Libya: Dreams of Western Intervention
                                        
                                 
                                by Susil Gupta, 
                                February 26, 2011                               
                                                

                                
                
         

                                
                
                
                
                        
                                
                                
                                          
    The crisis in Libya is quickly becoming an international 
embarrassment. Not, this time, because of Gadhafi’s clowinsh antics, but
 because it provides a spectacular opportunity for the world to see just
 how much Western power has declined during the last decade. 
  
    Despite being the most powerful nation on earth, and having a 
military apparatus on a scale greater than the sum of every other 
country, the US has patently failed to impose its solutions in Iraq, 
Afghanistan and Pakistan. Far from America being able to force the 
Ayatollahs into submission, Iran gains strategic ground every day. The 
financial crisis has paralyzed the power of Western finance. Western 
central bankers have had to go begging to China and the oil rich 
countries for loans. The Arab revolt of 2011 has now destroyed the 
exclusive grip Anglo-American rule once had in the region. 
  
    And now Libya promises to make explicit the powerlessness of the 
West. As Laurence Pope, ex-political advisor to the US "Central Command"
 and ex-ambassador to Tripoli told Le Monde in a sobering assessment, 
"Washington finds itself in a situation where there are only bad options and 
others that are worse." 
  
    What has been the response in Europe? The European Left and the 
liberal bourgeoisie remain very interventionist and are firm believers 
in "humanitarian bombing." They are clamoring for a muscular Nato 
intervention along Balkan lines. An editorial in Left-leaning Guardian
 supports the call by liberal Lord Owen that "military preparations 
should be made and the necessary diplomatic approaches, above all to the
 Russians and the Chinese, set in train to secure UN authority for such 
action." Should the crisis continue, the Guardian argues, 
"intervention on the ground would have to be considered. The Egyptian 
army has the means, other Arab countries could contribute, and western 
forces could help." Yes, and it would all be over by Christmas. 
  
    It is obvious that these war enthusiasts have not thought this 
through – but then they would not be doing any of the fighting. The 
plain fact is that there are no feasible military interventions even if 
the major powers could agree on an intervention plan, which is very far 
from being the case. Consider the options.
  
    Imposing a no fly zone. This would require extensive air patrols by 
foreign air forces. They would have little effect since air power is not
 key to Gadhafi’s strategy. It would, however, create an atmosphere of 
major war and give Gadhafi a propaganda boost. 
  
    Creating a military barrier or cordon sanitaire around 
eastern Libya to protect rebel positions.  Likewise this would 
crystallize the situation into a two-sided war, which could only play 
into Gadhafi’s hands. It is to the advantage of those that want to 
topple Gadhafi to avoid a war of entrenchment or fixed positions, 
preventing them from permeating every level of society and undermine 
further his crumbing power base. In any case such Western intervention 
would be impossible to implement. No Western commander is going to 
deploy troops at short notice into a theater unknown to his troops but 
well-known to an enemy who, in any case, cannot be easily distinguished 
from friendly forces. It is a recipe for disaster.
  
    Sending in a "peace keeping" African Union force to separate the 
parties. One way to unite every Libyan behind Gadhafi, given the 
reputation of such forces in the past.
  
    Sending in a "peace keeping" force made up of troops from Arab countries as 
The Guardian
 recommends. One way to unite every Libyan behind Gadhafi and infect and
 inflame the whole of the Middle East with the vicissitudes of a Libyan 
civil war. 
  
    Bomb. But where? Tripoli? Gadhafi’s hideout?  In addition to the 
lack of any meaningful target, Western bombing might give others the 
idea of bombing targets that are indeed of great strategic value: oil 
wells and pipe lines. 
  
    Sanctions. Libya’s massively long borders are totally porous and 
populated by peoples and countries keen to do business and who don’t 
give a damn about UN Security Council resolutions.  On the contrary, 
given the strategic importance of Libyan oil and gas to several European
 nations, Libya is the only country in a position to apply effective 
sanctions against anyone else. The price of oil has already 
shot up to $110.  Watch how the Italians start screaming in the next 
couple of weeks if the crisis goes on much longer. 
  
    Unsurprisingly, Cameron and Sarkozy are making angry statements but 
otherwise are just looking at their 
shoes.http://original.antiwar.com/susil-gupta/2011/02/25/libya-dreams-of-western-intervention/


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to