try other variations).

 One side effect of the noapic option is that irq balancing is disabled -- all
 interrupts are delivered via CPU 0. I ran a few tests earlier this week 
 without
 the noapic option (hence with the apic) but with irq balancing disabled and
 still had the lockups. It seems to be something specific to the apic.

   

I got good results with apic and e1000.  Can you try it?

May be a guest driver bug.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-03-05 Thread david ahern
I did not have any better luck with the e1000 or pcnet nics when running kvm-61.
I'll try again with kvm-63 and get back to you.

david


Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 Try adding the noapic option to your guest kernel. I re-ran that test
 on kvm-62
 and my VM was able to run under load for more than 3-1/2 days (the
 network never
 locked up; I stopped the test to try other variations).

 One side effect of the noapic option is that irq balancing is disabled
 -- all
 interrupts are delivered via CPU 0. I ran a few tests earlier this
 week without
 the noapic option (hence with the apic) but with irq balancing
 disabled and
 still had the lockups. It seems to be something specific to the apic.

   
 
 I got good results with apic and e1000.  Can you try it?
 
 May be a guest driver bug.
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-03-04 Thread Eckersid SIlapaswang
david ahern daahern at cisco.com writes:

 I know this issue has been discussed on this list before, but I am still
 experiencing network freezes in a guest that requires a restart to clear. When
 the network freezes in the guest I no longer see the network interrupts 
 counter
 incrementing (i.e., the eth0 counter in /proc/interrupts in the guest). Using
 the crash utility, I verified that the interrupt is still enabled on the guest
 side and that no interrupts are pending. This suggests that the interrupts are
 not getting delivered to the VM.

I just wanted to let the developers know that I'm having similar problems
concerning interrupts with networking dying as well.

Running a stress test of kvm using an EnGarde Secure Linux 1.5 guest OS.
Under a heavy network email load, the guest OS networking gets knocked out
- unable to ping, ssh, etc. Can only get things started again by going
into vncviewer and restarting the networking services from there.

CPUs: 8 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz
KVM 52-1
Host Kernel: 2.6.25-rc2
Kernel Arch: x86_64
Guest OS: EnGarde Secure Linux 32bit i686, 2.4.31-1.5.60

Command Line:
/usr/bin/qemu-system -hda /root/images/bwimail01.img -boot c -m 384 -smp 4
-std-vga -net nic,vlan=0,macaddr=52:54:00:12:34:6F -net
tap,ifname=tap1,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -vnc 192.168.1.57:1 

Please let me know if you need anymore information and if I could be of any
assistance in providing information to have this issue resolved.



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-26 Thread Avi Kivity
david ahern wrote:
 Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.

   

How long does it usually take to hang?

How do I go about reproducing this? apachebench (host) against httpd 
(guest) doesn't seem to trigger it.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-26 Thread david ahern
Usually within a few hours, sometimes within 30 minutes.

Load averages as computed by sysstat in the nightly sar files:

rxpck/s   txpck/s   rxbyt/s   txbyt/s
 eth0975.18   1188.34  82044.06 171655.38

Interrupts come in at 1830/sec for eth0, 250/sec for the timer and 20/sec or 
ide0.

Are you using a RHEL4 image?

david



Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.

   
 
 How long does it usually take to hang?
 
 How do I go about reproducing this? apachebench (host) against httpd
 (guest) doesn't seem to trigger it.
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-26 Thread Avi Kivity
Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.

   

 How long does it usually take to hang?

 How do I go about reproducing this? apachebench (host) against httpd 
 (guest) doesn't seem to trigger it.


ab (on host) against httpd (on guest) reproduces within a few minutes.

uniprocessor guest: works
smp guest: fails
smp guest with one offlined cpu: works
smp guest with httpd pinned to cpu 0: works

so it's either a guest driver smp problem, or an ioapic problem.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-26 Thread david ahern
I noted in my original post that if I increase the weight parameter in the
driver to have it pull more packets on each poll before taking it break then it
takes longer to freeze.

I have looked at a newer version of the 8139cp driver. Very few changes to the
poll function; most of them seem to be accommodating changes to the
netdevice/napi api. I'll take a closer look at it today.

david


Avi Kivity wrote:
 Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.

   

 How long does it usually take to hang?

 How do I go about reproducing this? apachebench (host) against httpd
 (guest) doesn't seem to trigger it.

 
 ab (on host) against httpd (on guest) reproduces within a few minutes.
 
 uniprocessor guest: works
 smp guest: fails
 smp guest with one offlined cpu: works
 smp guest with httpd pinned to cpu 0: works
 
 so it's either a guest driver smp problem, or an ioapic problem.
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-26 Thread Avi Kivity
david ahern wrote:
 Usually within a few hours, sometimes within 30 minutes.

