> -Original Message-
> From: Will Deacon [mailto:w...@kernel.org]
> Sent: 21 July 2021 16:23
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; m...@kernel.org; catalin.mari...@arm.com;
> james.mo...@arm.com; julien.thierry.k...@gmail.com;
> suzuki.poul...@arm.com; jean-phili...@linaro.org;
> alexandru.eli...@arm.com; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arch/arm64: Introduce a capability to tell whether
> 16-bit VMID is available
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > From: Julien Grall
> >
> > At the moment, the function kvm_get_vmid_bits() is looking up for the
> > sanitized value of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 and extract the information
> > regarding the number of VMID bits supported.
> >
> > This is fine as the function is mainly used during VMID roll-over. New
> > use in a follow-up patch will require the function to be called a every
> > context switch so we want the function to be more efficient.
> >
> > A new capability is introduced to tell whether 16-bit VMID is
> > available.
>
> I don't really buy this rationale. The VMID allocator introduced later on
> caches this value in the static 'vmid_bits' variable, and that gets used
> on vCPU enter via vmid_gen_match() in the kvm_arm_update_vmid() fastpath.
>
> So I would prefer that we just expose an accessor for that than introduce
> a static key and new cpufeature just for kvm_get_vttbr().
Ok. Will change it to an accessor.
Thanks,
Shameer
___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
