Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Replace power_off with mp_state in struct kvm_vcpu_arch
Hi Jean-Philippe, On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:54 PM Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > In order to add a new "suspend" power state, replace power_off with > mp_state in struct kvm_vcpu_arch. Factor the vcpu_off() function while > we're here. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 -- > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 29 +++-- > arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c | 19 ++- > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 7cd7d5c8c4bc..55a04f4d5919 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { > u32 mdscr_el1; > } guest_debug_preserved; > > - /* vcpu power-off state */ > - bool power_off; > + /* vcpu power state (runnable, stopped, halted) */ Should the comment be, for clarity, something along the lines of KVM_MP_STATE_(STOPPED, RUNNABLE, HALTED), or maybe "a valid struct kvm_mp_state", if you think other states might be added in the future? Thanks, /fuad > + u32 mp_state; > > /* Don't run the guest (internal implementation need) */ > bool pause; > @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >struct kvm_device_attr *attr); > int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >struct kvm_device_attr *attr); > +void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > +bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */ > int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > index e720148232a0..bcc24adb9c0a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > @@ -435,21 +435,22 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vcpu->cpu = -1; > } > > -static void vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - vcpu->arch.power_off = true; > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED; > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu); > kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu); > } > > +bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + return vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED; > +} > + > int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state) > { > - if (vcpu->arch.power_off) > - mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED; > - else > - mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; > - > + mp_state->mp_state = vcpu->arch.mp_state; > return 0; > } > > @@ -460,10 +461,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu > *vcpu, > > switch (mp_state->mp_state) { > case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE: > - vcpu->arch.power_off = false; > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; > break; > case KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED: > - vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > break; > default: > ret = -EINVAL; > @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v) > { > bool irq_lines = *vcpu_hcr(v) & (HCR_VI | HCR_VF); > return ((irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v)) > - && !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause); > + && !kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(v) && !v->arch.pause); > } > > bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -643,10 +644,10 @@ static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct rcuwait *wait = kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu); > > rcuwait_wait_event(wait, > - (!vcpu->arch.power_off) &&(!vcpu->arch.pause), > + !kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu) && !vcpu->arch.pause, >TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > - if (vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause) { > + if (kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu) || vcpu->arch.pause) { > /* Awaken to handle a signal, request we sleep again later. */ > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu); > } > @@ -1087,9 +1088,9 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct > kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > * Handle the "start in power-off" case. > */ > if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features)) > - vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > else > - vcpu->arch.power_off = false; > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c > index db4056ecccfd..24b4a2265
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Replace power_off with mp_state in struct kvm_vcpu_arch
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:48:02 +0200 Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > In order to add a new "suspend" power state, replace power_off with > mp_state in struct kvm_vcpu_arch. Factor the vcpu_off() function while > we're here. Hi Jean-Phillipe, 2 changes, so if you do end up doing a v2 I'd prefer the factor out of kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off() + possibly introduced kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off() using the old boolean. Then the change in how you track the state will be a bit easier to pick out. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 -- > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 29 +++-- > arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c | 19 ++- > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 7cd7d5c8c4bc..55a04f4d5919 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { > u32 mdscr_el1; > } guest_debug_preserved; > > - /* vcpu power-off state */ > - bool power_off; > + /* vcpu power state (runnable, stopped, halted) */ > + u32 mp_state; > > /* Don't run the guest (internal implementation need) */ > bool pause; > @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct kvm_device_attr *attr); > int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct kvm_device_attr *attr); > +void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > +bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */ > int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > index e720148232a0..bcc24adb9c0a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > @@ -435,21 +435,22 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vcpu->cpu = -1; > } > > -static void vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - vcpu->arch.power_off = true; > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED; > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu); > kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu); > } > > +bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + return vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED; > +} > + > int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state) > { > - if (vcpu->arch.power_off) > - mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED; > - else > - mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; > - > + mp_state->mp_state = vcpu->arch.mp_state; Nice to have a blank line here. > return 0; > } > > @@ -460,10 +461,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu > *vcpu, > > switch (mp_state->mp_state) { > case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE: > - vcpu->arch.power_off = false; > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; > break; > case KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED: > - vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > break; > default: > ret = -EINVAL; > @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v) > { > bool irq_lines = *vcpu_hcr(v) & (HCR_VI | HCR_VF); > return ((irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v)) > - && !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause); > + && !kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(v) && !v->arch.pause); > } > > bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -643,10 +644,10 @@ static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct rcuwait *wait = kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu); > > rcuwait_wait_event(wait, > -(!vcpu->arch.power_off) &&(!vcpu->arch.pause), > +!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu) && !vcpu->arch.pause, > TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > - if (vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause) { > + if (kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu) || vcpu->arch.pause) { > /* Awaken to handle a signal, request we sleep again later. */ > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu); > } > @@ -1087,9 +1088,9 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct > kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >* Handle the "start in power-off" case. >*/ > if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features)) > - vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > else > - vcpu->arch.power_off = false; > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c > index db4056ecccfd..24b4a2265dbd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/k