 Load averages as computed by sysstat in the nightly sar files:

 rxpck/s   txpck/s   rxbyt/s   txbyt/s
  eth0975.18   1188.34  82044.06 171655.38

 Interrupts come in at 1830/sec for eth0, 250/sec for the timer and 20/sec or 
 ide0.

 Are you using a RHEL4 image?
   

Nope, FC6 x86_64.

My apachebench command line is

  ab -c 150 -n 1000  -k http://guest/

12K eth interrupts/sec, 20 ide interrupts/sec, 250Hz timer.

The served file is quite small, so many small packets.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-25 Thread Avi Kivity
david ahern wrote:
 I've run a lot more tests:


 - if I remove the if (!change) return optimization from pci_set_irq the
 rtl8139 nic worked fine for 16+ hours. I'm not recommending this as a fix, 
 just
 confirming that the problem goes away.

   

Interesting.  What can cause this to happen?

- some non-pci device shares the same irq (unlikely)

- the pci link sharing is broken.  Is the eth0 irq shared?

Please post /proc/interrupts.

- the in-kernel ioapic is buggy and needs the extra kicking the 
optimization prevents.  Can be checked by re-adding the optimization to 
kvm_ioapic_set_irq() (keeping it removed in qemu).  If it works, the 
problem is in userspace.  If it fails, the problem is in the kernel.

Something like

  static int old_level[16];

  if (level == old_level[irq])
 return;
  old_level[irq] = level;



-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-25 Thread david ahern
Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 I've run a lot more tests:


 - if I remove the if (!change) return optimization from pci_set_irq the
 rtl8139 nic worked fine for 16+ hours. I'm not recommending this as a
 fix, just
 confirming that the problem goes away.

   
 
 Interesting.  What can cause this to happen?
 
 - some non-pci device shares the same irq (unlikely)
 
 - the pci link sharing is broken.  Is the eth0 irq shared?

interrupt is not shared.

 
 Please post /proc/interrupts.

# cat /proc/interrupts
   CPU0   CPU1
  0:  10566  46468IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:  5  5IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  8:  0  1IO-APIC-edge  rtc
  9:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
 11: 243118   5656   IO-APIC-level  eth0
 12:180 45IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 14:   2021  12592IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 15: 14 10IO-APIC-edge  ide1
NMI:  0  0
LOC:  56947  56946
ERR:  0
MIS: 31


 
 - the in-kernel ioapic is buggy and needs the extra kicking the
 optimization prevents.  Can be checked by re-adding the optimization to
 kvm_ioapic_set_irq() (keeping it removed in qemu).  If it works, the
 problem is in userspace.  If it fails, the problem is in the kernel.
 
 Something like
 
  static int old_level[16];
 
  if (level == old_level[irq])
 return;
  old_level[irq] = level;
 
 
 

I'll give this a shot and let you know.

If you are interested, here's some more info on the -no-kvm-irqchip option:
qemu ends up spinning with 1 thread consuming 100% cpu. Output from top
(literally the top 11 lines) with 'show threads' and individual cpu stats:

Tasks: 125 total,   2 running, 123 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu0  :  0.0%us,  0.0%sy,  0.0%ni,100.0%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Cpu1  :  0.0%us,  0.0%sy,  0.0%ni,100.0%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Cpu2  :100.0%us,  0.0%sy,  0.0%ni,  0.0%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Cpu3  :  1.0%us,  0.0%sy,  0.0%ni, 99.0%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   4046804k total,  4013480k used,33324k free,42512k buffers
Swap:  2096472k total,  120k used,  2096352k free,  1159892k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND

 4441 root  20   0 2675m 2.5g 9808 R  100 65.0 499:34.09 qemu-system-x86

 4426 root  20   0 2675m 2.5g 9808 S1 65.0  16:24.50 qemu-system-x86

...


Hooking up gdb shows it cycling with the following backtrace:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x2ad97b5ee3e8 in do_sigtimedwait () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x2ad97b5ee4ae in sigtimedwait () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x004fb7df in kvm_eat_signal (env=0x2ade460, timeout=10) at
/opt/kvm/kvm-61/qemu/qemu-kvm.c:156
#3  0x004fb9e4 in kvm_eat_signals (env=0x2ade460, timeout=10)
at /opt/kvm/kvm-61/qemu/qemu-kvm.c:192
#4  0x004fba49 in kvm_main_loop_wait (env=0x2ade460, timeout=10)
at /opt/kvm/kvm-61/qemu/qemu-kvm.c:211
#5  0x004fc278 in kvm_main_loop_cpu (env=0x2ade460) at
/opt/kvm/kvm-61/qemu/qemu-kvm.c:299
#6  0x0040ff2d in main (argc=value optimized out, argv=0x7fff304607b8)
at /opt/kvm/kvm-61/qemu/vl.c:7856

I have a dump of CPUX86State *env if you want to see it.

david

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-25 Thread david ahern

david ahern wrote:
 Avi Kivity wrote:
 - the in-kernel ioapic is buggy and needs the extra kicking the
 optimization prevents.  Can be checked by re-adding the optimization to
 kvm_ioapic_set_irq() (keeping it removed in qemu).  If it works, the
 problem is in userspace.  If it fails, the problem is in the kernel.

 Something like

  static int old_level[16];

  if (level == old_level[irq])
 return;
  old_level[irq] = level;


With the if (!change) return; taken out of pci_set_irq() and the above code
added to kvm_ioapic_set_irq() networking froze.

david

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-25 Thread Avi Kivity
david ahern wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
   
 Avi Kivity wrote:
 
 - the in-kernel ioapic is buggy and needs the extra kicking the
 optimization prevents.  Can be checked by re-adding the optimization to
 kvm_ioapic_set_irq() (keeping it removed in qemu).  If it works, the
 problem is in userspace.  If it fails, the problem is in the kernel.

 Something like

  static int old_level[16];

  if (level == old_level[irq])
 return;
  old_level[irq] = level;

   

 With the if (!change) return; taken out of pci_set_irq() and the above code
 added to kvm_ioapic_set_irq() networking froze.
   

That points the finger at the kernel ioapic.

I saw from the /proc/interrupts dump that it's an smp guest.  Does it 
freeze on uniprocessor as well?  Maybe it's bad locking in the kernel.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-25 Thread david ahern
Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.

david


Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
   
 Avi Kivity wrote:
 
 - the in-kernel ioapic is buggy and needs the extra kicking the
 optimization prevents.  Can be checked by re-adding the optimization to
 kvm_ioapic_set_irq() (keeping it removed in qemu).  If it works, the
 problem is in userspace.  If it fails, the problem is in the kernel.

 Something like

  static int old_level[16];

  if (level == old_level[irq])
 return;
  old_level[irq] = level;

   
 With the if (!change) return; taken out of pci_set_irq() and the above code
 added to kvm_ioapic_set_irq() networking froze.
   
 
 That points the finger at the kernel ioapic.
 
 I saw from the /proc/interrupts dump that it's an smp guest.  Does it 
 freeze on uniprocessor as well?  Maybe it's bad locking in the kernel.
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-24 Thread Avi Kivity
david ahern wrote:
 I know this issue has been discussed on this list before, but I am still
 experiencing network freezes in a guest that requires a restart to clear. When
 the network freezes in the guest I no longer see the network interrupts 
 counter
 incrementing (i.e., the eth0 counter in /proc/interrupts in the guest). Using
 the crash utility, I verified that the interrupt is still enabled on the guest
 side and that no interrupts are pending. This suggests that the interrupts are
 not getting delivered to the VM.

   

[...]

 I am continuing to look into the irq processing on the kvm/qemu side. I'd like
 to know if anyone has suggestions on what to look at. This is my first foray
 into the kvm and qemu code, and it's a lot to take in all at once.

   

Standard procedure is to run with -no-kvm and -no-kvm-irqchip, to see if 
the problem is in qemu proper, the in-kernel irq handling, or the rest 
of kvm.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel


Re: [kvm-devel] still seeing network freezes with rtl8139 nic

2008-02-24 Thread david ahern
I've run a lot more tests:

- with the -no-kvm-irqchip option the vm eventully stops responding to network
or console,

- with the -no-kvm option the performance is so bad I cannot get our ap up and
running so the results are inconclusive,

- I've tried the e1000 and pcnet nic models and both showed the network lockup;
with the ne2k_pci nic I did not see dropped packets and the network never locked
up in 12+ hours, but system CPU time was 10% higher than when the rtl8139 nic
was working

- if I remove the if (!change) return optimization from pci_set_irq the
rtl8139 nic worked fine for 16+ hours. I'm not recommending this as a fix, just
confirming that the problem goes away.

- I tried adding a thread mutex to the rtl8139 device model around accesses to
the RTL8139State data, but the network still locked up.

david


Avi Kivity wrote:
 david ahern wrote:
 I know this issue has been discussed on this list before, but I am still
 experiencing network freezes in a guest that requires a restart to clear. 
 When
 the network freezes in the guest I no longer see the network interrupts 
 counter
 incrementing (i.e., the eth0 counter in /proc/interrupts in the guest). Using
 the crash utility, I verified that the interrupt is still enabled on the 
 guest
 side and that no interrupts are pending. This suggests that the interrupts 
 are
 not getting delivered to the VM.

   
 
 [...]
 
 I am continuing to look into the irq processing on the kvm/qemu side. I'd 
 like
 to know if anyone has suggestions on what to look at. This is my first foray
 into the kvm and qemu code, and it's a lot to take in all at once.

   
 
 Standard procedure is to run with -no-kvm and -no-kvm-irqchip, to see if 
 the problem is in qemu proper, the in-kernel irq handling, or the rest 
 of kvm.
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel