Re: [Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

[Florian Klämpfl via Lazarus]

Am 03.04.2018 um 15:02 schrieb Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:37:13 +0200
> Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus  wrote:
> 
>> I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested
>> comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first
>> comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like
>> FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting
>> accordingly. Is there any option I am missing so I get correct syntax
>> highlighting for TP-like nested comment handling?
> 
> Here this is highlighted and parsed correctly:
> 
> {$mode tp}> { { }
> begin
> end.
> 
> How do you tell Lazarus that the unit is tp mode?

Well, only in the Project options because I didn't want to modify the source, 
this is why I asked
how to switch the behavior (I found out I can do this by changing the 
highlighter to delphi).

BTW: {$mode iso/extpas} do not change the behavior either, only $mode tp does.
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] A fix for an annoying problem on Linux

[Ralf Quint via Lazarus]

On 4/3/2018 6:51 AM, Rik van Kekem via Lazarus wrote:

Op 03-04-2018 15:40 schreef wkitty42--- via Lazarus:

On 04/02/2018 09:51 AM, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:

Here you go ...



what did you change? i see the code you added but i do not see any 
difference in the pictures you posted...


It's a very (very) subtle difference...

It will add the focus-line at the top and bottom within the edit.
(in this case in red but depends on color-scheme) 
Well, would have really helped if the OP mentioned that with one simple 
sentence. I did not see that either until looking again after Michael 
mentioned it... :(


Ralf

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] A fix for an annoying problem on Linux

[Rik van Kekem via Lazarus]

Op 03-04-2018 15:40 schreef wkitty42--- via Lazarus:

On 04/02/2018 09:51 AM, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:

Here you go ...



what did you change? i see the code you added but i do not see any 
difference in the pictures you posted...


It's a very (very) subtle difference...

It will add the focus-line at the top and bottom within the edit.
(in this case in red but depends on color-scheme)

Rik
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] A fix for an annoying problem on Linux

[Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus]

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, wkitty42--- via Lazarus wrote:


On 04/02/2018 09:51 AM, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:

Here you go ...



what did you change? i see the code you added but i do not see any difference 
in 
the pictures you posted...


The value for the dropdown in the property editor has now a surrounding 
rectangle.

I also had to look really carefully to see it.

Michael.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] A fix for an annoying problem on Linux

[wkitty42--- via Lazarus]

On 04/02/2018 09:51 AM, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:

Here you go ...



what did you change? i see the code you added but i do not see any difference in 
the pictures you posted...



--
 NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
   *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless*
   *a signed and pre-paid contract is in effect with us.*
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

[Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus]

On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:37:13 +0200
Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus  wrote:

> I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested
> comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first
> comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like
> FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting
> accordingly. Is there any option I am missing so I get correct syntax
> highlighting for TP-like nested comment handling?

Here this is highlighted and parsed correctly:

{$mode tp}
{ { } 
begin
end.

How do you tell Lazarus that the unit is tp mode?

Mattias
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to bugreport #33331 completely changes long standing behaviour

[Torsten Bonde Christiansen via Lazarus]

On 2018-04-03 14:41, Maxim Ganetsky via Lazarus wrote:


03.04.2018 11:52, Torsten Bonde Christiansen via Lazarus пишет:

Dear List.

The bug report: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=1

has completely changed the behavious of how TTreeview behave!

The old behaviour (sending OLD current node in OnChanging, sending
NEW/SELECTED node in OnChange) is consistent across other components as
well.

The bug report is closed so i cannot make an objection to this "fix".

It has created a heck loads of bug in our programs due to this change -
can this please be reverted?!?

I reopened this bug report. Please comment there.


Thank you Maxim!

-Torsten.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to bugreport #33331 completely changes long standing behaviour

[Maxim Ganetsky via Lazarus]

03.04.2018 11:52, Torsten Bonde Christiansen via Lazarus пишет:
> Dear List.
> 
> The bug report: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=1
> 
> has completely changed the behavious of how TTreeview behave!
> 
> The old behaviour (sending OLD current node in OnChanging, sending
> NEW/SELECTED node in OnChange) is consistent across other components as
> well.
> 
> The bug report is closed so i cannot make an objection to this "fix".
> 
> It has created a heck loads of bug in our programs due to this change -
> can this please be reverted?!?

I reopened this bug report. Please comment there.

-- 
Best regards,
 Maxim Ganetsky  mailto:gan...@narod.ru
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] Changes to bugreport #33331 completely changes long standing behaviour

[Torsten Bonde Christiansen via Lazarus]

Dear List.

The bug report: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=1

has completely changed the behavious of how TTreeview behave!

The old behaviour (sending OLD current node in OnChanging, sending 
NEW/SELECTED node in OnChange) is consistent across other components as 
well.


The bug report is closed so i cannot make an objection to this "fix".

It has created a heck loads of bug in our programs due to this change - 
can this please be reverted?!?


Kind regards,
Torsten Bonde Christiansen
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

[Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus]

I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested
comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first
comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like
FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting
accordingly. Is there any option I am missing so I get correct syntax
highlighting for TP-like nested comment handling?
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

[Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus]

I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested
comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first
comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like
FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting
accordingly. Is there any option I am missing so I get correct syntax
highlighting for TP-like nested comment handling?
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] First click disappearing

[Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus]

Hi,

I'm completely puzzled by the following bug:

My setup: trunk lazarus, FPC 3.1.1, GTK2 widgetset.

in the FPReport report designer the first click almost anywhere is simply not
registered in any OnMouseDown handler.

I have tried to reproduce this in a more simple program, but failed till now.

Stephano (patspi...@gmail.com) can reliably reproduce this as well, 
and reported that he has observed the same problem for some time in 
the source editor of the lazarus IDE as well, but it disappeared after some

weeks (presumably something was fixed)

The strange thing is that it can be reproduced in the dialogs of the
program, as well, not just in the main window.

To reproduce: 
* compile the reportdesign program (components/fpreport/design) using FPC 3.1.1.

* Start program
* Load design attached to bug 33453 (any other will do as well)
* click on a field -> nothing happens. (onmousedown is not called, I debugged 
this)
* click again on the field -> field is selected

See also
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=33453

and the 2 related bugs.

Michael.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

[Florian Klämpfl via Lazarus]

I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested
comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first
comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like
FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting
accordingly. Is there any option I am missing so I get correct syntax
highlighting for TP-like nested comment handling?
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus